• 1,815 replies
    heatherlew
    Default Avatar
    Joined:

    "The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

    And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

    Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

    *Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Well Said
    Right on VGuy. It is what it is.. and it's good.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope.....
    ....with a Makisupa thrown in just to keep it interesting. Rewatching it now. Kush.And why does one ponder on Rhinos and Dave's decisions? I will keep subscribing until the end. Stop worrying about what other people think. That's a problem with society today. Whether it be music or anything else. Grow a pair and either crank it or shelve it and stop worrying about everyone else. My son is hooked on reaction videos. Trying to break that chain. To let some random soul decide or sway what you think of something is dangerous. Think for yourself. That's a concept that is disappearing in this day and age. I've seen the future, and it's leaning towards one not being a one, but sliding into a hivemind. There was a Black Mirror episode that nailed it. If your not a five star, your trash. Wait for it.
  • dreading
    Joined:
    Kayak Guy
    I was enjoying your post until I got to this part: you wrote "to say this music is unworthy of release is wrong. the whole idea of Dave's Picks is to take whats left from the vault and put out the whole shows in the best quality possible and people that subscribe should understand this" According to Dave, Dave's Picks is for the best in quality shows from an audio and performance stand point. Many do not feel this standard was met, nor did they for DaP 20. Boise doesn't pass the litmus test from either angle from way more people than usual for a release. DaP 8 didn't have a backlash like this. THAT'S a great show that sounds great. Boise is worthy of release for a DL series or standalone, but certainly not a DaP release, based on Dave and Rhino's mission statement of audio quality and performance quality FIRST. So why did they do it? I think Dave and Rhino know that they wouldn't sell as many units as a standalone show outside the Dave's Picks series (or they felt they could possibly lose money). By releasing it as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, they satisfy a contingency of subscribers who have been complaining over the lack of early 80s. And there is little to no risk for Rhino to put it out there as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, since the subscriptions are already paid for. The risk element will change if they go with 80s/90s for DaP 28/29 and the shows aren't DaP 8 quality grand slams. But as is, I think it's relatively low risk, even with the large number of complaints about audio and performance issues. If DaP 28 is 80s/90s and the announcement for 2019 subscriptions features 80s/90s, I imagine a drop off in subscriptions would result. But I don't think that will happen, they're not there yet. I believe Dave and Rhino know they were in a tough spot with the early 80s. They could potentially lose the support of some subscribers by continuing to ignore this period, or they could roll the dice with a show that isn't up to the standard of audio and performance quality that Dave's Picks has been so far, and reach for a happy medium. I think that's what they did and that's what they achieved (not because they didn't want to release a grand slam from 1983, but because, as we've been hearing over and over, there simply aren't good tapes available from this period). This show is a win for them in the short term. If they return to "business as usual" with the 60s and 70s, they will keep their 18K subscribers, and probably continue to increase the yearly subscription numbers. If they go 80s / 90s for 28 & 29, subscription sales will probably drop off, as the comments here clearly demonstrate there are large numbers of people who do not think this show passes the litmus test for audio and performance quality (I believe the releases will still sell out, just not as quickly, as most of the 18K goes to subscribers). While it's great that a lot of people liked this release, it's irrelevant in the face of the negative feedback. ENOUGH people wrote in to say it doesn't pass the litmus test. "Enough" does not have to be a majority, merely a quorum. How do we know this? Because the dissenters for this release are out in record numbers (as well as for DaP 20, after which it took two years for another 80s show to be released). And people do have a right to say this show is unworthy of release for a Dave's Picks. There's no getting around the mission statement Dave and Rhino made and often repeat, indicating the best audio and performance quality shows would be the Dave's Picks standard. They came up short here, and the people have spoken. There are clearly other shows that could have been released in its stead, just maybe not from '83. One of the RFK shows from '89 would have met the Dave's standard, but it's a multi-track, they sound tight, and there is greater profit to be made putting that one out as an individual release. That being said, I think I would have done the same thing Rhino did here, given the point in the road they find themselves (they can't ignore the early 80s forever without losing some subscribers). The real problem here is that they also said they would represent all eras, but they (apparentky) do not truly have the tapes to do so. My points are simply: 1) yes people DO have a right to say Boise '83 is unworthy of release as a Dave's Picks, because the mission statement was not met. Sure, one could try to argue that sound and performance quality are subjective, but too many people already agree this show came up short, so the polls are in and the numbers are significant. Further, there is NO Caveat Emptor on Dave's Picks. Dave has been saying since day one (and repeating often) that only the best sounding shows are slated for this series. If they start to put the Caveat Emptor you quoted from Dick's Picks on the Dave's Picks CDs and subscription advertisements, THEN we can expect something like Boise. You seemed a little bothered that people dinged this release for audio issues, but words were spoken, deals were made, and now there's a letdown. There ARE better sounding shows available, just maybe not from '83. It is you who should understand this point, not the other way around, where you imply that subscribers should have an awareness that sub-STANDARD audio is part of the deal. No. Standard is the operative word here, this release is unusually poor, and the complaints are coming in droves. 2) releasing something from this year was still the right choice for Rhino. As I said, the game for them is to continue to grow the subscriber base, and while DaP 27 is an encroachment on the mission statement, there are a significant number of subscribers who wanted it, and Rhino has now satisfied that contingency (for the time being). Strategy: give them their fill now, while there is still plenty of top shelf 70s on tap and arriving on doorsteps within a month's time. 3) point number 2 is only a good move for them if they get back to the 60s and 70s for DaP 28 and 29. There are still plenty of shows left to do so. Continuing with the 80s and 90s would be a mistake, if the goal is to keep their 18K and growing subscribers. 4) I think the real story here, is that the reality is just like Dave has been telling us for a long time now. There aren't too many shows from this. To choose from. I'm not expecting any Grand Slams from 1983 anytime soon. Dave clearly has some familiarity with this show, and I think he probably felt it was the best available. As a collective unit we asked for it and we got it.
