Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • Strang3stofplaces
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    PT Barnum

    I actually never said that you can't post political things, what I originally said was "it'd be great if these forums could try to focus on the music, reddit does exist after all". To back that up, I gave an analogy which, because you missed it, is a comparison of sorts like how you wouldn't talk about Adam and Eve in biology class, not that you couldn't. If you were able to read rationally, you'd see that I, several times, said you can post whatever you'd like, but that's not the literal topic of this forum. Not really room for debate on that, just kind of obvious. Hey, maybe you didn't know there are forums out there on the web where you can discuss whatever the topic may be, it's really cool actually. Again, for a place that's designated as a discussion on Dave's Picks, we're not doing a whole lot of that, but hey is what it is, right? As for me being an election denier, thanks for the assumption, and I'd guess you're old enough to know what they say about assumptions, right? Also, you equating my suggestion to talk about the music more to a politician denying women the right to advocate for women's rights is just as ignorant as the politician. I'd suggest you just read a little slower or maybe throw some fine tunes on, smoke a big fat j and relax before you feel the need to take so hard of a stance.

  • That Mike
    Joined:
    Chef Jack

    Jack - That halibut meal (sans artichokes) sounds amazing. A bunch of us had halibut on the weekend, but it was “Fries with that?” kind!
    Hey, didn’t I tell you and Oro those Sabres would be a team on the rise? Give them a couple of years.

    Headline in my news feed today: “Iron Maiden's Bruce Dickinson stubs out fans smoking bud at heavy metal concert”. I gather the bass player for IM has an aversion to cannabis. The times they are a changin’

  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    Peeling the Onion

    I just glanced at a couple articles so don’t really know much, so I’m not sure Jeff? It sounds like it just got invented so I’m guessing the Woodstock thing is something else?
    You can check out stuff on Peter Jackson’s Let It Be which is where and what for the tech was developed. Giles Martin has used it via PJ for Live at Hollywood Bowl and Revolver redos.
    Somewhere the description is used: I was given a cake and when finished I had eggs, flour, sugar, etc…
    Very interesting prospect. I just wonder how that effects the original sonics but I’m guessing GM wouldn’t let it get released on Beatles redos if it wasn’t proper?
    But yes Jim it does propose a Frankenstein esque scenario, and I’m not sure of anything anymore, but I’d bet the farm that some Deadheads would most certainly have some kind of problem with it, especially if it was good lol
    Theoretically this couid be a game changer for all old music…

  • bigbrownie
    Joined:
    2023 Subscription

    So, I just went to the store and ordered it. Thanks for the heads up, folks!

  • proudfoot
    Joined:
    The Bickerman

    Scary-ass film

    Wait, no...Wickerman. the OG.

    my car is on loan this week to a family member, so very limited opportunity to listen to GD.

    11 1 79 is in progress; back to it ASAP.

  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Separating Two Tracks

    Interesting sidebar. There is a part of me that is really curious about how this would work and sound. There is another part of me that wonders how this would be received if Norman et. al. adopted the technology and set it in motion. I remember the feedback he got when he messed with Phil's bass a dozen or so releases ago.

    My guess is even if the techology were rolled out so others could use it wouldn't necessarily go over well. Separating out the individual components from the two tracks and monkeying with the levels might drive some bonkers. I bet it would be controversial at best. Well.. at least had Bear, Betty & Co. to save us some of the agony.

    Be well folks.. play dead, get the vote out. ..or as DHBrewer says, be kind.. rewind (to 1969).

  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    Bobby gets pretty political....

    ....just saying.
    Some more '77? I'm good with that 👍.

  • JeffSmith
    Joined:
    Lift and Separate

    Hey ORO, Didn't they use the same technology or a similar instrument-separating technology on the 50th anniversary mega box for Woodstock? IE: Got BS&T's individual horns, etc. back in tune, etc. Would be very cool if that became available for future and/or revisited Grateful Dead releases.

    Probably old news to many, but I only recently ran across this. It's sort of a poor-head's way to listen to individual players on the China-Rider; Bertha; Playing in the Band; Sugar Magnolia from Veneta 8/27/72:
    dead dot net/playingintheband

    Sorry, but my optimism for the future is very low these days. I always thought that TRUTH was not a fashion or something to be molded to fit one's personal world-view and needs. We are losing/have lost the ability to listen and learn from others. Daverock's quote bears repeating: "Think it possible that you may be mistaken."

