• 1,815 replies
    heatherlew
    Default Avatar
    Joined:

    "The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

    And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

    Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

    *Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Well Said
    Right on VGuy. It is what it is.. and it's good.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope.....
    ....with a Makisupa thrown in just to keep it interesting. Rewatching it now. Kush.And why does one ponder on Rhinos and Dave's decisions? I will keep subscribing until the end. Stop worrying about what other people think. That's a problem with society today. Whether it be music or anything else. Grow a pair and either crank it or shelve it and stop worrying about everyone else. My son is hooked on reaction videos. Trying to break that chain. To let some random soul decide or sway what you think of something is dangerous. Think for yourself. That's a concept that is disappearing in this day and age. I've seen the future, and it's leaning towards one not being a one, but sliding into a hivemind. There was a Black Mirror episode that nailed it. If your not a five star, your trash. Wait for it.
  • dreading
    Joined:
    Kayak Guy
    I was enjoying your post until I got to this part: you wrote "to say this music is unworthy of release is wrong. the whole idea of Dave's Picks is to take whats left from the vault and put out the whole shows in the best quality possible and people that subscribe should understand this" According to Dave, Dave's Picks is for the best in quality shows from an audio and performance stand point. Many do not feel this standard was met, nor did they for DaP 20. Boise doesn't pass the litmus test from either angle from way more people than usual for a release. DaP 8 didn't have a backlash like this. THAT'S a great show that sounds great. Boise is worthy of release for a DL series or standalone, but certainly not a DaP release, based on Dave and Rhino's mission statement of audio quality and performance quality FIRST. So why did they do it? I think Dave and Rhino know that they wouldn't sell as many units as a standalone show outside the Dave's Picks series (or they felt they could possibly lose money). By releasing it as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, they satisfy a contingency of subscribers who have been complaining over the lack of early 80s. And there is little to no risk for Rhino to put it out there as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, since the subscriptions are already paid for. The risk element will change if they go with 80s/90s for DaP 28/29 and the shows aren't DaP 8 quality grand slams. But as is, I think it's relatively low risk, even with the large number of complaints about audio and performance issues. If DaP 28 is 80s/90s and the announcement for 2019 subscriptions features 80s/90s, I imagine a drop off in subscriptions would result. But I don't think that will happen, they're not there yet. I believe Dave and Rhino know they were in a tough spot with the early 80s. They could potentially lose the support of some subscribers by continuing to ignore this period, or they could roll the dice with a show that isn't up to the standard of audio and performance quality that Dave's Picks has been so far, and reach for a happy medium. I think that's what they did and that's what they achieved (not because they didn't want to release a grand slam from 1983, but because, as we've been hearing over and over, there simply aren't good tapes available from this period). This show is a win for them in the short term. If they return to "business as usual" with the 60s and 70s, they will keep their 18K subscribers, and probably continue to increase the yearly subscription numbers. If they go 80s / 90s for 28 & 29, subscription sales will probably drop off, as the comments here clearly demonstrate there are large numbers of people who do not think this show passes the litmus test for audio and performance quality (I believe the releases will still sell out, just not as quickly, as most of the 18K goes to subscribers). While it's great that a lot of people liked this release, it's irrelevant in the face of the negative feedback. ENOUGH people wrote in to say it doesn't pass the litmus test. "Enough" does not have to be a majority, merely a quorum. How do we know this? Because the dissenters for this release are out in record numbers (as well as for DaP 20, after which it took two years for another 80s show to be released). And people do have a right to say this show is unworthy of release for a Dave's Picks. There's no getting around the mission statement Dave and Rhino made and often repeat, indicating the best audio and performance quality shows would be the Dave's Picks standard. They came up short here, and the people have spoken. There are clearly other shows that could have been released in its stead, just maybe