• 14 replies
    marye
    Joined:
    As probably the only person to have managed both the Stones and the Dead, Sam Cutler, as you may imagine, tells some great tales in his book. But also, in a chapter called Yin and Yang, he talks about the profound differences between the two bands, and I was especially struck by this bit: ...Mick Jagger and Keith Richards were supremely gifted media manipulators. These two ostensibly unlikely promo-tarts were experts at self-promotion and publicity, masters at dealing with and manipulating the straight world. In some respects, the straight world had made them. The Dead adamantly refused to believe that they actually needed the straight world and the media to make their whole trip a success. The resolutely aimed themselves at a minority and were unfazed by mass-market tastes or opinions. The Haight-Ashbury district from which the Dead had evolved had been an attempt to create an alternative to straight society. The Rolling Stones were interested in exploiting straight society, not in coming u

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • marye
    Joined:
    yeah, pomo
    he was describing a particular period, for sure, and things took different turns.
  • Anonymous (not verified)
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    the Stones and others
    These groups from the 60's and 70's were all fabulous in their time: Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd,Jimi Hendricks, Janis Joplin, ,all the Woodstock bands , how lucky we were to be teen agers then and be part of all this new music Rock and Roll ! We also were ecologists and anti-wars militants then ! And aware of how TV manipulated people into ready-made thinking too ! The Grateful Dead was the perfect example of this revolutionary alternative then , until Jerry died .
  • Anonymous (not verified)
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Agree w/Cutler and Pomo
    Jagger had a business Masters from Cambridge or some other snobby, elite, school. He knew where he was taking the Stones. And, Hey, w/complete blood transfers, addiction doesn't have to be a problem -- just a procedure at the end of every tour - albeit an expensive one. But the Dead's different approach to the record business did take some unexpected twists and turns. Most importantly, their visionary policy of letting fans record gave them Phat revenues with every mixed-down release of a past concert remotely acceptable, especially a complete concert.
  • pomo1
    Joined:
    Interesting, mary
    However, while I think Sam's description was accurate at the time he was involved, my feeling is that the Dead's vibe morphed into something very different. Whether that was their fault, or just that times changed, or they just became too big, I don't know. "That path is for, your steps alone."
user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months
Forums
As probably the only person to have managed both the Stones and the Dead, Sam Cutler, as you may imagine, tells some great tales in his book. But also, in a chapter called Yin and Yang, he talks about the profound differences between the two bands, and I was especially struck by this bit: ...Mick Jagger and Keith Richards were supremely gifted media manipulators. These two ostensibly unlikely promo-tarts were experts at self-promotion and publicity, masters at dealing with and manipulating the straight world. In some respects, the straight world had made them. The Dead adamantly refused to believe that they actually needed the straight world and the media to make their whole trip a success. The resolutely aimed themselves at a minority and were unfazed by mass-market tastes or opinions. The Haight-Ashbury district from which the Dead had evolved had been an attempt to create an alternative to straight society. The Rolling Stones were interested in exploiting straight society, not in coming u
user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months
Permalink

However, while I think Sam's description was accurate at the time he was involved, my feeling is that the Dead's vibe morphed into something very different. Whether that was their fault, or just that times changed, or they just became too big, I don't know. "That path is for, your steps alone."
user picture
Default Avatar
Permalink

Jagger had a business Masters from Cambridge or some other snobby, elite, school. He knew where he was taking the Stones. And, Hey, w/complete blood transfers, addiction doesn't have to be a problem -- just a procedure at the end of every tour - albeit an expensive one. But the Dead's different approach to the record business did take some unexpected twists and turns. Most importantly, their visionary policy of letting fans record gave them Phat revenues with every mixed-down release of a past concert remotely acceptable, especially a complete concert.
user picture
Default Avatar
Permalink

These groups from the 60's and 70's were all fabulous in their time: Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd,Jimi Hendricks, Janis Joplin, ,all the Woodstock bands , how lucky we were to be teen agers then and be part of all this new music Rock and Roll ! We also were ecologists and anti-wars militants then ! And aware of how TV manipulated people into ready-made thinking too ! The Grateful Dead was the perfect example of this revolutionary alternative then , until Jerry died .
user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months
Permalink

he was describing a particular period, for sure, and things took different turns.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

a major turning point for Dead fans being more "alternative" was when "Touch of Grey" etc hit MTV. At shows after that, it seemed that there was a new element of fan, who thought it was hip to play hippie for a night, as opposed to more of a fan-lifestyle like earlier. I think the Stones were also actively promoting an image of it being cool to be "bad and wild", so yes I guess I agree with Sam's evaluation about the Stones being more about marketing all along, and the Dead being more about counter-culture and just making music. UNTIL aforementioned MTV, where the lines, at least superficially, got blurrier. ach blah blah blah, am not sure anymore whether am making any sense with this thought, but will post it nevertheless. ********************************** By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another man's I mean. Mark Twain
user picture
Default Avatar
Permalink