  • PT Barnum
    Joined:
    strangest

    I'm having a problem following your posts. First, the Grateful Dead was/is a political band, you said so in your post. Mentioning the rainforest benefit shows in 88 and specifically calling out 5-6-70 right after Kent State, I'm presuming that you must mean Phil's comment after the show? We all said that multiple times back in the day. Then you say there is no room on this forum for politics? Sucks for you and all the people who want to talk about the band and the music? A bit inflexible I would say, but hey, that sucks for me. Your condescending tone about the internet being a big place and there are other places for me or anyone else to post about other topics than the music or the band is just like a politician telling a woman she doesn't have control over her own body. Somehow I get the feeling that I'm speaking to an election denier, and I know that is a waste of time so I will end with this You don't get to tell me where or what I can say, dig it? On this site, only MaryE gets to do that.

  • Strang3stofplaces
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Grilled Halibut

    Damn, that sounds wonderful! I was all "died down", then I see someone calling, I think, me a selfish asshole. At least I didn't see it to be directed elsewhere. So look someone's gonna throw mud around and not even have the decency to direct it at me, I'm not gonna be quiet. But I'm all done arguing over this nonsense. Seriously, talk about whatever you want, I'll just inject my thoughts on whatever the release might be.

    Dave's 2023 announced with 45 looking to represent two spectacular shows from 10/1 and 10/2/77. Hot take but I love the fall tour even more than the spring, though I won't sit here and say the spring is not audio gold. There's a great Miller remaster of the Betty boards on the archive, check those shows out if you're unfamiliar, they are hot hot hot. Scarlet > Fire on the second night is especially so and new minglewood on the first is my personal favorite. Always hoping for 6/10/73 and 6/21/80 (also 71) so we'll see if any of those are one of the later picks.

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

3 years 7 months
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I've been laid up for a month so have just been watching the seaside chat for DP44 and the 26 minute listening party. Can't say I recall if I've heard this show before but I'm really looking forward to it now. I see it has still not sold out yet.
I must say I think Dave has done a fine job with his four picks for 2022 with something for everyone and they have all sounded superb. Roll on next year's subscription and hopefully a couple more box sets.

user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months
Permalink

Sorry you missed out on Dylan DaveRock. Might sound ghoulish but I waded straight in and bought tickets thinking it’s unlikely I’ll see him again. Here in Nottingham on Friday. Just hoping I’ll recover quickly from Covid first…

user picture

Member for

10 years 1 month

In reply to by frankparry

Permalink

I look forward to seeing your comments on the Dylan show in Nottingham.
PS - Get better!

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months

In reply to by frankparry

Permalink

FrankParry - yes, it will be good to hear what it was like. Hope you make a quick recovery - with none of this long covid. to contend with.

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

I've also been saying 3-9-81 sounds a tad bit fast.
Cassettes are prone to that. Does Plangent only fix the wobbles?
Not ghoulish Frank, after all we are on the Grateful Dead site.
And Halloween is around the corner.
I felt exactly the same way when seeing GD in PHX in 1994.
During the second set of 3-6-94 I distinctly remember feeling that either Jerry or I wouldn't be around all that much longer. Or at least that shows weren't what they used to be for me. Somehow I'm still here. Although I can't say I've treated myself much better than Jerry did. Just lucky I guess. And grateful.
Cheers

....I recognize that guy! Nice shades.
Get better Frank Parry. My step-daughter got covid and she almost died. To all the losers out there, saying "Its just the flu", I'm going to assume no loved ones of yours were effected by it. Must be nice to be so ignorant. Selfish assholes, the lot of you.
Oh. And just so you dumbasses know, a vaccine is not a cure. Sheesh.
Conservatives regarding the covid vaccine. "My body, my choice."
Also Conservatives regarding abortions. "Your body yes, but not your choice because Jesus. Raped? Incest? Oh well. You should have been more careful. Let's throw out some bounties while we're at it." Evangelicals are the worst.
Get out there and vote like your life depends on it. Because it does. And dont be intimidated. They will say the elections were stolen anyway if they lose. Check out the drop box "watchers" in Arizona. It's already happening.
My political rant for the month. Hope you all have a grate Sunday.

user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

Your rant is refreshing and worth repeating. In nine days we can get back to tape speeds and that stuff.