not from '83. One of the RFK shows from '89 would have met the Dave's standard, but it's a multi-track, they sound tight, and there is greater profit to be made putting that one out as an individual release. That being said, I think I would have done the same thing Rhino did here, given the point in the road they find themselves (they can't ignore the early 80s forever without losing some subscribers). The real problem here is that they also said they would represent all eras, but they (apparentky) do not truly have the tapes to do so. My points are simply: 1) yes people DO have a right to say Boise '83 is unworthy of release as a Dave's Picks, because the mission statement was not met. Sure, one could try to argue that sound and performance quality are subjective, but too many people already agree this show came up short, so the polls are in and the numbers are significant. Further, there is NO Caveat Emptor on Dave's Picks. Dave has been saying since day one (and repeating often) that only the best sounding shows are slated for this series. If they start to put the Caveat Emptor you quoted from Dick's Picks on the Dave's Picks CDs and subscription advertisements, THEN we can expect something like Boise. You seemed a little bothered that people dinged this release for audio issues, but words were spoken, deals were made, and now there's a letdown. There ARE better sounding shows available, just maybe not from '83. It is you who should understand this point, not the other way around, where you imply that subscribers should have an awareness that sub-STANDARD audio is part of the deal. No. Standard is the operative word here, this release is unusually poor, and the complaints are coming in droves. 2) releasing something from this year was still the right choice for Rhino. As I said, the game for them is to continue to grow the subscriber base, and while DaP 27 is an encroachment on the mission statement, there are a significant number of subscribers who wanted it, and Rhino has now satisfied that contingency (for the time being). Strategy: give them their fill now, while there is still plenty of top shelf 70s on tap and arriving on doorsteps within a month's time. 3) point number 2 is only a good move for them if they get back to the 60s and 70s for DaP 28 and 29. There are still plenty of shows left to do so. Continuing with the 80s and 90s would be a mistake, if the goal is to keep their 18K and growing subscribers. 4) I think the real story here, is that the reality is just like Dave has been telling us for a long time now. There aren't too many shows from this. To choose from. I'm not expecting any Grand Slams from 1983 anytime soon. Dave clearly has some familiarity with this show, and I think he probably felt it was the best available. As a collective unit we asked for it and we got it.
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Big Box
    I like the big box.. but comparing it to FW69 or E72 is like comparing apple juice to hard cider. There is good stuff to be found in the big box. Continuing with your thread earlier today, I think at this point we know pretty much what's left in the vault to be released. I think their strategy is to wow us when necessary and at other times keep their power dry so they can live and fight for another day. So a mix with some greatness sprinkled in. Interesting.. they played 2/26/77, Swing Auditorium Santa Barbara today on Sirius today. Always the pleaser and a grade A show. There are so many A++ shows we now know exist in the vault. I think we know they are going to highlight them yet mix them in gingerly over time mixed with other, lesser known shows. I think that's how it's going to be. The Boxzilla model until they run out of releasable tapes in ~20 years? Frankly.. I'm ok with that, there is plenty of stellar stuff now left in the vault. My personal favorite release ever is the steamer trunk, but I still revisit the big box on occasion with enthusiasm. There is prime stuff in there. As for Cape Cod, it was a good show for '79.. but perhaps not the best of the year.
  • alvarhanso
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope
    Was pleasantly surprised by the Phish show the other night, this Runaway Antelope (with a stop from Makisupa Policeman) was vintage Phish, and mashed up 3 of their oldest songs, Runaway Jim, Run Like an Antelope, and Makisupa Policeman in an unplanned event. The looks on their faces as they go through it is priceless. I thought it was pre-planned from my spot on the lawn, but clearly they surprised themselves. It wasn't the best I've seen them, but it was very, very good. Hope those that watched the webcast here enjoyed it, sounds like Vguy did, and someone else who caught the bulk of the best stuff. First set was good, nothing outstanding. Second set was outstanding, and the encore was a good indicator they had fun. It was a bummer that they ended at 10:45 and clearly had another 15 minutes, but it was a great time with