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Big Box
    I like the big box.. but comparing it to FW69 or E72 is like comparing apple juice to hard cider. There is good stuff to be found in the big box. Continuing with your thread earlier today, I think at this point we know pretty much what's left in the vault to be released. I think their strategy is to wow us when necessary and at other times keep their power dry so they can live and fight for another day. So a mix with some greatness sprinkled in. Interesting.. they played 2/26/77, Swing Auditorium Santa Barbara today on Sirius today. Always the pleaser and a grade A show. There are so many A++ shows we now know exist in the vault. I think we know they are going to highlight them yet mix them in gingerly over time mixed with other, lesser known shows. I think that's how it's going to be. The Boxzilla model until they run out of releasable tapes in ~20 years? Frankly.. I'm ok with that, there is plenty of stellar stuff now left in the vault. My personal favorite release ever is the steamer trunk, but I still revisit the big box on occasion with enthusiasm. There is prime stuff in there. As for Cape Cod, it was a good show for '79.. but perhaps not the best of the year.
  • alvarhanso
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope
    Was pleasantly surprised by the Phish show the other night, this Runaway Antelope (with a stop from Makisupa Policeman) was vintage Phish, and mashed up 3 of their oldest songs, Runaway Jim, Run Like an Antelope, and Makisupa Policeman in an unplanned event. The looks on their faces as they go through it is priceless. I thought it was pre-planned from my spot on the lawn, but clearly they surprised themselves. It wasn't the best I've seen them, but it was very, very good. Hope those that watched the webcast here enjoyed it, sounds like Vguy did, and someone else who caught the bulk of the best stuff. First set was good, nothing outstanding. Second set was outstanding, and the encore was a good indicator they had fun. It was a bummer that they ended at 10:45 and clearly had another 15 minutes, but it was a great time with some old friends and some family having their first shows, including my buddy's 9 year old and his father in his 60s. Both had the time of their lives. Nearly 35 years ago, the people of Boise left feeling the same way. Music is a magical thing, and a really good band can make your problems dissolve away for 2-4 hours at a time, and also unite you with like minded people (who can still reasonably agree to disagree about nearly everything). The torch was lit long ago, but it still burns in towns across America and the world where these musical caravans trek seasonally. The music and spirit of the Dead live on. Speaking of which, it is now 26 days from September 7, and that means a treasure chest is being filled and readied for delivery soon. Wondrous surprises await! PS: Dave's Picks 6 has 2 excellent Dark Stars that are fantastic post-show traveling material. Also, We Bid You Goodnight takes on a very ominous feel in a driving thunderstorm with 60+ mph wind gusts.
  • Angry Jack Straw
    Joined:
    Led
    I would rather talk food than this release anyday. Just visited Leunig's Bistro. And old staple located in Burlington. Grabbed a plate of duck confit french fries and gravy with the wife, while the kids relished the truffle fries. Twice fried potatoes, silky gravy and fall apart mallard. Accompanied by a preserved lemon, basil and vodka lemonade. Right around the corner from Nectars, famous for their late night gravy fries and regularly hosting a band. Both highly overrated. Adirondacks and Lake Champlain to the fore, Green mountains to the aft. Good living. An East cosat version of Pearl Street in Boulder. Funny you mentioned the Cape Cod show. That was my first listen from TTATS. It got so much hype, I had to hear it. I found it kinda, meh, as well. I suspect the hype was nothing more than the band played Cape Cod. Not a bad show, just not outstanding. Enjoy your journey through the box. But at the end of the day, I think you will find yourself reaching for E72 more often than not after the initial few listens. Oh yeah. The Red Sox are rolling. Love it when yankee fan gets apoplectic.
  • Terrapin Moon
    Joined:
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad.
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad. If you want something bad: 10/30/83. weir is virtually non existent jerry will keep coming in and out. will not listen to this one again not worth the time. I cant even comment on playing cuz of it. I don't really feel like the playing is mediocre but due to the problems that plague this tape through out I can't ascertain that. Phish 2/13/87 would probly be more worthwhile than this one. I played it thinking hey maybe the mix would get better but then it got to the end of set I with Might As Well I was already in too deep and may as well be finished. it turned out to be a big lemon.
  • Deadicated
    Joined:
    Bear's Sonic Journals
    Should you be on the fence about the ABB, Fillmore East, February 1970 update, every pain has been taken to present it with the utmost quality. Jeffrey Norman, along with Plangent Processes, have made this an awesome release. Great liners and art work, too. Anything to add Hendrixfreak?
  • LedDed
    Joined:
    Paddy Melt
    I just had a paddy melt at a Red Sox/Patriots bar called, "The Elm," on Colfax Ave. in Denver. Colfax itself is worthy of a thesis. It went like this: I subbed out the onions for bacon, and the paddy was hand-formed and a true medium with a thin band of red in the middle. Marbled rye, swiss, and thousand island made this a delight along with a healthy, salted helping of freshly-cut pub chips. All washed down with Tito's and soda. Front row on 4/12/83 might be when you did die, Oro. Who knows if this is real or all a dream. Kayak nice stream of consciousness. You people are so much more entertaining, sincere and informative than the nightly news. I'll bet this room could solve most of the world's problems. But, no, wait... that was already done in the 1960s and nothing changed it's only gotten worse. Forget I mentioned it. I'm currently digesting that paddy by way of Cape Cod Coliseum, South Yarmouth, MA. October 27, 1979 on what was my then-eleventh birthday. Too bad I missed it. I've listened to at least one song and in good years, several from every 30 trips disc I've burned into iTunes over the last two days. This show is nothing remarkable, just Good 'Ol Grateful Dead. Which I suppose is remarkable in and of itself. I don't have enough wall space for all the posters and wall art that lies unframed in roll-up tubes as it is. I suppose I could add more. The Fillmore has an amazing collection of framed trippy posters of all the bands that have played there. Love that shit.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    My wife yelled at me....
    ....for apparently treating her like a child. So I gave her a sticker for standing up for herself.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years 1 month

