• 2,395 replies
    heatherlew
    Default Avatar
    Joined:

    The unexpected return of the masters of the Grateful Dead's triumphant show at the Albuquerque Civic Auditorium, November 17, 1971, yields great rewards. The Dead came in HOT for their first New Mexico show. Aided by clarity and precision and abetted by confidence and focus, they finessed old standards with definitive takes. With Keith now blending in seamlessly on keys, the first set offered up a triple shot of electric Blues, an exceptional "You Win Again," and a stellar "One More Saturday Night" to wrap things up. And the second set, well, it might just be unlike any you've ever heard. Archivist David Lemieux urges you to turn it up and do it loudly. We won't dare spoil all the surprises, but pay special attention to the rippin' "Sugar Magnolia," the aggressively monstrous "The Other One," and the highly-danceable "Not Fade>GDTRFB>Not Fade." Rounding out the 3CDs, you'll find selections from Pigpen's return tour at Ann Arbor, MI, 12/14/71. Subscribers will get nearly all of the complete show as this year's bonus disc.

    As always, Dave's Picks Volume 26 has been mastered to HDCD specs from the original analog tapes by Jeffrey Norman and is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

    *Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    RE: Oxford 88
    I think the connection Jerry had with Brent really had a lot to do with his perhaps giving up a bit....Just watch the 89/90 videos and it’s like they have a bromance going on. The looks and smiles back and forth, which coincidentally are during some of the bands best work EVER! (Go ahead and hate 70s only crew!) He did it sometimes with Bruce, but not so much with Vince. Eventually it seemed like Jerry mostly turned his back completely on Vince, body language doesn’t lie.... I think they should of taken time off after Brent died, like they did in 74-76. I realize about the corporation etc, but when he died most everyone lost their job anyway, so that didn’t work out so well did it? Yeah Brent and Jer had this great bond and not only did he lose his Keyboardist, he lost yet another Brother, and perhaps how he died etc being such a waste, maybe that really bummed JG out too.... Many here bash on Brentski, but more and more the band etc say what a great singer and player he was. Yes, just like ALL THE OTHERS he too had some quirks and when he was bad, well....but you name any show, from any era, and I can find stuff that is ruff, or poorly sang/played!
  • Cousins Of The…
    Joined:
    A shame? Really?
    "It’s a shame so many of you seem imho, closed minded" It's really annoying when people call other people close minded when they disagree with their tastes.
  • Mytime
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Is it a big box or a little box?
    How much should I start putting aside?
  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    Dark Stars
    Indeed, Mr Stoltzfus, Tao, tap, tap, is thing turned on.....”WE NEED MORE DARK STARS”TOO is great and all, but it’s not Dark Star! The one, the only, the omnipotent GD at its best!
  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    Catching up
    Wow, you all been busy here the last few days. Unfortunately I’ve only had time to peak in from time to time.....Schlepping books & furniture; Packing/moving/emptying house so as to be able to show/sell.....also was partying hard at our little town 4th annual Bonfire Brewing block party... (sorry, you tube offline? So no link....) zxtttxz; Shoreline; love it but I think I liked the layout and vibe at Cal Expo better? How bout a 6/8-10 and 15-18/90 box, sans 16th as that was released.... Jim et el; like many, I was starting to move on by the time it ended. Hell I always tried to catch as many shows “as reasonably possible” but that meant having to balance regular life/work/money etc so my numbers were never huge.... As the music started to suffer, and the scene was often too big and too lame, and I was returning to collage in my thirties, I had began a natural progression that was basically I didn’t go unless it was easy/close and/or it was at a place I really dug. So really stopped traveling etc by 93....only saw 6 shows between 93 and the end.... When JG died it was hard, but it was almost a relief, like “ok, that’s over, now I can move on....” Which it sounds like you did also? I Actually worked merch on 96 Furthur Fest and would check in at easy/local other ones, dead, P&F etc.....but generally I switched gears big time, especially with my listening habits....so really was only interested in getting/hearing shows I was at....was kinda burnt on the dead for a while.... But due to my merch connections, I’ve been fortunate to see many great P&F, Futhur, the dead etc shows over the years at these awesome CO venues that I unfortunately did not see the GD at. ....will see D&C again in Boulder because it’s only a couple hours away, I have free lodging, and don’t have to drive etc. it’s also been (so far) a super chill vibe....though it is tough having to purchase tix after so many years of VIP etc, don’t think the actual tix are too outrageous compared to mainstream acts (same as they always were), but th3 