• 1,335 replies
    marye
    Joined:
    Got ideas for how things should be run differently in the Vineyard? Improvements? Suggestions? Brainstorms? Truckloads of fertilizer? Post here.,On the floor at MSG... one perfect song after another...and we were beyond elated with disbelief and gratitude. This was truely a fantasy set list and, in my opinion, the best of my 8 show run.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • cosmicbadger
    Joined:
    no offence taken
    I agree Stuman. Vista sucks. Lets hope Windows 7 will be better now that we have all paid to debug Vista for them. It may be worth avoiding the built in burner and instead use a separate (and free) burning programme such as Burn4Free
  • stuman
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    vista and xp compatability
    First thing , no offence to vist users but umm vista sucks . thats just my opinion of course. From time to time discs burned with vista are not compatible with xp systmes . so here is what my wife has to do everytime she burns a disc for me . " First go to my computer - click on open it will say "burn a disc" disc title she has to leave blank - just leave the date there or it will not burn correctly - there is a "show formating options" with an arrow button , click on it then click -mastered- then drag and drop - then click burn to disc. " Now i dunno if all vista systmes are like this but thats how my wife has to do it . I hope this helps .. Take care and I hope everyone has a super nice day !! Stu ..
  • pomo1
    Joined:
    EGAD EDAD
    "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."Albert Einstein
  • Exploratory Da…
    Joined:
    PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
    As of August 21, the viner known as Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) has changed his name officially to Exploratory Data Analysis Dead (EDAD). We are sorry for any incovenience this may cause.
  • Ursa Minor
    Joined:
    Ok, I'll ring in on the debate...
    Like many here I remember the days of analog and the introduction to digital. I will say after being immersed in digital since the mid 80's and up until about a year ago, I've made the swtich back to analog format. What I mean is I prefer analog for many reasons. Of course, I don't have all these shows on cassette , reels and LP anymore; I have my share of CD's, DATs, DVDs and HD's, but I now employ a complete analog system. I use a Dynaco ST-70 tube amp and a Dynaco PAS-2 tube preamp. I also use my Revox A-77 reel to reel, Thorens TD-125 mk II turntable with the Shure SME 3009 R2 tone arm, and I've got a Yamaha KX-630 tape deck. I've also got a Sony DAT ZA5ES. I'm using a assortment of speakers from Bose 301 series II mid 80's, Altec late 70's bookshelfs, and finally getting some Klipsch La Scalla's from mid 80's. I use a regular commericial Sony CD player but use a "cheap" but effective digital to analog converter that uses a Burr Brown PCM-1716 chip. I use the digital out from the CD player into the DA converter...so there is only one conversion to analog. What I'm saying is this: old debate of digital is compressed anyway in comparison to a nice master reel, well pressed LP. Of course, digital get's better when the sample rate is higher and the resolution increases. However, I still will contend after years of using digital professionally as a studio engineer and as a musician has it's advantages greatly, but I still rather fancy the sound of analog better. As for the archive , it's simply that a resource library of digital material. One thing for sure is that digital is THE way for mass producing and distributing music. However, just last year the greatest increase in sales was in vinyl records that are being pressed by re-issues of older recordings or new releases by artists who relish analog formats. by the way, you can still get the digital SBD stuff via stream if you really want to work at it you get a digital s/pdif output from your computer via the USB - take that feed and go digital into a either another HD or DAT - then you can input that into some editing software splice the gaps, it won't be bit for bit, but it will be marginal digital quality... Ursa Minor http://www.myspace.com/donnieloeffler "the warm wet world of analog audio"
  • cosmicbadger
    Joined:
    Lossless DL from Archive
    For GD shows you can only do this for Audience recordings. Soundboards may only be streamed. Go for example to http://www.archive.org/details/gd1975-06-17.aud.unknown.87560.flac16 Scroll down the page to the heading Individual Files. You will see a whole table of files and formats. The first column is headed FLAC. Click on each file to DL it. Tedious but it works. If you DL the Down'em all plug in for Firefox you can DL all the FLACs in one go and save a lot of bother. Other Artists let you DL FLACs of Soundboards, including David Gans http://www.archive.org/details/DG20030420.flac16
  • stuman
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    I agree with you
    Hey we have to have somthing to talk about , lol .. And I agree with the rest of what you said CB. You said we can download flac from the archives site ? that one is still a mystery to me . maybe I`m doing something wrong there . And yes we should purchase some offical releases when we can , and I do that when my credit card allows me to do so ..