"The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

*Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

user picture

Member for

12 years 7 months
Permalink

......it's ok. But if this is the best of the mid 80's that Dave can find..........YMMV
user picture

Member for

8 years
Permalink

This show from 83 is without question my least favorite Dave’s Picks. The band is clearly high on mass quantities of cocane. I’ve never heard anything like it. Every song is so fast they lack any groove or substance. Disc three is the only saving grace of this release. The jam out of space with Jerry and Bob is captivating and the band finally eases off on the gas pedal long enough to keep the show in our collection. Maybe Dave needs to get back to the great shows from the 60’s and 70’s next time. Peace
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

went to a "Zoo Tunes" show at (you guessed it) the zoo. X and Psychedelic Furs X RROOCCKKSS. what a great band. so much great rock n roll. Hall of Fame worthy. so good. yes. they should have been the headliners. Psychedelic Furs: some good tunes, and an overall good sound. Richard Butler has a great voice. A band I liked from a distance, but never "got into". overall a great time. of course, these bands formed when I was in 7th grade. 7th grade. 1977. wow. they didn't hit their respective strides until 1980 or a little later. but still.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years 6 months
Permalink

I tried again to listen to this show...It is an assault on my ears...Not only is the mix horrific there is no cohesion to the playing at all. The sum is definitely not greater than the parts...I too cannot understand why this would be released...I listened to 5-3-72 to cleanse the sonic palette...
user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