some old friends and some family having their first shows, including my buddy's 9 year old and his father in his 60s. Both had the time of their lives. Nearly 35 years ago, the people of Boise left feeling the same way. Music is a magical thing, and a really good band can make your problems dissolve away for 2-4 hours at a time, and also unite you with like minded people (who can still reasonably agree to disagree about nearly everything). The torch was lit long ago, but it still burns in towns across America and the world where these musical caravans trek seasonally. The music and spirit of the Dead live on. Speaking of which, it is now 26 days from September 7, and that means a treasure chest is being filled and readied for delivery soon. Wondrous surprises await! PS: Dave's Picks 6 has 2 excellent Dark Stars that are fantastic post-show traveling material. Also, We Bid You Goodnight takes on a very ominous feel in a driving thunderstorm with 60+ mph wind gusts.
  • Angry Jack Straw
    Joined:
    Led
    I would rather talk food than this release anyday. Just visited Leunig's Bistro. And old staple located in Burlington. Grabbed a plate of duck confit french fries and gravy with the wife, while the kids relished the truffle fries. Twice fried potatoes, silky gravy and fall apart mallard. Accompanied by a preserved lemon, basil and vodka lemonade. Right around the corner from Nectars, famous for their late night gravy fries and regularly hosting a band. Both highly overrated. Adirondacks and Lake Champlain to the fore, Green mountains to the aft. Good living. An East cosat version of Pearl Street in Boulder. Funny you mentioned the Cape Cod show. That was my first listen from TTATS. It got so much hype, I had to hear it. I found it kinda, meh, as well. I suspect the hype was nothing more than the band played Cape Cod. Not a bad show, just not outstanding. Enjoy your journey through the box. But at the end of the day, I think you will find yourself reaching for E72 more often than not after the initial few listens. Oh yeah. The Red Sox are rolling. Love it when yankee fan gets apoplectic.
  • Terrapin Moon
    Joined:
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad.
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad. If you want something bad: 10/30/83. weir is virtually non existent jerry will keep coming in and out. will not listen to this one again not worth the time. I cant even comment on playing cuz of it. I don't really feel like the playing is mediocre but due to the problems that plague this tape through out I can't ascertain that. Phish 2/13/87 would probly be more worthwhile than this one. I played it thinking hey maybe the mix would get better but then it got to the end of set I with Might As Well I was already in too deep and may as well be finished. it turned out to be a big lemon.
  • Deadicated
    Joined:
    Bear's Sonic Journals
    Should you be on the fence about the ABB, Fillmore East, February 1970 update, every pain has been taken to present it with the utmost quality. Jeffrey Norman, along with Plangent Processes, have made this an awesome release. Great liners and art work, too. Anything to add Hendrixfreak?
  • LedDed
    Joined:
    Paddy Melt
    I just had a paddy melt at a Red Sox/Patriots bar called, "The Elm," on Colfax Ave. in Denver. Colfax itself is worthy of a thesis. It went like this: I subbed out the onions for bacon, and the paddy was hand-formed and a true medium with a thin band of red in the middle. Marbled rye, swiss, and thousand island made this a delight along with a healthy, salted helping of freshly-cut pub chips. All washed down with Tito's and soda. Front row on 4/12/83 might be when you did die, Oro. Who knows if this is real or all a dream. Kayak nice stream of consciousness. You people are so much more entertaining, sincere and informative than the nightly news. I'll bet this room could solve most of the world's problems. But, no, wait... that was already done in the 1960s and nothing changed it's only gotten worse. Forget I mentioned it. I'm currently digesting that paddy by way of Cape Cod Coliseum, South Yarmouth, MA. October 27, 1979 on what was my then-eleventh birthday. Too bad I missed it. I've listened to at least one song and in good years, several from every 30 trips disc I've burned into iTunes over the last two days. This show is nothing remarkable, just Good 'Ol Grateful Dead. Which I suppose is remarkable in and of itself. I don't have enough wall space for all the posters and wall art that lies unframed in roll-up tubes as it is. I suppose I could add more. The Fillmore has an amazing collection of framed trippy posters of all the bands that have played there. Love that shit.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    My wife yelled at me....
    ....for apparently treating her like a child. So I gave her a sticker for standing up for herself.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years 1 month