service charges are a f#&*4$ joke! So although “it’s not the same”, I’ve actually seen some music on occasion that was as good as or better than some of the dead’s lackluster outings. Some of the late 90s P&F shows at the Philmore were amazing; Viola Lee, St Stephen, Dark Star etc, stuff we didn’t get to see live much, or at all! and I always thought Warren did a great job with the old blused based stuff, pigpen and even some Brent tunes. So why go? Jim said it all nicely; of course it’s not the same, was it ever? So what, it’s still fun and great to hang with all y’all and the music still kicks ass, PERIOD! It always has been worth the effort, and usually what ever they give us is still way better then most of the other crap out there, that costs even more, in shitty venues, with obnoxious, clueless crowds! I don’t see how people can dig phish so much but diss D&C? It’s a shame so many of you seem imho, closed minded about bands/eras etc,....it’s all been great some way or another! Even the FTW cash grab.... Same thing logistically with that; was not going to by tix, planes, hotels etc to go to Chicago (no offense) and stand in the back of a stadium etc. and Trey.....nothing against the dude, and he did a great job of trying to do an impossible job with no practice etc, but they could of done so much better.... I think they should of had a cast of guitar players; Warren for a bit, perhaps Trey for a couple, Campbell, Jimmy, helll they should of let Kimock up there too. I really think if you look at all the guys that have played the Guitar over the ensuing years, Trey was perhaps the least choice. Again, nothing against him! I really think they should of had junior Jerry. Imho, I think the Furthur lineup was one of the best, and that’s saying something because all the various groups were good.... I think Bill dissing John K.was so lame and rude...what, Trey wasn’t a “fake Jerry” in a cover band, how ironic! Let’s face it, they were worried they weren’t going to fill that giant stadium 3 nights, so they thought bringing in Trey, and Hornsby would help fill seats.....of course who knew there’d be such demand. But as I think icecrmcnkd said, just the tip etc. unfortunately they were not prepared enough, and a “tour” or perhaps a location or 2 of more blocks of shows would of perhaps been better all the way around? But again, it was still great, and lots of fun gathering with the crew and watching, I remember really enjoying the whole process and vide leading up too etc., THAT part was just as fun as the old days. I personally really like the SC “60s” show even if it was more sloppy than Chi town... One of these days there will be little or nothing to go see/hear and then all y’all will really have something to bitch about. ICECRMCNKD et el; I liked your comment about it did not matter as much about the rest of the band, but if one of the three guys with guitars in hand left there would be no GD. I think that’s really the crux of the thing....and as far as the band without Jerry....I think Phil said they were all like spokes on a wheel, but Jerry was the center frame that held it all together.... DAVEROCK; agree with...artists, hell many creative people, even just shrubs like some of us, no matter how well we do our jobs or whatever, there can be the feeling that we could of done better...... I build/design/install custom AV systems and Racks for the rich and sometimes famous, and no matter how well I do, I can always point out ways it could have been better! You often hear musicians, even the dead, say that it just kills them when they know they sucked, but people go nuts anyway......when I played people would do that after shows, and it was sometimes hard to be nice etc, like “what, are you kidding me? Did you actually hear any of that dog shit?” But of course as a musician you should never lose sight of the fact that if these nice people did not support your band, you’d have no gig! SETH BOX; “unlike anything we’ve done before....” that is very interesting isn’t it? How about making whole tours available, but letting us say pick seven shows of our choice? Could market it like different levels of product at different price points, depending on how much someone is into it etc..... Ok, back to work.
  • bolo24
    Joined:
    Box set announcement!!
    Yes, a box set will be released this year. Thank you.
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Box 2018
    I would bet they do it soon too. Perhaps around the 4th of July, if not before. They have already made the selection.. It's either being Normanized or slated to be Normanized.. they are deciding on the packaging and layout. Why wait?
  • dissident1980
    Joined:
    Box 2018
    They'll announce the box much sooner than MUATM ... MUATM will have one of those 2-minute promos showing some guy opening the box and showcasing what's inside.
  • stoltzfus
    Joined:
    my redundant gripe:
    why are the women (in my family) SO SLOW to get out the door in the morning? movie quote: "inconceivable!"
  • stoltzfus
    Joined:
    6/5 6 7/70
    nice box set there although I don't think there is a Dark Star more Dark Stars, please
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years 11 months