My listen has been on my computer system (good speakers, but not through my studio monitors), and mainly in the car. It's not my ears, it's the tapes. I'll take you at your word that the keyboards are lower on headphones, but I must ask do you really blast a show into your headphones as you would your stereo or in your car? I could check the sound on the living room stereo, but I don't think Jerry's guitar will suddenly spring into focus over Brent vamping, and I also doubt it will remove the Healy effects on the vocals. (I can't believe it took over 10 years of him adding that stuff to question him about it.) Just because somebody recorded something on reel to reel doesn't mean I have to listen to it that way for it to sound good. I don't buy that argument. Otherwise, I'd just find some old blank Maxells and dub this show and try it that way.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I fully agree with what you said including the bit where you said "Maybe/hopefully these again-available releases were withheld from initial sale as potential replacements. Who knows?". I hope you are right, but what nobody yet seems to have discovered is if these items actually do have a number printed on 'em. In the past some people who have received replacements for damaged sets have allegedly received unnumbered ones suggesting they are from a back-up stock. It remains to be seen if these WarnerMarket items are like this. There is also the question about when an item is sold out. If it is claimed to be a limited edition of, say, 18000 when do they say it is sold out? When they have received 18000 orders? Surely not, unless they have extra back-up stock for lost-in-the-post and damaged products. These would surely have to be unnumbered. Maybe they shut up shop when they have received 17500 orders and hold the remainder back as replacements. It is something we as mere punters are not privy to so it is hard to speculate on how the mighty Warner/Rhino machine works. Also, this appearance on Amazon begs the question: "Why now?".
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 6 months
Permalink

curious what else will appear on that page...definitely worth bookmarking. Hey maybe a Dave's Picks 1 will show up and some lucky guy will be in the right place at the right time (a man can dream).
user picture

Member for

8 years
Permalink

I make every effort not to think about how much we paid for Dave’s Picks 1 thru 10. Or all the box sets we missed first time around. Very glad we own them as we love it all, but it took a large amount of money to own em’. At least we’re caught up now and can own what’s going to come out from now on.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

It’s painful to see folks trying to “compare” these wildly different kinds of recordings.So perhaps I can give a bit of reference for those who don’t understand? (If you do, pardon moi) The two biggetst apples vs oranges things to consider are multi-track versus 2 track stereo, and the purpose of the mix involved. The stuff most all y’all love so much were purposely, consciously mixed to listen to more like a studio mix if you will; balanced guitars, vocals etc. Betty et el had separate feeds JUST for recording, to listen to later etc. The 80s stereo mixes etc were a feed off the soundboard of which the mix was for the live reinforcement of sound relative to the venue etc. Guitars are often so loud on stage, that not as much needs to be reinforced through the PA, while the voice doesn’t normally have a “loud amp” so they need to be more prominent in the mix.....voices and acoustic instruments are not as loud as “guitar amps”....if you’ve ever tried to have a conversation next to someone cranking an amp you understand this... Now out in the audience, preferably in front of the soundboard, everything sounds appropriate, balanced etc. That’s the purpose of a live reinforcement mix; to sound balanced and good in the audience, so one can hopefully fully appreciate each and every channel. Also, unless you have a multi-track mix, you cannot go back and change individual tracks later. This would be like trying to lower the level of the bass guiitar, on a stereo, 2 track album your plating in your living room. You can mess with the tone of the bass, but you can’t do much about how loud or soft it was mixed. That’s why multi-track releases usually sound better. Perfect example is Live Dead, Skull fuck and Europe 72. Though they were recorded live, because their multi-track recordings, they were able to go back and sweat-in up the vocals, and in some cases even do overdubs (redos). That’s how they added Merls organ on Skull Fuck. Nowadays with auto tune, they can go back and fix flat or sharp vocals. My guess is they’ve done that with some of the old 70 shows, and DG in particular... The multi-tracks tend to be what audio folks call more “airy,” they breathe more, there is not as much compression of all the different sources, so the instruments stand out better. There is also the matter of physics as related to the increased tape area of multi track to cassette, and the usually increased speed the multi’s were recorded at. This also makes a huge difference. They multi’s also don’t usually have much as far as effects on them. That is added later as need be, for different purposes, and usually more sparingly, another plus of Muliti. The live house mix has the same effects used by Healy to enhance the sound in the venue, not for your living room, and certainly not for your car.... Hopefully this helps to see how completely different these techniques are, and how their inherent characteristics based on their intended purposes make them so very different......also hope it helps understand how often the vocal to instrument balance can be so different too? One more notable fact. No soundboard recording, whether multi or stereo sounds exactly like the actual instruments recoded. Take Phil’s Alembic bass sounds on all the 70s releases everyone loves so much. As great as Beatty et el did, I’ve never heard a SB only mix that sounds what his rig really sounds like live in a actual hall. This is based on owning/using the same gear, and working with other musicians as a tech. There is Increased full freaquncy range live, versus the often overly middy sound of especially the Alembic basses direct....this is in part because a direct to tape mix does not incorporate all the other gear in the line; pre-Amps, eq, even the power amps can effect tone, especially more power. The great thing about huge amps isn’t that they can be louder, it’s that they have way more tone, or fuller sound, without having to be loud! So if you must compare, try to understand what your comparing. Of course with any audio, gear, speaker set up etc. the bottom line is YOUR point of reference and what YOU like. Also, the Dead played for thirty years, not four or seven....some of us want to hear as much of all years as reasonably possible. Obviously there are some shows that are better than others, and some years have much more consistency But that doesn’t mean there are not great shows from all years. The problem is mostly finding both great shows, that were recorded well that also sound great.... This is what Dave has alluded to. And yes, unfortunely, for much of the eighties these 2 track House mixes are all there is. I’m with the folks who would rather have a great show, even only from a house mix. As Eecktars rule of relativity states sometimes “a little bit of somethin’ is better than all of nothing” And hey, like some have said, If unfortunately you don’t dig some of this stuff a) don’t buy it, b) don’t listen, and/or c) sell it or pass it on “take what you need and leave the rest”! Remeber what I think Vguy said “ remember how bad old shitty cassettes with the hiss, wow, and flutter sounded” This perhaps is a fairer more reasonable comparison; old 2 track cassette soundboards to this type of release. Comparing Multi track recordings intended for remix, mastering and duplication for release I.e., 90 boxes, E72, Live Dead etc, to stereo cassettes based off of the house mix and intended more as a way to critique the house mix, is beyond apples and oranges ; )
user picture