....10.22.22. Althea.
That was very, very nice. TAB horns and background vox.
It's on the toob. I suggest you go there. Just sayin'

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months

In reply to by Vguy72

Permalink

And this from the Guy who pointed out that others were going off topic ! I guess it depends who you are as to whether what you say is considered acceptable or not.
I'd rather see a post about tape speeds than be subject to someone blowing off about abortion or covid/vaccines.

user picture

Member for

15 years
Permalink

Hey man, I can understand you not wanting to hear about what you just said being that you live across the pond and it really doesn't affect you. On the other hand, this is Amerika and we say what we feel here, sometimes it isn't what others want to hear, but I can understand Vguy's rage. I don't live where you do so I don't know if there are others who feel the way Vguy does where you live but here, it's a pretty big deal. Midterm elections are coming and freedom is on the ballot, I agree with Vguy's rant, we need more like him, stand up and shout it out for all to hear Vguy. These anti everything that are out there saying elections are rigged and votes don't count have got to be stopped for they are the voices of our downfall.
Wonder what Dave's next pick will be? I haven't a clue.
no captcha, far out

user picture

Member for

15 years
Permalink

proudfoot I don't recall anyone writing that on this site before.

But sense you did lets just say vote. Take a friend to vote, take your lover to vote, take your neighbor to vote, take your mother or father or brother or sister or auntie or who ever to vote. Voting is easy, it's good for the country and it's fun.
Just trying to lighten it up a bit folks. Peace

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

5 years 7 months
Permalink

From the listening party Stranger, it sounds like Jerry is kind of buried in the mix, and absolutely not the first time I've heard that on a remastered release. Take the slipknot from 10/12/83 off the recent box, for example. Not sure if I'm the only one who feels like this, but isn't a lead guitar supposed to "lead"? Obviously I understand the whole ethos of the Dead's music, that they were going for a more united sound, but it seems kind of detractive for Bob's "rhythm" notes to be overshadowing Jerry's lines. I understand that Norman mixes the remaster democratically, but again, what's a lead guitar for if not for the spotlight? I read once that Norman doesn't raise Jerry's levels on any remaster because "he was already loud enough", but if you're normalizing the levels across the board, he just gets lost in the fray. Another thing I wanna point out is that Jerry wasn't the leader of the grateful dead, he always made a point of shying away from that, but let's be honest, who was the one people deified when he was alive and more so after he passed? Shouldn't that be somewhat reflected in the remastering? I just feel that Jerry's leads should be overpowering and yet, I've got the volume turned up as much as I can without sacrificing fidelity just to hear what he was playing, and even then, I've gotta really focus on him for that. Anyway, rant over, just thought I'd share my two cents. Not even sure if this is the right place to do so, despite it being the forum for Dave's 44, as the subject matter tends to talk about nearly anything but the release itself. The grateful dead were always a political band, to be sure, but it'd be great if these forums could try to focus on the music, reddit does exist after all.

Thanks and I'm really not trying to be a d**k with the ending there

user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months

In reply to by Strang3stofplaces

Permalink

…call for desperate measures.
Make sure you vote or we soon might not be allowed to, and what we do here might not be allowed either…

user picture

Member for

15 years
Permalink

I concur with your statement ie Jerry. I wonder if Jer was alive, if these remasters would sound different? I think the remaining members might be an influence. For sure, I don't have any knowledge of that being said anywhere, just wondering?

user picture

Member for

15 years

In reply to by Oroborous

Permalink

just got censored by MSN and Microsoft for agreeing with, shall we say, patriots, who stated the truth about what is going down. It's already happening and let's hope they stay away from this site.

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

When the Dick's Picks were coming out, likely still the ones Dick picked, I remember hearing that Mickey was helping the crew with the remastering-mixing. It made sense because I've always thought they were a bit drum heavy. It is still that way but not to the degree that's as noticeable. Plus I've changed equipment now so maybe that's all it was to begin with.
Did my civic duty yesterday. Colorado has been vote by mail for years now thank goodness. But I don't get the cool sticker that says I voted.
Cheers, let's go out and make it a good one.

Please keep them off the board. Despite what was said earlier, the GD was not a political band. Very much to the contrary. Encouraging people to vote is not being political.