Who had control of the Grateful Dead from say, Brent's death going forward? It is hard to believe that they chose their eventual demise instead of just not touring so much. Of course, I'm glad the Dead didn't turn into a bunch of vampires -- like what I saw with the Stones during the Superbowl half-time show a couple of years ago. It was so bad and such a joke.
user picture

Member for

16 years 2 months
Permalink

which would you prefer? I think that compairing the stones to the dead is like comparing apples to elephants. Yes, I will concur that the stones in the early years were quite a rock and roll band, but in the later years, lets face it, they suck. No matter what your thoughts are about 90's dead, they certainly never sucked. I totally agree with Sam, the dead were never about making it big, getting that first million, it was about the music, were they not the last San Francisco band to get signed? I also agree with Tigerlilly, things sure did change when a dead show became a place for people to go and be a hippy for a day, altho I did witness some majical events at some of those post MTV shows. I remember the days when there were only 3500 people at the shows and it was like our own little secret, absolutely wonderful and those IMHO are the days that the Dead imbraced and really did create a counterculture all of there own, where all of us "freaks" could come and be renewed, reborn, reenergized, it was a beautiful thing, and one that, unfortunately, had to end due to the media exposure.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

... that GD merchandising and customer/fan relations have ended up where they are.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years 6 months
Permalink

...and no matter how often you ask, you can't get these new Deadmysters to offer a traditional Skull and Roses t-shirt. The whole thing appears to have gone cartoony to me.
user picture

Member for

16 years
Permalink

yeah it`s kind of sad that it was kind of not meant to be- Grateful Dead was a massive statemeant of the hippie movement, but sadly as the deep ecology movement it is just something for some few people to understand and enjoy. All we can do is to go on and not be so involved and reflective of what has been and so it was and so on , it`s in my opinion just to linger on. Somehow it is just a matter of time and willingness to gather up and enjoy together. I never went due to being away from it all, the USA, Europe is for sure just a consumption massive hanging on to the way it has been, men power and making the most economically, it has to be in my and many others a massive revolution towards women`s values like staying together, caring being friendly, putting those spiritual principles in action and live together as we are supposed to be, a big happy family :) we move on and let`s hope some day we stick together, more friendly and caring, LOVE IS ALL YOU NEED
user picture

Member for

4 years 1 month
Permalink

death is the end of one's life in this life but a beginning in the next<a href="facebook.com">.</a>

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

3 years 6 months
Permalink

Don't we all wish for an alternative reality,
wouldn't that be nice. Existing outside of our own perception of what is real. On the 28th of July I was able to call such domain my plain of existence. For the 4th year in a row since the dead and company began touring in North Carolina my dead head father and I got to experience the closest thing to the real dead post further. My father aged 67 years sporting the Bob Weir classic doo and I found our spot on the lawn to enjoy a night of love and connection. That before we knew it would be dissolved into a dissociative era known as a coronavirus fearful wasteland. In which my father lost his life in march of 2020 and I lost myself to the uncertainty of finding guiding light in my pursuit of peace. He had been planning to purchase tickets for us to attend the upcoming 2020 tour. Which was lost in our current reality similar to my occupation. Almost a year since then tour dates have been reinstated and I am finally able to look forward to continuing the tradition that my father held closest to his heart. Luckily enough the cost of the highest level of VIP is affordable to me. That being said I have not found a option in this reality that allows me to come in contact with my fathers most admired musicians. To be able to take a picture with them and share my story would allow me to complete an aspiration of my fathers that he was unable to maintain throughout his fruitful life. I write this tale of love, compassion, and aspiration only to find a glimmer of hope. In which my father living through me could come to meet his musical heroes who inspired him to live a life of love. I am son of Michael Fisher Hostetter looking for a glimmer of hope in this reality in which I believe love exists to meet my fathers idols and share my story.