Member for

10 years 2 months
Permalink

So we agree-neither of us like Bob's slide playing. I was speculating on why someone might like it. In so doing I was reframing his..unusual.. approach as being the result of experimentation , rather than poor technique. No big deal. I wasn't aware this was a cliché-I've never read anyone else saying that. Unsurprisingly!
user picture

Member for

15 years 1 month
Permalink

My problem with this release is Jerry's voice. It is shot. During Black Peter I thought Jerry was going to die before Peter does.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 7 months
Permalink

I concur Captain Kirk, on all points. Has anyone found a better Boise '83 recording to post on here yet? NO. Thank you
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

...One night the 96 year old draws a bath, puts his foot in and pauses. He yells down the stairs, "Was I getting in or out of the bath?" The 94 year old yells back, "I don't know, I'll come up and see." He starts up the stairs and pauses, then he yells, "Was I going up the stairs or coming down?" The 92 year old was sitting at the kitchen table having coffee listening to his brothers. He shakes his head and says, "I sure hope I never get that forgetful." He knocks on wood for good luck. He then yells, "I'll come up and help both of you as soon as I see who's at the door."
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

I liked the slide, eventually, once he became proficient....obviously not a virtuoso, but he did with slide like he did with everything else...his own way. Not going to argue that it didn’t sound worse than train brakes screeching or a cat in heat early on though!
user picture

Member for

10 years 5 months
Permalink

Very well 'splained! I needed that! ;-)
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

these 80's releases are a real novelty. I like all eras but this will get listened to probably only on the anniversary date. Sorry but like the Boulder release sound is not so great and to me it seems like they're going through the motions, not to mention at like triple time...? Maybe it was just me today or first listen or that I started the day and did enjoy 7/31/74 this morning...
user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

I've said it before and i'll say it again lol Rhino/Grateful Dead Productions are not responsible for your merchant business on ebay I find that market place shit fuckin hilarious
user picture

Member for

7 years 9 months
Permalink

I think it sounds fantastic, not sure what everybody else is hearing or not hearing but it sounds like they are live in my cave and that’s enough for me!
user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

if you need and want your digital copies of Dave's Picks to look fancy and have the fantastic artwork that is adorned on the covers, than look no further than www.albumartexchange.com it is free, but you will have to register to download artwork. if you don't register you will have a "watermark" on your artwork and it will look like poo poo
user picture

Member for

16 years
Permalink

Healy should have known that years later Dave would release this show and have made the perfect board tape.
user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