"The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

*Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....it was just shit. Drop the crazy. I like my happy place just fine. And yes alvarhanso. Stop motion is a dying art. I latch onto every one I can find. Meticulous and wonderous.
user picture

Member for

10 years 10 months
Permalink

Similar setlists for sure, and I'm not so fond of 22, but 26 is a completely different animal. Much better main show and bonus. The two Other Ones are massively different (hell, the two halves of Other Ones on 11/17/71 are incredibly different from each other with that fantastic Me & My Uncle jam in the second half and Feelin' Groovy in the first, along with at least 3 other distinct jams). Also, some of us didn't like the shows chosen for 22, as 12/4 & 5 are almost universally more highly regarded, and both circulate in good FM SBDs, which is probably why they chose the lesser knowns. 26 is a great offering in giving an opportunity to directly compare the sound of the band with just Keith, then adding Pigpen, kind of like Dave's 6 with Pigpen and Pigpen and TC. I'm avoiding wading back into the sound/performance debate on this Pick again, I've made my points on that, and I'm happy for those who are ecstatic with this release. It won't get many listens for me probably, but I'm okay with that, I have 26 other Dave's, 36 Dick's, and a bunch of box sets, and other officially released shows, so I'm perfectly fine with it just sitting there making the collection pretty. ETA: Vguy did you see Fantastic Mr Fox as well? I'm a sucker for Wes Anderson, and Isle of Dogs didn't disappoint for me at all. Also, the Bob, Brent, Billy, Mickey Jam leading into Drums and the Space afterward are high points on this release.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....Wes Anderson is my spirit animal. Coraline is another treasure. It's not Anderson, but it's a high water mark.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....me too. Tonight I'm spinning RT 4.5. Lounge Dead to some. To me it's just the GOGD."Sleepy fire in your eyes. Is that desire in disguise?" Coitus anyone? I've had girlfriends and a current wife who pull that string. Shazam!! ....edit. The Dancin' is worth ones attention. Pull out your Boston Road Trips, check your disco at the door, and crank that shit!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....that the RT 4.5 release features a Franklin's encore? G'night.looks like jrf snagged that awesome days between artwork. I love it. Can I get it on a flag?
user picture

Member for

11 years 3 months
Permalink

I got it from an e-mail from dead.net that came in today. Check your e-mail.:o)
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....I got it in my email. I asked if I could get it on a flag. I would buy it.
user picture

Member for

11 years 3 months
Permalink

oops...
user picture

Member for

7 years 8 months
Permalink

Just a reminder that as of this morning, August 2nd, a certain huge sales website that starts with the letter A and rhymes with Jam-a-thon still has new copies of Dave's Picks 20, 22, 24, and 25 available in limited quantities for their original price. If you missed any of these on their respective release dates, you can get a surplus copy while they last.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years
Permalink

I’m with you on this, alvarhanso, I love 26 and think it’s a really awesome set- with the jams of course and the Keith, Pig Pen variation. But looking at the two together leaves me scratching my head. That said, I’m definitely not in the ecstatic about this release lot. 83/84 is/was long due, but there are better ones, to be sure. As I mentioned before, that June 83 run is a beast- but Dave mentioned (even in the liner notes) the problem with those. I am, however, happy with this one. Where does 28 go from here? Hmm.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 7 months
Permalink

Anyone go last night? how was it? what was the box set reveal like?
user picture

Member for

13 years 3 months
Permalink

I had a really good time last night. I know this show is available on DVD but its a great show and its fun watching it on the big screen with good sound. All my friends are lame so I went by myself this year...but I still felt right at home in many ways. Everyone was all smiles and some young ladies were dancing in the aisles and everyone cheering and applauding after each song. Not a bad way to spend a Wednesday night.
user picture

Member for

14 years 10 months
Permalink

at my theater, there was no box reveal. there was a trivia loop prior to the show (e.g., "who was the only female member of the GD?"), but nothing else.
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

I grabbed 20, 22. Crazy what the older ones are going for... Surplus copy?
user picture

Member for

7 years 8 months
Permalink

I am perhaps speculating when I use the phrase "surplus copy." My assumption is that batches of extra CDs above and beyond the limited release number are produced for each Dave's Picks for replacements/shipping losses/defects and that these are now being sold to clean house. #14 sold out after a day or two and #22 looks to sell out today. I suspect the remaining 3 (20, 24, 25) are going to be gone sooner rather than later. Again, just educated guesses.
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