Let's keep our comments to the poor sound/mix quality of the MSG box.

Thank you.

user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months

In reply to by Oroborous

Permalink

and others.
For the eighteenth time: these are not professionally recorded multi track recordings!!
They were NEVER intended to be released!
They are 2 channel (stereo) tapes that were produced by Dan Healy as a tool to help him with his work.
That work was to make the band sound good live in concert, not your living room!
Consequently, sometimes the mix might not make sense in your living room. I,e., if the stage instruments are really loud, the mixer won’t need to boost as much through the PA. Thus, those instruments might not seem loud enough on the tape, or in your living room. Furthermore, the first song is always unbalanced, sometimes it takes a good chunk of the first set, as the mix is dependent on how loud or quiet the signal sent by the musician is: if Jerry hasn’t turned up yet, then he won’t seem loud enough. During the first song the mixer is mostly trying to get the vocals going, and bringing the overall levels up, so he’s not going to worry about messing with JGs level too much knowing that JG will turn himself up when he wants to. When you mix the same band all the time, you don’t turn all the knobs back to zero after each show, you leave things generally where they are (or will you know they’ll need to be) and then fine tune the next night as needed. Basically, he sets levels approximately where they’ll end up and let’s the band grow into them if you will.
With Beatty boards etc, there was a dedicated person, who was able to create a mix specifically for making a recording, unfortunately later on the tapes were not made like this so sometimes they have more noticeable anomalies.
Since this is baked into the 2 track only tape, THERE IS NO WAY TO FIX IT!
It is what it is, caveat emptor as these releases used to clearly warn!

Now it it was a multitrack tape (meaning most instruments have their own channel on the tape which can be individually modified later on, and something was disproportionately low in the release mix, THEN you’d have a point, but since it’s only a 2 channel tape made as an afterthought, not intended for release, you have to take it or leave it.

OFF TOPIC: really DR, your going to criticize about that? The guy who usually talks about anything BUT GD?
I mean no offense but if some of us have to hear about Hawkwind again we’re gonna puke!

user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months

In reply to by Oroborous

Permalink

There is nothing anyone can do about changing the levels of individual instruments on these recordings.
What Mickey or whomever was doing was helping with remastering, which is something completely different.

And really, I’ve heard and read Bobbie clearly stating that “we’ve all been asleep too long” and even more straight up political call to get involved before it’s too late. Yes nobody likes this, but that’s how fucked up it’s getting.
I mean how desperate do things have to get before it’s ok to mention uncomfortable stuff?
So just keep burying your head in the sand and soon we won’t be allowed to talk like this at all!
The futures here, we are it, we are on our own!

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

With all these talks of sound mixes. 2 tracks and so on. Wonder if it's financially feasible for GD to employ the "AI" technology that was used on The Beatles "Get Back" movie and the upcoming "Revolver" remix. As I understand it, a technology was used to separate out different parts of the sound so they can be mix separately, which no one could do before because of the "tracks" limitation. For example, if brent, bobby, and phil were all recorded on one track - the original mix (how loud each instrument was in the mix) is it, it's all we got. If the keyboard is drowning out everything else, there's no way to fix it no matter how many times anyone remaster it, because that's the master! But I believe this new technology can separate each instrument out to its own track, and then they can be remix and give us a more balanced sound.

I guess it's depend on how much more we're willing to pay to employ this tech!

user picture

Member for

4 years 4 months

In reply to by narutlee

Permalink

One thing about audience recordings...not a lot of mix issues.

Like 10 6 80.

High energy with no political commentary filler.

user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months

In reply to by proudfoot

Permalink

Fascinating!
Never heard of this, do you know offhand where we could learn more?
Sounds like prime geek feast!
That certainly could be a game changer.

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 1 month

In reply to by Oroborous

Permalink

It would be great isn't it?? I don't know if this means everything can be a "multi-track" recording now?

There are several interviews about this floating out there. Try searching for "Peter Jackson Beatles Get Back Interview" and "Giles Martin Beatles Revolver interview". They should talk about this technology in those interviews. Enjoy!