The unexpected return of the masters of the Grateful Dead's triumphant show at the Albuquerque Civic Auditorium, November 17, 1971, yields great rewards. The Dead came in HOT for their first New Mexico show. Aided by clarity and precision and abetted by confidence and focus, they finessed old standards with definitive takes. With Keith now blending in seamlessly on keys, the first set offered up a triple shot of electric Blues, an exceptional "You Win Again," and a stellar "One More Saturday Night" to wrap things up. And the second set, well, it might just be unlike any you've ever heard. Archivist David Lemieux urges you to turn it up and do it loudly. We won't dare spoil all the surprises, but pay special attention to the rippin' "Sugar Magnolia," the aggressively monstrous "The Other One," and the highly-danceable "Not Fade>GDTRFB>Not Fade." Rounding out the 3CDs, you'll find selections from Pigpen's return tour at Ann Arbor, MI, 12/14/71. Subscribers will get nearly all of the complete show as this year's bonus disc.

As always, Dave's Picks Volume 26 has been mastered to HDCD specs from the original analog tapes by Jeffrey Norman and is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

*Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 3 months
Permalink

would be great to get out 2/23/74, just missed by DaP 13, just thirteen picks ago
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

Wouldn't that be fantastic? Although QRP seems to have the lock on 200g pressings and the Dead vinyl has been 180g from RTI. Either way it would be most appreciated if they cut it AAA as they did for the WB vinyl box at Grundman's. Now that sounds special. And a tip-on sleeve from Stoughton. So, how about either a 180g RTI cut AAA at BG's or....a 200g QRP cut AAA by Kevin Gray?
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

David Lemieux's continued marketing of limited releases remains the most idiotic business model ever practiced by the Grateful Dead. He should retire and leave it to someone who cares more about the Deadheads. Byrd - with finger in the air
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 9 months
Permalink

Dave speaks highly for the NFA>GDTRFB>NFA on Dave's Picks 26. I have to agree, it's way up there, close to rivaling what has always been my favorite NFA>GDTRFB>NFA, Oct 31, 1971 (Dick's Picks 2), which has an awesome transition from GDTR to NFA. Both shows have similar styles with loads of energy; and it has always been among their best in my opinion.
user picture

Member for

6 years 10 months
Permalink

Byrd, I couldn't agree with you more - idiocy does run rampant once again, but you're the idiot. It doesn't take a rocket scientist or even a business major to understand why the Dave's Picks business model works. I suppose you have a plan that will increase sales by a third (as Rhino has done) without leaving stock on the shelf. If you're going to bad mouth someone in their own house, at least have a valid point to make. I suppose you're complaining because you missed out. Get a subscription jackazz.
user picture

Member for

9 years 6 months
Permalink

I think I see at least one bearded skeleton in those balloons....
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 5 months
Permalink