Interesting, I missed out on 14. I will have to keep my eyes out..
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

...even after several times through. Assholes want to take their digs at me for expressing my enjoyment....that's their problem and I could care less.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Did all of you posting about this release the past few days pay for express shipping or something? I didn't get mine yet :-( Waited and watched for mailman like I was expecting Mailorder tickets back in the day LOL... but no... just bills and solicitations. Bummer... iG
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Did all of you posting about this release the past few days pay for express shipping or something? I didn't get mine yet :-( Waited and watched for mailman like I was expecting Mailorder tickets back in the day LOL... but no... just bills and solicitations. Bummer... iG
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 6 months
Permalink

To answer your question I did regular delivery. My email said the 31st but it got here on the 30th. I'm in the SF Bay area
user picture

Member for

14 years 10 months
Permalink

with all due respect to Bobby...lol... I was afraid of a wardrobe malfunction moment watching 7/7/89 last night.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

16 years 6 months
Permalink

My appreciation actually went up the 2nd listening
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years 3 months
Permalink

So now that I've had a chance to do a couple more listen throughs of DP 27 I'm liking it more and more. Yes, the vocals are overriding the instruments more than I'd like. I do like the quicker tempo on some of the tunes. This is a time capsule of the only concert the Dead ever played in Idaho. It's from the soundboard master and back in those days low generation copies of it on the tape trader circuit would have been coveted. So this was mastered on cassette and not reel-to reel. A CD made from a soundboard cassette is better than one than one that can't be made because the Betty Board has been lost in an attic somewhere. Keep 'em coming Dave and thanks Jeffrey for your great work on these.
user picture

Member for

14 years 7 months
Permalink

Wow, this sounds better than I thought it would! Seriously, this is a fine sounding release, believe me, I have heard ALOT worse than this! Dave L. and Co. need to mine the '80's and '60's more, because this sounds perfect to these ears. Anyway, I heard that there are "recording patches", does anyone have the start-stop times of the sound patches? It is not listed on the release as there being any "patches". Again, this a real fine release and the GD camp should not be so worried about the recordings because this is just fine. Oh yeah, the music - the band is cooking and playing with fire. More please!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years 5 months
Permalink

Admittedly haven't listened yet because I am away - but I expect to fully, fully enjoy the release when I'm back - whatever "warts" and all. With almost all of the Dick's Picks, Dave'Picks, box sets, Vault releases, Download Series, etc, I think I have roughly 22 to 25 days of Dead music I could play straight without repeating a track. What I appreciate most is the VARIETY! Sure 68-69, 72-74, 77 or a few select years, may be THE best or THE best recorded, but it would be BORING to just have that. What keeps me buying is variety. And releasing 80's shows and 90's shows, and any earlier releases 65-70, represents variety. Rarely do I have the time to listen to full shows all the way through anyways, so even if a show is pretty average at parts, but has a particularly great "section", at this point that is enough for me to buy it. Example, the recent 11/06/77 release. Given that 11/04 and 11/05 was already released as well as many other shows from 77 that are IMO more enjoyable overall than 11/06/77, I can question it's release. That being said, I still love having it - and actually for the tracks that are most unliked by others - I LOVE the Scarlet / Fire transition. With Garcia's guitar dropping out for alot of it, is it an all time great version like 05/08/77 or 07/07/89? NO. But I actually love hearing the mellow groove the other band members create without him - it is a UNIQUE transition and a unique Scarlet / Fire for that reason - and once in awhile that unique mellowness is exactly what I am in the mood for. And for this 09/02/83 - the what I hear are unique post-Eyes Jam, unique type of Space, Wang Dang Doodle > Jack Straw, and some of the other highlights make it worthy of release at this point. Also Phil's intro to the crowd - Beware citizens!! It are those small tidbits unique to every show that makes me want to buy them all. So release them all from any era I say!! For DaP 28 - hoping against hope for some uncovered '70.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

11 years 6 months
Permalink

Man I'm cool with this release. It has it's warts but overall some folks need another listen. I'm happy. Last 5 BB-Ill Communication 4-3-98 Island Tour Phish 7-11-03 PJ 4-26-03 PJ DaP 1 Extra Ween Chocolate and Cheese
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years 5 months
Permalink