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

5 years 7 months
Permalink

Just to clarify my thoughts on this, they definitely were political, certainly not to the tune of endorsing a political party or another, but think about 5/6/70, free concert held at MIT after Kent State or the whole save the rainforest campaign in the late 80s. Being political does not solely confine itself to the nature of voting. Regardless, this forum is literally for discussing the music and not to serve the purpose of being a digital stump speech. So please, start another website or forum somewhere else if that's what you want to get your rocks off on. I very rarely have posted here but often check em out to see what might be being discussed, i.e. the music, and it is increasingly rare that that is the topic at the moment. To transition to that, how about this? What are some the hopes for the next Dave's? Due to be announced with the almanac in the next week or so. Personally, I'm hoping 46 will be 6/10/73 (arguably the best setlist ever) with a bonus disc of 6/9/73.

And orobouros, thanks for the clarification on the mix levels being due to the 2 track source, and I definitely get the whole first song not usually being reflective of the levels of the whole show.

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

Check PMs. Thx
Cheers

For DaP 45: More '78 please, and thank you.

Nuratlee, I will search…

Stangestofplaces. Glad you understand,just trying to be informative.
I can certainly understand if you don’t like it, just seems like often there are folks who don’t understand the limitations involved and thus feel the team derelict in some way. I think they usually do a great job with what they have to work with. I mean even with all the inherent idiosyncrasies, all things considered I think they sound pretty dern good!
I just wish they’d release more multis!
Smithers release the…

EDIT: HF, dig the new shades!
The kids are fine and hopefully will be on their way back home on Wednesday…

user picture

Member for

15 years
Permalink

for someone who doesn't comment much on these boards, you sure got a lot to say about what we can talk about here. NO censorship means just that, NO, so if you want to talk fishin' I guess that will be ok. I think Jerry stated that the political stuff is what was f**ked up about the 60's so now they might be a bit more political, I mean you never saw Jerry holding a blue or God forbid a red vote sign. The remaining members sans Phil have been a lot more vocal about voting and being political. All good, there are a lot of Deadheads and getting the word out about voting is ok in my book.
As far as the next pick, some late 72 would be just fine Dave, thanks. Or some more 1980 Gainesville would be nice too.

What aaaaabout Gainesville?

It’s been 36 picks since the last 1980 show. 24 since 81, and 20 since he decided a 72 DaP.

Here’s a Breakdown of Dave’s Picks
(First #) = Year:
(2nd =)Total Releases from this year/
(3rd = )How Many Releases since last pick from this year../
(4th =)Release # of last pick from this year

80: 1 / 36 / #8
———————
81: 1 / 24 / #20
———————
72: 3 / 20 / #24
———————-
71: 3 / 18 / #26
76: 3 / 16 / #28
————————
70: 2 / 14 / #30
79: 1 / 13 / #31
———————-
84: 1 / 9 / #35 (1+)
87: 1(2) / 8 / #36 (2)
————————-
78: 4 / 7 / #37
73: 5 / 6 / #38 (1+)
83: 2 / 5 / #39
————————
77: 6 / 3 / #41
74: 6 / 2 / #42 (1+)
69: 3 / 1 /#43 (2)
90: 2(3) / - / #44
————————

No Picks from:
66-68, 75
82, 85, 86,
88, 89, 91-95

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

5 years 8 months
Permalink

Just cause I don't post often here doesn't give me any less of a right to complain. The internet is a seemingly endless place, and there are probably better places to get out the vote than on a forum for Dave's Picks 44. I didn't say you can't talk about it, and if you want to talk about anything go ahead with it. But jeez, I just come here to discuss Dave's 44, or the series as a whole, or whatever the topic is and that is just so damn rarely what's being discussed. If you want to promote the political right of voting, go out and do that, however you'd like. If this is the preferred place for it, sucks for me and all the people who'd like to confine it to the band and the music, don't it? Freedom of speech is freedom of speech, but you don't go into a church talking about quantum physics or NASA talking about how God is the reason the space shuttle landed on the moon. All I'm saying there.

That being said, late 72 would be great, as late as possible with that NYE show being particularly hot.

And don't mistake my words as being aggressive, although they may be charged.

user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months

In reply to by Strang3stofplaces

Permalink

....that there would be backlash. But everything I said was true. Is this primarily a music related forum? Yes. Do we also talk about a myriad of other topics. A resounding yes.
If some of you were "offended" in some way, believe me. That was not my intent. Im just being honest. The last five years has put a definite strain on what is considered American democracy and the rift is growing wider in my opinion. Prior to then, I rarely payed attention to politics at all. But things have changed. I have lost friends and family over this shit. My workplace got toxic after 1/6. Some thought is was "funny" and approved of it. And all because some narcissistic egomaniac is a sore loser. It baffles my mind. Not everything is sunflowers and patchouli oil. Just my two cents. Take it for what you will. And my timing for going there is on point.
And yes, Gainesville would be welcome.