There is no debate about multitracks going on here as the Dave's and Dick's Picks were all 2 track recordings with the exception of Dave's 8 which is a 2 track plus an Audience recording for a Matrix. Healy's PA mixes are what sourced this show, and most of the 80s tapes, and, yes, that is a totally different animal than Betty's (or Owsley's or Rex's or Kidd's) 2 track reel to reel recordings that they mixed from a soundboard feed that probably included amp mics mixed into those 2 tracks. And it is this difference (plus the use of cassette masters) that many of us dread. Plus the PA mixes have to have vocals and keyboards pushed up front where that was much less an issue with Keith and a piano that couldn't be plugged in and prior sound rigs. This recording is good in having more low end than is normally heard on these 80s PA mixes, but that could be Mr. Norman's deft touch, rather than a stronger low end mix by Healy this particular night. Owsley denigrated Healy's mixing abilities, claiming "he couldn't mix a cake from a Betty Crocker package", and though I wouldn't go that far, his additions to vocals often detract, as they do here, to me, most obviously on Mama Tried and Big River. And Healy's effects are definitely on the 2 track recordings, because it went through the PA, so he mixed it in there. There may be less in 1983 than in 1988, but it's definitely there, and while it may work for something psychedelic like The Other One, it doesn't sound good on Mama Tried. At all. I totally get different recording techniques yield different results. I also get that Dave also said that this is a better sounding PA mix tape from the 80s, and while that may be completely true, it doesn't mean it's a great sounding tape. I'm not expecting it to sound like Dave's 21 4/2/73, but I don't see why any of us who do not like the sound of this Pick need to adjust our expectations or listen on headphones when we don't like how it spunds in our cars, on our stereos, or on our computers. When the AUD patch in Eyes hit, I thought that sounded good, and that they maybe should've gone Matrix again, though that wouldn't bring the guitars up much, and the vocals would still be well out front. If they want to put out more '80s-'90s shows, that's great. If they sound better than this. I actually would love for them to use the multitracks where they have them, so they can put out some of those later shows. That would give us great sound quality, and if it's picked, usually the playing quality is strong as well. If a crappy board tape surfaced of say 11/8/70 I wouldn't want to pay for it, even though that show is about at the top of my wish list, because I'd rather a somewhat lesser show with much better sound come out. Of course, that's just me, and I am not Rhino's only customer, and this isn't Duane-era ABB we're debating, where you literally have 80-100 tapes floating around in various quality, whereas the Dead have hundreds of high quality tapes, hundreds of mediocre tapes, and hundreds of incomplete or bad sounding tapes. On Phil's Alembic sound on tape versus live, I never got to see him playing the Alembics, so my reference for those is the tapes, and I love the sound that's captured. And it's funny you say that, because a Phish show I went to a few years ago, Mike Gordon onstage sounded just like Phil on tape in the '73-'74 period, and I thought he sounded great, and looked forward to hearing that tone on the board tapes later, but it was gone, replaced by the sound of his direct out and whatever mix the sound guy threw on there, so he sounded like Mike on tape, but live I was blown away by that wooden tone (that's always how I've described it) that sounded just like Phil.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....are we talking sound quality or performance. Other than the missed verse in Help On The Way, performance was fine for me. Other that the jarring aud splice in Eyes, quality is fine for me. My dogs ran out of the room though and hid under the bed. Should I be concerned?
user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

ok, lmao fourwindsbelow comment has been the funniest comment I've read in here second to a '90 show comment story that had me in tears of laughter. yeah, cuz these are two track tapes they were never recorded for commercial posterity. but just for reference to listen back to and see what worked and what didn't. any major enjoyment from these two track tapes is purely coincidental.
user picture

Member for

13 years 8 months
Permalink

Last time I saw Dave’s Picks 1 on Amazon, it was listed at nearly $6000.00. Obviously, I passed on it.
user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

mine came in today. I haven't played it but I have it ripped and im gonna tear into it after a jaunt on the treadmill with phish. but look I have heard some '70's shows also were jerry was low in the mix, whatever that one 72 dicks picks one is in NJ, whatever that '72 show for daves that's at the academy of music, the Waterbury show for 30 picks, and quite a few shows where jerry's guitar is kinda low for many estimated prophets in the late 70's. its just not 83 but sound quality is really subjective when you get down to it
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

I was able to listen to all of the show today except for Baby Blue. a hot show. again, it's not 11/19/72, but it's hot enough for me. I welcome the deeper foray into the 80s.
user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

That comment about Jerry sounding like he was going to die before Peter really hit my funny bone for some reason. Good one. Vguy, enjoyed the 3 brothers joke. Expecting my copy tomorrow.....
user picture