  • cosmicbadger
    Joined:
    Archive ramble
    Perhaps it is better not to think of The Archive as a trading site, but as a permanent online library. It is like a massive stored music collection that belongs to everyone. So downloading a file as an MP3 from the Archive is like making an MP3 from your own losslessly stored music collection. So long as the FLAC/SHN files remain permanently on the Archive in unaltered state, then anyone can always go back there and guarantee to get the best possible version. It is a matter of honesty and trust that people do not upload files to the Archive that have a misrepresented lineage. And there are people out there who will soon detect an MP3 generation in a file by looking at the frequency range. By withdrawing permission for making Soundboards downloadable from the Archive the Dead helped create all this muddle over formats etc. If we all knew that the best quality shows were permanently stored and available 24/7 on our behalf in the best available (ideally lossless) format, then many of these discussions would not be taking place and the trading and torrenting sites we use might not exist in their current forms. But what then would we all have to talk about? Of course the Dead had reasons for doing what they did. There is the issue of intellectual property of their works (important to any artist) and, naturally, money (Blair Jackson has reported here that the Archive virtually killed off sales of the later Dicks Picks releases). So now it is a bit harder and more confusing to get all the shows we want as easily as we want, but it is not really that much hassle. And we should not forget just what an act of tolerance and generosity it is that this site tolerates open trading of shows that are not officially released. One way of saying thanks is to try to buy at least some of the official releases. It would be interesting to know how the sales of the these are holding up, given that fact that, despite the Archive restrictions, most of the shows are still quite easy to obtain.
  • stuman
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    WAV has loss too
    I recentley been listening to a show in flac format via Foobar 2K. I then converted that show to WAV so i could burn it to disc , well it sounds way different to me ..the high`s and lows are cut down and it dos`nt have that punch you in the face feel to it anymore . I`m glad i save everything in flac mode .. Now I have been working in the mechanical services industry all my life ie, cars, trucks, small engines ,motor cycles, so I have a pretty good ear for sound . I can hear a bolt rattling loose on my Harley when i`m going down the road at 80 mph. plus I did own a small electronics repair shop for a little bit ( that was more just a hobby actually ) so I`m familliar with osciloscopes and how sound waves look and sound like .I built speach prossesors for cb radios that compressed the highs to make cb raidios sound like they had more power then they actually did , by increasing the sound modulation.. I`m suprised I can hear like that at my age , lol .. So with the help of CB and Rick I discovered the foobar programand nothing sounds as good as shn/flac , not wav not mp3 not any of the popular formats.. Now getting back to the LL web site , if it is not permited to seed from a mp3 converted to flac then why is there a link to the archives site for a some of those shows ? I mean anyone can create a flac file . I have a tape to pc converting program so i can archive my personal tapes to my pc then burn to disc. now with that progran and that tape deck I can record any streaming audio then send it back through my antique EQ then back into my pc make needed changes , create the text document , use traders little helper to create the md5 checksum and then create the flac files . And the end product is somthing that sounds better then the original audio .. I know there was somthing else i wanted to say but i can`t remember it now .. Anyway , I hope everyone has a most excelent day !!
  • Lopezz
    Joined:
    No, wav files are lossless
    But they are not compressed. And you can copy an mp3 from one folder to another and not lose any information, It's just in editing software. Of course when the mp3 was originaly made it lost the info on the high and low end of the song to make it smaller. But you can copy an mp3 to another computer or disc as an mp3 and it remains the same file. If you want to see some generation loss try this. Convert some mp3's to wav and burn cd with them. Then take that cd and convert the wav files back to mp3 and compare to the original mp3s.
user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months
Forums
Got ideas for how things should be run differently in the Vineyard? Improvements? Suggestions? Brainstorms? Truckloads of fertilizer? Post here.,On the floor at MSG... one perfect song after another...and we were beyond elated with disbelief and gratitude. This was truely a fantasy set list and, in my opinion, the best of my 8 show run.
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