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months

In reply to by PT Barnum

Permalink

PT - thanks for you post. I know quite a few people with very strong opinions, though - I listened to someone ranting and raving about Boris Johnson only yesterday. Would that be a suitable thing to post about? God help us if it is ! The last demonstration I went on was only last month, too - but again - I don't see this as a platform for going on about it.

Oro...well. Surely there is a difference between someone discussing non Dead related music on here as opposed to venting their political angst. I have discovered all sorts of bands and musicians on here that I would never otherwise have come across. John Coltrane's "Ascension" was the last one. But if you feel like puking, then that's okay with me. Hawkwind apparently used to provoke it in the unwary,with their use of lasers and lights around the time of "Silver Machine". So you would be in good company - hey...over there, though.

Ist show - good man - cheers. Definitely more 1978! I gave the bonus disc of the From Egypt With Love shows a spin last night - great stuff.

user picture

Member for

3 years 1 month
Permalink

Mtns of the Moon was such a great tune, the Dead only did it 11 times in 1969 and never after that, makes you wonder why they dropped it. I always thought it would have been cool if they would have brought it back for the 1980 Warfield acoustic shows.

user picture

Member for

4 years 2 months
Permalink

My guess about "Mountains of the Moon": it's one of the few Dead songs that requires a non-standard guitar tuning, so maybe that was it. IIRC in order to play Mountains "correctly," you gotta tune your guitar down a full step. Play it in standard tuning and it changes the key and makes it harder to sing (for me, anyway). Maybe Garcia just thought it was too much trouble to have a D-tuned guitar handy just in case they felt like doing that song. Just a guess. Whatever the reason, it's a damn shame they didn't play it more.

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 9 months
Permalink

What is Political In the words of abbie hoffman and others everything you do is politcal. Writing a song or taking a crap is political.. Telling someone to stand down sure is too

user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months
Permalink

Any surprises on this one Dave? You know, like the audience patch in Franklin's Tower (10-12-83) on the In And Out Of The Garden Box that you didn't tell us about? Just checking, in case you may have forgotten to tell us. Again.

Like the dude in the movie lol

Sorry, DR, I went too far just making a point and sticking up for vguys right to make his point.
Do we want politics here, not particularly, but the situation is the boss, and the situation these days is too scary and fluid, and the election looms here like Winter coming in GOT, so it is timely. As I say, desperate times…
I agree, the awesome range of topics here is as good as or sometimes better than just the GOGD, but sometimes that mean’s someone’s gonna post something everybody or somebody else doesn’t like, so what, that’s their right, as long as it’s not the only thing they talk about and their intent is not to insult anyone…at least that’s my take on it.
PT and others here put their lives on the line serving our country to protect our awesome freedoms, so the very real threat of losing these freedoms causes Fear & Loathing, which can lead to unpleasantness, and may leave some folks feeling the need to stand up and speak out. What’s so bad about that?

EDIT: Nappy Slacker (just teasing) hope your feeling better (Frank too), been thinking about you as I’ve been reading this Hendrix book that discusses concerts. Every time they mention SoCal shows I wonder if Nappy was there!
Some of you guys: Beatles, early Stones, Hendrix, Pig etc, lucky dogs!

user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months

In reply to by Oroborous

Permalink

Agreed! What an awesome song!
Thank goodness Phil broke it out for us along with all the other old Chestnuts!
Thanks Phil!

user picture

Member for

7 years 7 months
Permalink

Never had this tape. Looks good.

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months

In reply to by Oroborous

Permalink

Oro - no problem, thanks. I guess I am quite lucky in that I know a few people who are more than happy to spend ages talking about what's going on in the world, and what should be done about it. Putting the world to rights, they call it. One of the things they don't know about, or want to know about, is The Dead or their world-so it's nice to tip in here for a daily dose.

product sku
081227881580
Product Magento URL
https://store.dead.net/en/grateful-dead-1/daves-picks-vol.-44-autzen-stadium-eugene-or-62390/081227881580.html