I'm usually the one who takes heat for pointing out the real world. As for those who were surprised how fast it sold out????? You're kidding right? I was surprised the sub didn't sell out. Bolo Doors v Who split decision. For a high energy live show the early Who for a quality catalogue for listen to on the home stereo Doors hands down
user picture

Member for

14 years 8 months
Permalink

Doors subscribe sell out in minutes, not hours Dave doesn't run the whole show...he is merely the face of the Rhino juggernaut subscribe "I willllll subscribe" speaking of Doors: "true a la carte is dead" subscribe I learned the hard way, too. subscribe.
user picture

Member for

13 years 4 months
Permalink

I really like the balloons... and the color scheme is nice too! Looking forward to this one, (though thanks to the good Doc, I am pretty familiar with Ann Arbor - not that hearing it again all Normanized is going to be any kind of problem.) On another note, an old head friend of mine turned me on to the April 84 Hampton shows (4/13 and 14). Both are on the shorter side, but the playing is HOT! 84 is a year I often overlook, but I am mending my ways. Peace
user picture

Member for

6 years 8 months
Permalink

And yet I bet the bitching still abounds. 'Cause, you know, it's all so damn unfair.
user picture

Member for

6 years 5 months
Permalink

i'll take the doors. the who has some certain song material that just makes me cringe, and barely contain the vomit that rises in my throat.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 5 months
Permalink

I dont know, that one with the hat on in the lowest hanging balloon looks like it may have a beard. My guess is though, that the bonus disc will be covered with bearded clams - I mean skeletons!
user picture

Member for

13 years 3 months
Permalink

I took this as a clue to the upcoming Box Set contents myself.. but I can never figure Bolo out.. The Doors borrowed their name from Huxley's book The Doors of Perception about a Mescaline trip in 1954. Who opens doors? Mescaline Sulfate perhaps? The only Mescaline show I know of has already been released (5/11/78, Springfield on Dicks Picks 25). There's got to be more to this post then stirring up discussion... I bet it ties to the other two posts, '7 and bacon', 'No 14' and now this 'The Who or The Doors'??? mmmmmmmmm........ What, the bearded skeletons are back? Like the last release, I like the colors and I took a hot air balloon ride over a desert near Albuquerque at a company function, so it resonates with me...
user picture

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

4/16/72 Get Some.
user picture

Member for

13 years 3 months
Permalink

Just finished it about an hour ago..
user picture

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

....listening right now. Kinda in the background, but I'm listening. Cumberland just started. Boiiiiing!
user picture

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

Hey Dave (if you read this) Any chance of releasing any of the NRPS sets when they opened for the Dead? Either with or without Garcia? Thanx.
user picture

Member for

8 years 11 months
Permalink

China Cat just started for me....
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 5 months
Permalink

Ha interesting reaction to the who. You might not have got it from my post but I was far from as big a fan as my friends were though I did like the early days who. What songs were most shall we say puke provoking to you. I started Townsend's auto a year ago. Serious vomit material. I read a lot, have a large library I not only stopped reading halfway which I rarely do I threw it away which I never do
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 5 months
Permalink

Very interesting hearing from Dave their policy on bonus discs and cover somgs. Somewhat limiting
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 5 months
Permalink

Got to admit outside a couple of songs always hated Tommy. Quad was ok
user picture