Member for

11 years 6 months
Permalink

This whole unearthing of "sold out" dave's picks on amazon does seem a little fishy to me. What could be the nature of this recent offering. It would be nice if someone in the know could offer some insight. Maybe Mary E. She seems to be somewhat of an insider. Bolo would only offer clues!
user picture

Member for

7 years 6 months
Permalink

I'm scared of my first listen due to somewhat neg.responses. but Like some of you guys say "A little bit of something is better then all of nothing".. which is true for most things in life.
user picture

Member for

7 years 6 months
Permalink

Bobs slide riffs are different, but good in my opinion. Kind of Dukes of hazzardy. Mixing it up sometimes makes it unique. The first set sounds kind of muffled but evens out later on.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

While it's unfortunate that some of the reviews here suggest that this is not a pleasant listening experience for some. I cannot gauge my enjoyment based on that of others. Quite simply, I love this release, I love the sound, I love Phil' Sonic Base. For me there is something to like or love about almost any era of Grateful Dead. It's like watching your kids grow up, hit peak times and some valleys, always interesting, always moving forward. If I took a snapshot of just the released material to date including box sets I would need lead to believe that this band only existed from 1972 through 1978. Great music in these years for sure, but it only tells part of the story. One of my favorite things about this band and my nearly 40 year journey with them is the fact that the thing I loved about them on Monday is not the thing I love about them on Friday. In other words, I would get tired of listening to them if only one thing or a set of things appealed to me. The fact that there are layers and caves to explore with this music is what makes it endlessly fascinating. This release opens new doors and rekindles old memories of when I toured with them during this period and had, quite frankly, the time of my life. Thanks David for letting '83 loose!!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

Why oh why did they not at least patch in the whole final/3rd verse in Eyes during that brutal cut to the audience???? Daves Picks 27 is missing part of that 3rd verse that is on the bootleg/archive versions. I'm inclined to just listen to the archive version due to this. What a horrible decision! Like this release otherwise. Yeah, SQ cant compete with the Betty boards, 16 track Europe 72 remixes and especially the 89/90 24 track remixes, but it still sounds decent on a nice stereo. Drums go DEEP in the low end which surprised me. My subs came to life! Not patching in the entire 3rd verse to Eyes is inexcusable though. WTF???
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

Got mine today. Have not heard the entire show yet. But a couple of thoughts:While reading the booklet, I was surprised to read that this show has been in the vault for a while. I guess I just assumed they had a ton of recently returned stuff to put out. 20 years ago, I would only listen to shows up to '72. A snob you might say. Then I started checking out '73-'74 shows. Great stuff. Slightly more open minded. When 30 Trips came out, I decided to buy only the first 10 shows. Then '76 looked interesting, then, what the hell. '77. Accidentally over bid on '85. Kind of liked it. Finally, there were 5 shows I was never gonna buy....but I bought 'em anyway. I don't love all the shows, but each has it's charm, and value. Went back, bought all the DP's I passed on. All the Road Trips I passed on. Bought subs for all Dave's. Only missing 2 bonus discs from RT's. Have only ever passed on 4 box sets. What does it all mean?? I have learned to appreciate everything, without LOVING everything.I will Happily investigate ANY show, and find SOMETHING to like about it.I think this pick was for the folks who keep asking for'80's shows. That's nice of Dave to support these fans. I have no problem with it. Life is not fair. We don't get everything we want, every time. I can be happy with that. Maybe you should too. P.S. Everybody knows Tiny Tim invented Rock & Roll.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years
Permalink

...this show is hot! Well, as far as I've gotten at least, and that's through the first set. Will make my way through discs 2 and 3, tomorrow. Definitely "luvinit," so far, like sklnrzs put it, and by the way the rest of your post is well-said. Couldn't agree with you more. I'm finishing up Deal right now. Sonic Phil bombs away! Dave talks about the "magnificent" shows from June 1983 that unfortunately lack any usable recording. There's eight shows from that June- each one is blistering. On another note, what's Bobby singing in that back cover photo???
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

12 years 10 months
Permalink

Is screaming the "we are in our own" verse from Throwing Stones
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....and I double dog dare you doubters on that opinion. You know it to be true (Obi-Wan hand sweep motion). Jerry's chasing Jerry throughout. Can't catch me! I'm the gingerbread fuckin' man! Even my wife asked me. "Are there two Jerry's on stage?" Golden.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

6 years 3 months
Permalink

I can't say enough good things about this release. I love the energy here, the the performance and the tempo. I get what other's are saying about the quality however this was a big problem for all shows recorded in this era. I'm so glad to have a release from this era. Love the fast tempo the band plays here.My Favorites are the Wang Dang opener and Jack Straw in set I, Set II I love the Eyes>Jam Drums>Space>Throwing Stones. Hot Show!!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