Yeah that is pretty wild! As far as collecting things goes - that's a really cool route to go.. "I've stayed in every blue-light cheap hotel. Can't win for tryin. Dust off those rusty strings just one more time. Gonna make em shine."
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

In honor of the victorious Saints (I was pulling for the old man & the Vikes) I got a DVD flacful of Dr. John shows circa 1972-85, I can offer up. The Truth is realized in an instant, the act is practiced step by step.
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

Catching up to old Favre. You don't retire, then come back playing for your old division rival. It's just so wrong on so many levels. Then again - the Vikes got robbed because that pass interference call in OT was bogus. That should never be called in a championship game let alone in OT of a championship game sheeeesh!! Then again old Favre threw a terrible pick to end regulation ... oh the drama! "I've stayed in every blue-light cheap hotel. Can't win for tryin. Dust off those rusty strings just one more time. Gonna make em shine."
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

15 years 3 months
Permalink

i am from where brett favre grew up and still lives in kiln ms. he does alot for the kids on the gulf coast, i also live just 65 miles from new orleans and have been a saints fan for 43 years. soooooo! geaux saints!! don't think we can beat the other home town kid, peyton manning though.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Go Saints Go!
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

You know a Dr. John vine would be awesome. Would make great road trip tunes for when I go back the end of Feb. - going to visit my daughter and run the Mardi Gras half marathon. " Where does the time go? "
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

A friend of mine attended only one NYE show, 12-31-91, and asked me for a copy. I checked the Vinedex and I didn't see it listed. So if anybody wants to vine it, I would appreciate it, thanks. "That path is for, your steps alone."
user picture

Member for

15 years 8 months
Permalink

I have this show... and will send it to Pomo1.... I can look and see what other New Year's shows have not been vined... and maybe put a New Year's Vine together.... Any one interested in that idea? I have many but certainly not all.... Thanks. Raymond
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I took a quick look at the Vindex, and there are a number of NYE shows already vined, but not of the recent variety. It might be cool to fill in whats missing. Thanks, again. "That path is for, your steps alone."
user picture

Member for

16 years 6 months
Permalink

I have been listening to 2-21-95 salt lake city sbd. Thanks Trevor. This is one great show, and Jerry's voice is crisp and clear. FOTD here is the best 90s vesion I have heard. It is tight, and Jerry's voice is great. I give it a A+ There is no doubt in my mind, Jerry's vocals are better in '94 and '95 going back to say '83 or '82--I'm talking about vocal quality (not flubbed lyrics). I listened to some '88 stuff for comparrison, and his vocals were deep and raspy. Sure, there were some rough '94 and '95 shows but man, some of em' are great.
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

Speaking of flubbed lyrics, listen to the second set of 4/8/85. Jerry clearly does NOT know the lyrics to either Revolution or Touch of Grey. This show proves that a telepromptor is much needed. I don't mind a flubbed lyric here or there, but this is one of those shows that should have embarassed him, and there were definitely some negative thoughts that crept into my head as I listened to it. The rest of my just posted 85 vine is good though! I agree re: his voice that it is better later on (I'd say late 80's rather than 90's though) than it was in the early to mid-80's.
user picture

Member for

15 years 8 months
Permalink

BUT!!! That first set is INCREDIBLE!! I have the same copy of the show as dstache.... and the sound quality is not very good.... but that show still ranks in my personal top ten live shows of all time. The 2 at Merriweather a few months later.... the 89 Fall tour shows... surpass this one.... but being there.... a GREAT show! My 2 cents... Raymond
user picture

Member for

15 years 8 months
Permalink

Forgot my absolute favorite live show .... Richmond Colisuem.... 11/1/85!! Raymond
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

haha, yeah, they like that first set on Archive too. For those that don't know, set 1 included the following interesting combos, among others: In The Midnight Hour > Walking The Dog > Big Boss Man and Down In The Bottom > I Ain't Superstitious. In general, the fact that they bust out an underplayed or new song doesn't do much for me. But maybe here set 2 bothered me so much that I downgraded set 2 retroactively.
user picture

Member for

15 years 8 months
Permalink

Have just sent our friend Pomo the 91 NYEve show he requested.... He has been a pre-85 Dead guy so far.... so I included the Hampton 10/8 & 9/89 shows along with the 10/16/89... I look forward to his response to those Dark Stars! Thanks all.... I am especially grateful to all of you in the Vineyard who have helped me get back in touch with these great shows that I gradually let slip away over the last 10 years or so.... this last year in the Vineyard has been a joy! Raymond
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I will listen to those shows with an open mind. Its not that I never listen to the later stuff, its just that I seem to enjoy the earlier Dead more. Also, I think the fact that I stopped attending shows after 1984 also affects my tastes. I would never think to denigrate anybody for loving the later stuff, as it is all a matter of taste. Besides, even the worst of the Dead is a hell of a lot better than most of the stuff I come across. I will let you guys know what I think of the Hampton shows. "That path is for, your steps alone."
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