Member for

10 years 8 months
Permalink

I know some of you purposely avoid listening to these, so the whole experience is brand new. So, you can skip this post, or let it tantalize you at your own risk. The sound on the 11/17 tracks is just fantastic! What a great recording by Betty or Rex, and a great mix by Mr. Norman. The band sounds really fired up. I'm more excited for this release after checking this out and the video with Dave's usual overly effusive ebullience. Looking forward to 2 Other Ones, especially with that kind of talk of Bob and Phil playing aggressively. The whole thing about covers on the bonus disc makes sense, but those 2 examples from years back are definitely not public domain, Smokestack is credited to Howlin' Wolf, and Good Lovin' is credited to Rudy Clark and Arthur Resnick, maybe Rhino heard from a lawyer or two since then. Perusing a few of the Road Trips, they have Lovelight as a fairly popular bonus disc track, Not Fade Away shows up, Hard to Handle, a Sing Me Back Home, etc. This site allows one to quickly search the tracklists: https://www.whitegum.com/bonus.htm Also, The Who are, to me, the greatest rock band of them all. The Dead are my pick as the best American rock band, and their varied setlists make engaging in such recording hoarding a much more addictive venture, though I have about all The Who live recordings and studio stuff, outtakes, the Townshend demos (which if you don't know about them, his demos of him recording at his home studio are just astounding on their own, they are fully realized tracks with a straighter, more basic drum and bass playing, and Pete singing everything, and they've been officially released in the Scoop series, well worth getting), but their is a more finite amount of releases than with the Dead. With the Dead, I get at least 4 new shows, perhaps a box or two with some cool extras. And the ever changing setlists and ways of playing songs and the explorations of the Dead have me listening at work and in the car most of the time, but I could just as easily fall down a several week rabbit hole of Who, with lots of repetition, or go off on a Duane Allman listening excursion for a month, or split time with String Cheese and Dead, but the mainstay is Dead. So, shorter answer Who over Doors. Thus ends the rant. Carry on with fervor for Dave's 26, and SUBSCRIBE in November and avoid the pains of scrambling for 200 or 300 copies.
user picture

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

I like both bands. Some deeper comparisons.... Robby Kreiger vs Pete Townsend Both are iconic guitar players. I think Pete Townsends strengths are with his theatrical presence, a riff master and coming from Europe, perhaps a more classical music sensibility, where Robby Kreiger comes from a background of blues, jazz, flamenco and soul. Might have to give Robby Kreiger the edge here. Keith Moon vs John Densmore Hands down, Keith Moon at his best was pretty phenominal. Sure, he had the famous incident where he got to high on pills to play, but at his best, right up there with the greatest rock drummers. Densmore is more of a finesse soft touch player, but still great. Roger Daltry vs Jim Morrison Daltry always seems like the consumate professional. Still belts it out. His lyrics tend to take themselves less seriously. Morrison the poet certainly had his merits as a lyracist and at his best, a decent vocalist, when he wasn't fried. Certainly unpredictable and by todays standards would have probably been considered bipolar. Still, both iconic. Probably give Daltry the overall props here. Entwisle vs Ray Manzarek's left hand Obviously Entwhistle, because, he was a bass player. Huge part of the Who's sound. Albums I suppose the Who has a more iconic catalogue. High production value. The Doors first three albums and LA Woman are iconic as well. Probably overall, The Who wins out for me, but I do like Waiting for the Sun and Strange Days a lot. Apples and oranges in many ways. Now if someone were to draw comparisons to Jimi Hendrix, it would be hard for me not to put him at the very top of the 60's rock and roll food chain. Electric Ladyland may be the best album by any artists from any era....ever....imho. Clapton vs Beck vs Page Jeff Beck all the way. BB King vs Freddie King vs Albert King No debate. All three are essential, especially for blues. Coltrane vs Miles At this point, why even compare?
user picture

Member for

8 years 5 months
Permalink

...it’s in a written clause, contract. It’s all about business...Like somebody once said, ‘Money beats soul’ ;)
user picture

Member for

6 years 5 months
Permalink

I don't hate The Who I didn't mean to give that impression. I just have a really hard time getting through "Fiddle About" on Tommy it grosses me the hell out. It always bothered me even when I first bought the album in 12th grade. and just recently I mean the whole line of "who is it? i'll rape it" or what not in Quadrophenia I was like what the good fuck?
user picture