12 years 9 months
Permalink

Best yet, imo! sparkling gems everywhere. I can hear Bobby!! Thank you!
user picture

Member for

16 years 1 month
Permalink

I have made an appointment with the audiology dept to have my hearing checked. If anyone really thinks this sounds good, which some have stated here, then I must need a check-up. I am listening to this through a audiophile stereo with Altec Lansing speakers. Cut my teeth on early 80's shows and....well, this is just not how I remember them sounding. The entire band must have consumed an oz of coke that night, which doesn't go well with the doses that anyone in the audience partook of. Wait, was there doses in Boise back then? ;) Back on the shelf this will go to collect dust.
user picture

Member for

16 years
Permalink

Your ears are fine this doesn't sound that good. After some equalizing mostly lowering the middle around 400hz to 600hz and around 2000khz and increasing a little on the ends it's not too bad. The only Dead I have official or not that doesn't need at least some equalizing is (you guessed it) Spring 90 The Other One.
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

the sound on this does have spots of "wha'?" the performance itself is fine. I like really good sound, but I have never been a major audiophile. I enjoy this show. more 83, Dave. really too bad that 6/18/83 and 6/20/83 and 6/22/83 are either not in the vault or are deemed not releasable. 5/13 5/15 10/11 10/15 10/31 "mowr, mowr, mowr", Dave.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Well said. Great post.Totally respect folks personal favs and would never disagree that some eras are more consistent then others, but the Dead gave us thirty wonderful years of music, not six, and what you dig at any given time does not have to be static.... “Some times you feel like a nut, sometimes you don’t”
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Great Post, love the philosophy. Just because everything can’t be a favorite, doesn’t mean it’s not good or have some value.....
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 6 months
Permalink

We recently moved so things have been a little crazy lately. My wife laughed when literally the first piece of mail we received at our new place was Dap 27. However, I didn't get a chance to listen to it until today. Even before I put it on, I was in a mood for an 83 show. Sirius was playing a chunk of 10/21/83 when I was in the car earlier today so I was already in the right mindset. I have heard others say there are sound issues, but it sounds just fine to me. It sounds like an 80s show which is not an insult in any way. It's not flawless, but neither were the 80s, especially 83. It captures the era and overall I'm really happy with it. I obviously like 80's shows in general so I'm biased, but this is a really fun show. The boys are obviously into it and having a great time. I'm happy to have this one in my collection and I have a feeling I'll be spending the rest of the week going down the 83 rabbit hole. thanks Dave and co!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years
Permalink

I saw 20 shows in 1983 and for sure had a great time. But listening to this one again gives me pause. Jerry's voice is shot, they race through most of the songs (Jack Straw, Deal, Help on the Way) and the Help on the Way is cringeworthy. He can't remember the words, he can't play the leads, they cannot get it together. Hey, we have a whole decade of amazing stuff (68-78) so it's not like there's nowhere to turn. But I'm baffled that the masses are clamoring for more 80s stuff, or raving about this show, neither the sound quality nor the musicianship is notable. Back to '72 indeed!
user picture

Member for

10 years 4 months
Permalink

#10297 finally landed last night. There have been some pretty good links already, but If you need a higher-res, color-corrected version of Tim McDonagh's cover art, here are my scans:https://www.dropbox.com/sh/lz8295bje2dpsxf/AAA2cik9bkrnlJ8kxsNPA1iQa?dl… There’s a “Rectangular” version (just like the CD cover) plus a “Square” version for anybody so inclined You can also find my scans for all Dave’s Picks and Bonus covers at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qx5j9ydoc7bzm8z/AAD8yK_vCv_kQ-oLkLJQVCEla?dl… Pass ‘em around, and keep the music playing.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

15 years 6 months
Permalink

The performance is uneven, as mentioned in many posts some tunes are raced through. But mid 80s shows were always more about being there than the quality of their playing. You went because the scene was still too much fun to miss. I can accept the performance because it is mid-80s. But the sound? Not sure how this show can be touted for its sound quality. The mix is poor, Brent's keyboard is in your face, Jerry sounds like he's playing in a back room a good 50 yards behind the stage and Bobby is some where between them, but still far back. Drums? From the recording I'm guessing Billy and Micky had the night off. Just a terrible recording. This will most likely be the first and last time I listen to this show. Dave if this is the best of what's left of the mid-80s then leave the rest where they are.
product sku
081227931599