I think it helps when listening to shows from the later years if you take things with a grain of salt, recognize that Jerry is NOT the guitarist he once was, and compare shows in that era to one another, rather than to shows from other eras. As to denigrating, I was reading recently on Archive about some '85 show, and the reviewer said how he much preferred the exciting, fast-playing Jerry of '85 to the boring, slow-playing Jerry of '77. I said to myself, "That is the last review of yours I ever need to read as I clearly cannot rely on you for any information." And one more. I won't say the name of the reviewer; I'll let someone else guess who I am talking about. He reviewed shows in the Taping Compendium (not an editor). In one of his reviews of a spring '90 show, he says that that tour was perhaps the best tour since 1974. That is a lot of music to skip over. If he said it was the best tour since Fall 77 I might have said, ok, a little controversial, but reasonable. But to skip over ALL of 1977 and say spring 90 is better than 77, are you nuts?!?!?!? The guy drives me nuts for other reasons (he is so critical of every show, I wonder whether he even likes the band, and he's just pretentious). Anyone know, without looking at the Compendium, the reviewer to whom I am referring?
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

You know what, forget about that last post. Anyone think we need more 89 vined? I have June Shoreline, July Alpine Valley, August Berkeley and September Shoreline shows. One of the Alpine Valley shows has been vined, as have the 3 August Cal Expo shows. If anyone has the early July shows please let me know.
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

To Shoreline Sept 89!!! Been looking for those for a looong time.. "Here's my half a dollar if you dare .. double twist when you hit the air. Look at Julie down below .. the levee doing the dopaso"
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

Ok, I will post the 9/29, 9/30 and 10/1/89 shows next week (plus a bonus of 7/4). I think Marye needs a little break as she has posted a bunch of vines the last 2 days. We'll do this one in both SHN/FLAC and WAV, with me converting and burning to WAV 1 show, and each of the first 3 to sign up 1 as well. I am only missing 8 shows from summer/fall '89: 7/7, 7/9, 7/10, 7/12, 7/13, 7/15, 10/11 & 10/18. If anyone has SHN/FLAC versions and wants to start a vine, or trade, hey, let's do it!
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

...but I figured I'd ask my fellow viners and traders to let me know if you have an extra ticket for EITHER night of the Radio City shows. Why would you do this? You'll get face value, a good beer on me, AND you get to meet me in person! PM me if you have one. Thanks!
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

Wish you were heading out west to my neck of the woods for the end of the tour! "Here's my half a dollar if you dare .. double twist when you hit the air. Look at Julie down below .. the levee doing the dopaso"
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

of the Compendium's reviews. What I read sometimes furls my brow. However, I recognize that there are a variety of tastes regarding the eras of this wonderful band. However, hyperbole AND distain? Please. The Truth is realized in an instant, the act is practiced step by step.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Received from Raymond--you are truly a kind Head-- and gave them a listen. They are both fine shows. I can definitely understand why a lot of people think very highly of these two nights, especially with the boys breaking out a lot of special material. I will listen to them again in the future. However, for my tastes I still prefer to listen to earlier eras. In my subjective view, the band --especially Jerry-- was tighter, more imaginative and energetic even in a mediocre show from 1977 or 1972 or 1968 or 73, etc. Well, you get the picture. That is even without considering the condition of Jerry's voice. Again, it is all a matter of taste and I think it is wonderful that many Heads love the later stuff. "That path is for, your steps alone."
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

I was thinking that it would be easier and cheaper if, instead of the seeder burning WAV CD's for each show, that he/she (hey, Rider might seed something!) include the WAV files on the DVD. A show in both FLAC/SHN and WAV fits on a single DVD. I usually get 50 CD's for about $9 and 50 DVD's for $13, maybe a little cheaper, so it is actually cheaper to put the WAV files on 1 DVD rather than 3 CD's. This way, the FLACless can enjoy the vine too, and we don't have to pay the postage for a heavier package. Of course, the FLACless must have a DVD player so they can at least read the files. Any thoughts from the FLACless?
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years
Permalink