Member for

6 years 11 months
Permalink

Hey snafu, I was never much of a Tommy fan, but had an extraordinary listening experience last week after hearing Keithfan's live track. Highly recommend it. Takes the best released performances and ties it all together in one track. The not so great songs are not there. There's a link on the Dave's 25 page.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 5 months
Permalink

Imagine a who book around the fiddle about and you have Townsend's book. It was sick.
user picture

Member for

7 years 7 months
Permalink

I dig the cocktail jazz that was the Doors at the end. Pete Townshend is an artist, he interprets subject matter and possibly as a catharsis releases it in his material. He wrote all the lyrics Roger just belted them out. New Dead, I don't usually even queue up Lemieux rambling on about all the minutiae concerning a given recording. I'll listen, and fill in the blanks myself. It goes quicker that way, I mean, does the guy seriously fire up a fat one before blathering on endlessly? Current listen: The Strange Remain, The Other Ones. The Grateful Dead never really left us, what with all the incarnations over the years. Yes, when Jerry got on the elevator it was an immeasurable loss, but the music continues.
user picture

Member for

15 years 1 month
Permalink

Not at my computer at time of ordering, I speak English, Spanish Italian and Athabaskan, (My Mothers language,,,aka Apache)...But I just couldn't understand this Dude...Hence the Phone call....CRAZY HUH !...PEACE....TOMAS....
user picture

Member for

15 years 1 month
Permalink

I was not at my Computer Vato....And the Smart Phone wasn't smart enough to Translate from Swahili or whatever He was speaking into English....But...I FINALLY got thru to him...I believe it's on it's way....PEACE....TOMAS.
user picture

Member for

11 years 11 months
Permalink

You cannot petition the Lord with prayer. Alltime great lyric amid a very cool song. Riders on the Storm The End When the Music's Over The Crystal Ship Peace Frog The Changeling Five to One All better than anything the Who ever did. The Who were very cool live. But for the energy they delivered, not for the content. The Dead had both.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

It’s art after all so we can all agree to disagree. It’s like whose better Picasso or Van Gogh. I’ll take The Who every day of the week. I said in an earlier post that I really dig the L.A Woman album, and I do. But I agree with the sentiment posted earlier that Quadrophenia is an album that stands head and shoulders over most. Play it loud and marvel at Moon and Entwistle driving the music. Listen to the lyrics and marvel at Townshend’s description of an insecure kid’s growing pains and angst. Townshend wrote unique songs from day one. Go back and listen to the Who’s first album, My Generation, and compare it to the Stones or the Beatles at the time. Also listen to the track The Ox - I don’t know why that doesn’t seem to get credit for the first use of recorded feedback. Another classic album in the early canon is The Who Sell Out. Who else could write Mary-Ann with the Shaky Hands. Pete is a genius lyricist, composer and player. And he was accompanied by the most powerful rhythm section and a great front man. Long live The Who in the studio and live. The one downside to the Who in the studio is the missing Lifehouse album that should have followed Who’s Next and been before Quadrophenia. It’s kind of like the Dead not having a great studio album after American Beauty and instead having a bunch of awesome songs instead appear on Garcia Ace Skull and Roses and Europe 72. Listen to the extended Odds and Sods and you can hear a lot of those great Who songs that were never put on a proper album.
user picture

Member for

6 years 5 months
Permalink

I had two copies of Morrison Hotel. one was a standard like 1990 edition. and the other was an expanded edition. well one day I took the standard case to a used cd store and sold it not really needing it. years later I open the expanded edition jewel case to find out for some reason the standard edition was put in the expanded edition jewel case by mistake.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 6 months
Permalink

Both bands were great but very one dimensional. It is really hard to listen either band for long periods.
user picture

Member for

14 years 7 months
Permalink

I've caught wind of some of Pete Townshend's issues, but haven't paid full attention to them, as I just want to enjoy his amazing music. Nothing against the Doors; I've never really listened to them. But the Who, with two good songwriters, and everyone an ace at whatever he did? Yes.
user picture