Another example is the 05/26/93 Road Trips. When that first came out I was like why? And I basically shelved it after some listens to set 1. Only very recently did I pull it out for the sake of some variety and finally really clued into listening to the Playing in the Band. I did a double take. Is this still the ‘93 show I had put on Or had I skipped way backwards to another era? Ah that’s why this one was worthy. Super glad to have it.....now. All these years later. If we trust Dave, each Pick has something to offer.....of course some more than others. But all worth some listens from time to time. The ‘86 TTATS - equal to ‘73-74 - no way. But fun to listen to less often. Absolutely.
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

Confirms that this SBD recording still sounds way better than the AUD recording. Preconceived notions. If you despise Brent and the 80’s and expect (want) this to sound like crap, it will sound like crap. If you love Brent and the 80’s and expect (want) this to sound awesome, it will sound awesome. As I posted before, this sounds so much better than the hissy, muddy cassettes I used to have. Happy for this release and the ability to add to a less represented part of the 30-year collection. Thanks Dave and crew! My only complaint, and this is the same complaint as many releases, is the overlap transition between CD’s 2 and 3. Why does this keep happening? These aren’t cassette tapes. DAVE!, if you read the posts here you would be aware that many people load these onto music players/iTunes/etc. Overlap transitions sound completely stupid!!!!! Please STOP! If it’s Jeffrey doing it, tell him to stop. I actually go through the extra step of splicing out the overlap and burning CD-R copies. But a lot of people don’t, and just have to suffer through it. Charlie Miller makes his shows ‘seamless transitions’. Why can’t Dave and Jeffrey? Seriously, it takes more work to make an overlap transition than to just leave the recording the way it is on the master.
user picture

Member for

7 years 1 month
Permalink

I didn't see any digs at you space brother. Are they PMing you? No need to start with profanity and name calling. Good vibes about. Streicher is that 25 days include drums and Rhythm devils?
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

So I have finally been able to give DaP 27 a good listen. I haveread most of the reviews of this release and honestly I fall in the middle of the road. As far as sound quality goes I agree it has its issues. At times it sounds like the vocals are loud or the keys are up too high in the mix. There are a few audience patches. The one during Eyes is pretty bad. Yet these issues weren't to my ears, persistent on every song. There are periods of balance with sone songs, at least as much as could be achieved given the source. Performance-wise, I have to agree with the theory that the boys were delving into high-octane party favors. I do think for some songs it paid off. Big Rail Road, Deal and GDTRFB were pretty good. Help > Slip > Frank was nice too even with the vocal nonsense during Help. The Jam before drums and the Space after it were very unique- I like both a lot. Converseley Throwing Stones went off of the deep end in a bad way. Like someone else said it almost sounds like Jerry soloed too a completely different song. Although it kind of worked in a way too, so I am not quite sure on that. Overall I like this show, it is inconsistent but when songs and some jams get going it is a lot of fun. I like many others, admittedly have gaps in my listening and 1983 is one of them. So I too went and listened to Dicks Picks 6 10/14/83 for a comparison. Although I may think that 10/14 show is better I still like this current DaP 27 as well. More importantly with Dave's Picks, Road Trips and Dicks Picks, along with box sets and one off releases, there has been a large amount of the "big" shows released. When I think of big shows I usually think of the great and widely available, usually SBD source shows from the tape trading days. So of course I think of 3/2/69, 4/28/71, 8/27/72, 5/8/77, 7/8/78, 9/18/87, 9/10/91, etc... I mean I had all of these on tapes and they have been officially released, most in their entirety. Yet there have been some releases that I certainly do not hate, but just do not do it for me. DaP 20, the Boulder 81 show is one. I don't feel that the show is terrible, but it just doesn't really seem to get going. Another that someone just mentioned is DaP 25 11/6/77. I dont think that the show is bad and it has some great jams, but the proceeding 3 shows are better overall to me. My point of all of this is that when a show that is not in the "big" category or even some that are, gets released I think there is a greater hit or miss factor, even when not considering sound quality. Yet despite this I think it is worth a chance every now and again for Dave and Co. to produce a release that might just be a sleeper. Whether the show wasn't all in the vault or if it is Betty Board upgrade, I think we need to get the under the radar shows. I always think if the Road Trips from 4/6/82. I had never heard that show until I purchased it from Real Gone Music. I really like that show and I have been repeatedly surprised by the playing on that one. I dont know what else to say other than Thank You, Dave L. and crew! Please keep these shows coming. Oh and yeah I want 10/18/72, 2/15/73, or 12/1/79 next please.
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