I think that sounds like a good idea. That way the flacless would get the text document with the set and lineage info . of course if one wanted to do a multi show vine it would have to be on muti DVD`s. and that would put an end to converting and extra postage. I actualy passed on a few vines that got converted becuz of the extra weight .
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Recently, I've been seeing more and more 24-bit posts of classic shows on the Archive - could this format be the WAV of the future? " Where does the time go? "
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

Than being flac-less. I don't mean this is in a bad way or anything but I do understand if one doesn't have a DVD burner and usually that is how flac/shn are delivered is on dvd. But what I don't understand is why the flacless cannot convert flac/shn to wav. Conversion is just too easy to do for it to be a problem and limitation. My point is if we want to reduce postage costs (yes I do) the best thing is flac/shn on dvd but it makes more sense to me to put flac/shn on CD's rather than on dvd's instead of putting wav onto dvd if our goal is to look out for our friends with limitations. Because I just don't think flac-less should be a limitation. Anyways, just my opinion, in the end I don't mind how we do this vining stuff, I'm just glad it is here for us all to enjoy no matter what are media preferences :-) "Here's my half a dollar if you dare .. double twist when you hit the air. Look at Julie down below .. the levee doing the dopaso"
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

I don't think you need to have a DVD burner to read DVD's. Hippy doesn't have a DVD burner but still does FLAC because his drive can at least read DVD's. FLACless, please comment
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years
Permalink

In the past I have educated a few people on the how too`s of converting . personally I prefer dvd because i just copy straigh into a hard drive then burn later . but yes whatever media is fine with me . I too am just happy to have a place and kind folks to do this vine stuff with !!
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

Like I said, I am on board with whatever format people choose. "Here's my half a dollar if you dare .. double twist when you hit the air. Look at Julie down below .. the levee doing the dopaso"
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

can sound fantastic Witness the mindboggling 24 Bit versions of the of the fabulous April 71 shows that are appearing these days (the latest is 4-26-71). The main drawbacks are that the files are MUCH bigger and you cannot convert them to WAV (without losing all the audio benefits). And of course the audio source must be of good quality to be be able to make a difference. To listen you have two main choices Play through a 24 Sound Card or Digital Audio Converter. Your PC is unlikely to have such a thing internally. I have an external 24 Bit box that sits between my computer and my hi-fi. Its not the best you can get but it does the job. Burn to an Audio DVD or Video DVD and play through a suitable player. You can find out much more about entering the world of 24 bit by reading this http://24bit.turtleside.com/ and through this discussion http://www.shnflac.net/forum.php?action=viewtopic&topicid=10231 WOW as I write I see that a new 24 Bit Matrix of 74-6-23 Jai Alai Fronton has just appeared.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Posted today 8 Feb 2010
user picture

Member for

17 years 6 months
Permalink

to say that having had to learn flac conversion for the vine currently in my possession, I tore my hair for about half an hour (much of that devoted to downloading a free program that didn't work, but the shareware SoundConverter seems to work fine and was worth the 14 bucks) and after that it was all pretty clear sailing. And my new computer (sigh...) has a good DVD drive. I do agree that the lack of a DVD drive is a more formidable obstacle for many folks than the conversion itself.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

on my computer, which is what I have done with several 'flac only' offerings.. Computer does recognize DVDs & somehow I was able to even listen to them a couple weeks ago (can't figure it out right now how I did that, however). Hope to convert those DVDs soon (esp. my Dr. John vine) as I do have several waiting. Lopezz sent me some programs to help with my converting some of the flac DVDs that I have gotten from here (and elsewhere). I hope to get to this process, possibly this weekend if I can get computer time from wife (work) and son (school). I recognize the cost issue as far as sending stuff out. I feel like it is fair with all the wonderful & transportive music I am getting. But I will figure it out. Even with my flintsonean skill level. ;o} marye, what do I do without any hair to pull out? Teachers open the door, but you must enter by yourself.
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

Just kidding man its all good, do whatever is easiest for you. And cosmicbadger - wow you have all the cool little gadgets, gizmos and other computer and stereo enhancements .. that's awesome man! I'm just happy with my iPod or listening to cd's on my little boom box. actually most of my music time is in the car on the daily commute .. but some day ... I'll get a sweet sound system... some day.. "Here's my half a dollar if you dare .. double twist when you hit the air. Look at Julie down below .. the levee doing the dopaso"
user picture