Member for

6 years 8 months
Permalink

"Lifehouse" wasn't intended to fall between "Who's Next" and "Quadrophenia". "Who's Next" was assembled from the remnants of "Lifehouse" after the project was abandoned. So essentially, it's "Lifehouse" condensed. And though it may only be bits and pieces of a bigger concept, it's still an amazing album. Hands down their best after "Quadrophenia".
user picture

Member for

10 years 1 month
Permalink

I give you Lifehouse: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1z9nXrpZ_5WxZfKW6pFc0YbQKXKuLXHoZ It only felt right to stick with studio versions, but truth be told, there's nothing that compares to the Isle of Wight 1970 performance of Heaven and Hell. Perhaps a bonus track one day :D P.S. - these are the best mixes of these songs. Like, Long Live Rock is the guitar mix, not the piano mix (if you're into such nuances); and Naked Eye is the original Odds 'N Sods version, not the Astley remaster where everything was all f***ed up.
user picture

Member for

6 years 8 months
Permalink

That's pretty fucking cool. Never knew the full list and order of songs.
user picture

Member for

6 years 8 months
Permalink

And for that brief moment, we were one...
user picture

Member for

13 years 10 months
Permalink

I have a subscription for Dave's Picks and glad I do. I have had to call about something, I ordered, and had someone on the phone that was "almost" impossible to understand. I agree with one of the people who, earlier, made a comment that you use to call the dead number and get a person who spoke....English.My nephew worked for Dell for years and said that when the company started using non-Engilish services to answer peoples questions about their computers it was the beginning of the end for Dell. Maybe it is time for us, as coustomers of Rhino, to start to complain about their phone service. I think, from the comments posted on this site, that it is VERY poor! If you have not had any issues that required a phone call consider yourself...lucky!! Mr. Pete---------> aging hippie
user picture

Member for

16 years 11 months
Permalink

Well at least I subscribe every year, I was going to get extras in hopes to sweeten trade for the new box/RSD, if I I miss out on those, the gentle sobbing and ghostly moaning you will hear on the evening wind...that's me. Im already anticipating a shit show on ordering. My baseline anxiety levels waiting for new boxes and the inevitable panic inducing ordering process grows every year. Did anyone have any ordering problems besides the fast sell-out. It would be nice if they fixed the server issues, or just put out on the Rhino site for ordering to start.
user picture

Member for

10 years
Permalink

I don't know about comparing The Who with The Doors-but both bands seemed to peak in their earlier years. The Who, to me, were far better in the 1960s than they were in the 1970s. In the 60s, there was nothing like them-and the songs they wrote were genuinely weird and transgressive. In the 1970s, they stopped being revolutionary-and started writing about being revolutionary. In the 60s they were the thing they wrote about being in the 1970s, when they just seemed to join the massive "rock" industry. High on professionalism and power and guitar solos, but lacking in inspiration. A lot of other bands were like that-great in the 60s, but a bit bloated in the 70s. You've only got to look at Pink Floyd. I'd take See Emily Play over any of their 1970s albums any day. To bring it back to The Dead, maybe they were one of the few bands around in the 60s who carried on developing in the 1970s. Maybe The Stones, too, for a couple of years.
user picture

Member for

10 years 1 month
Permalink

daverock I would agree with your statement about the Who, if you had said the change in their quality occurred after 1973; however, the Who of the 1970s produced Who's Next and Quadrophenia. The synths used on Baba O'Riley and Won't Get Fooled Again were the first of its kind, not only in sound (Townshend had to "invent" the tone of the synths on WGFA through creative experimentation, eventually feeding a Lowry organ through an ARP synthesizer); but in implementation as well (nobody had really used a synthesizer to create a rhythm backing track in a song before - pioneer type stuff). For that many can be thankful :D But yeah, things grew stale after Quadrophenia. I suspect even Pete would admit by 1978, they were singing the same old song (with a few new lines) ;-)
product sku
081227931605