This isn’t the first time that ‘sold out’ shows reappeared. Happened with several Eur72 shows. Also, I previously received a replacement DaP due to defective discs and it was a numbered copy even though it had ‘sold out’. And, recently there was an eBay seller with unnumbered DaPs that were surplus promo copies. The number on the cardboard holder is arbitrary. It’s not the production number of the CD, it’s the order that the cardboard holder went through the printer.
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

Anyone else notice that printed on the plastic wrap in light blue ink right below the bar code it said ‘Disc Made in Mexico’?Seems that production is back up and running. Hopefully they resolved their QC issues.
user picture

Member for

6 years 10 months
Permalink

The audio of this show is just awful. Is this your first non-cassette release? Tell me, on a scale of 1 -10 where does something like Cornell 77 rank. And then how about this Boise show?
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

If you recall, and if you don’t go back to the original page for the posts, many people hate the excessive reverb added to 5-8-77. A lot of people were actually pissed off at the sound quality of that release.It’s very unrealistic. Remember that Betty had a separate feed and adjusted the signal before recording. Betty was not in the arena, but was in a make shift studio, whether it be backstage or downstairs.
user picture

Member for

6 years 10 months
Permalink

Take Veneta or any of the Europe 72s or whatever you consider an excellent recording, assign a number to it from 1-10 and then assign a relative number to DaP 27. (But really this exercise was for dilbert)
user picture

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

After giving this a couple of listens I can say that I'm glad to have it. The sound is not as good as some of the other official releases but it didn't bother me too much to enjoy the show. If I want to listen to perfectly recorded music I can spin some Steely Dan or some other impeccably recorded studio masterpieces. When I listen to live dead recorded decades ago I accept that the recording quality is not going to be perfect. This show is a snapshot of the band at a time when the impact of some lifestyle choices were probably starting to catch up to various members of the band and they sound different than in earlier years. But I like '80s dead, that was when I saw most of my shows and when I first acquired some often sketchy sounding early '80's live recordings on cassette ( and was glad to get them). This release sounds better than all of my cassettes (except my cassette of 8/13/75 which was pristine and included an extended intro by Bill Graham not included on the official release). The point being that while the sound quality is clearly not perfect, it is not so bad as to limit my enjoyment of the show. I don't think that I would like the dead so much if it weren't for diversity in sound over the years, and I am glad to get a listen to as much as possible. So far, I have been happy with Dave's choices for these releases, and I am guessing the trend will continue.
user picture

Member for

6 years 10 months
Permalink

Believe me I know which ones have overdubs in them. If it's not on the original Europe 72 it's not overdubbed. and there are 22 shows. Why don't you just answer the question instead of avoid it? Take Crimson white and Indigo then. Or is there no stellar live recording to compare Dave's Picks 27 to? That is so funny that you completely ignored the question and tried to make it sound like 22 shows are completely overdubbed. Take 25 songs that aren't and answer the question. Do you even understand the question? Are you that stupid? Why don't you just tell us Venetta is a crappy recording because it was hot that day and the instruments are out of tune. Maybe you keep your big nose out of business that's not yours.
user picture

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

...I will admit that I am way beyond psyched for the '73 '74 PNW box set as I am particularly fond of the way the dead sounded in 1973. Jerry also, if there is something released from '73 I am on it.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....not trying to be pretentious or anything. I just can't stop listening to them. Winterland 12.29.77 is in full force. aka DP 10....
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....that 12.29.77 has a Terrapin, JBG encore? Good stuff.
product sku
081227931599