Member for

16 years 6 months
Permalink

cosmicbadger --Thanks for all your work I don't know about you folks, but there are a lot of missing or stalled vines. I wish MITD was here to sort it all out.
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

Summer 72 will be next, probably a SHN/FLAC only vine. Off the top of my head. 7/16, 7/25, 7/26, 8/20/ 8/21 and possibly 8/22 and 8/24 (still have to listen to the last 2). Summer 72 is often disparaged, but the Other One's and Dark Stars are always exquisite, and, while the boys may take a song or 2 off, there is some delightful music in every show I have listened to.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years
Permalink

Did anyone hear about this ? 7-7-89 Release date: 03.30.10 I don`t know if it will be a DVD or just a soundboard CD .
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

picked up this: "Grateful Dead Productions will release a 3CD/1DVD Grateful Dead set called Crimson, White & Indigo: July 7, 1989 - JFK Stadium, Philadelphia, planning its release for March 30."
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

Today I gathered up all the vines I need to mail out, put them in their appropriate envelopes, sealed them all up nice and secure, put them into my truck, found my keys, drove all the way to the post office, parked, gathered up all the packages, walked into the post office all just to remember that it is closed today!! Happy President's Day! "Here's my half a dollar if you dare .. double twist when you hit the air. Look at Julie down below .. the levee doing the dopaso"
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Would there be any interest in vines containing 24bit/96kHz versions of some classic GD shows. These are sonically a great leap forward. Quite a few are appearing now and some of them sound simply amazing. However getting into 24 Bit requires another leap of technology. These are huge files ( 1 show fits on one DVD) and you cannot burn them to CDs. You need some reasonable sound equipment to be able to appreciate the sonic upgrade and you may require some investment to make it work for you. If you already have a 24Bit sound card or a DVD burner and a good quality DVD player you should be ready to go. I managed to get all the bits I needed to make the leap for around $50. Here are two links that give you an idea of what would be required http://www.pristineclassical.com/More/FLAC-24bit.html http://24bit.turtleside.com/ So the proposal is to start a 24 Bit vine that includes detailed instructions and web links showing you what to do. The first would be the jawdroppingly good new 24 Bit Charlie Miller version of April 29 1971 which has to be heard to be believed. If there is enough interest I will set it in motion. If not...well you won't know what you are missing :-) Please post if you are interested. CB
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years
Permalink

Hey Badger , That sounds good to me ! I downloaded some 24 Bit and it does sound really sweet !! I play it on my DVD player through my wal-mart suround systme , it works pretty well . In fact Neil Youngs new releases come with a standard CD and a 24 bit audio DVD.
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

I'm listening to 2/22/80 right now, amazing show. Not sure which vine this came on, perhaps as a bonus show to something. Many of us have the After Midnight release (2/28/80). I looked on setlist.com and much of the show is graded very well. A seed of the entire month, sans 2/22 and 2/28, would be much appreciated by this viner. Downloaders?
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

correction: MOST of the month is graded well on setlist
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years
Permalink

I just looked in one HD and found 47G worth . Including the shows you mentioned dstache. It would all fit onto 10 or 11 DVD`s and thats only in one of my drives . where would you like for me to start ?
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

2/22/80 and the late show of 2/29/80 on Random Jerry Vine part 1. I hear ya though - Feb 1980 was a great month. I'd love to get more shows from that period.. "Here's my half a dollar if you dare .. double twist when you hit the air. Look at Julie down below .. the levee doing the dopaso"
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

The east coast tour was from 2/12 - 3/1 so I think that would be a good vine (skipping 2/22 and 2/28). I say you give that a go and if it is well-received, and you are up for it, you can vine the other 80 shows you have. Thanks Stuman! Re: 2/22, I didn't get it from that vine I don't think 'straw.
user picture

Member for

17 years 2 months
Permalink

I see your vine now, 'straw. You vined 2/29 and 3/1, so you could omit those from your vine, Stuman. If you have extra room on a DVD I suggest putting in one or more of the SF shows before or after the east coast tour.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Yes, Badger, one show - the 29th April, 1971 would do it. Please, let it roll. Thanks for youroffer. " Where does the time go? "