• 1,815 replies
    heatherlew
    Default Avatar
    Joined:

    "The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

    And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

    Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

    *Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Well Said
    Right on VGuy. It is what it is.. and it's good.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope.....
    ....with a Makisupa thrown in just to keep it interesting. Rewatching it now. Kush.And why does one ponder on Rhinos and Dave's decisions? I will keep subscribing until the end. Stop worrying about what other people think. That's a problem with society today. Whether it be music or anything else. Grow a pair and either crank it or shelve it and stop worrying about everyone else. My son is hooked on reaction videos. Trying to break that chain. To let some random soul decide or sway what you think of something is dangerous. Think for yourself. That's a concept that is disappearing in this day and age. I've seen the future, and it's leaning towards one not being a one, but sliding into a hivemind. There was a Black Mirror episode that nailed it. If your not a five star, your trash. Wait for it.
  • dreading
    Joined:
    Kayak Guy
    I was enjoying your post until I got to this part: you wrote "to say this music is unworthy of release is wrong. the whole idea of Dave's Picks is to take whats left from the vault and put out the whole shows in the best quality possible and people that subscribe should understand this" According to Dave, Dave's Picks is for the best in quality shows from an audio and performance stand point. Many do not feel this standard was met, nor did they for DaP 20. Boise doesn't pass the litmus test from either angle from way more people than usual for a release. DaP 8 didn't have a backlash like this. THAT'S a great show that sounds great. Boise is worthy of release for a DL series or standalone, but certainly not a DaP release, based on Dave and Rhino's mission statement of audio quality and performance quality FIRST. So why did they do it? I think Dave and Rhino know that they wouldn't sell as many units as a standalone show outside the Dave's Picks series (or they felt they could possibly lose money). By releasing it as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, they satisfy a contingency of subscribers who have been complaining over the lack of early 80s. And there is little to no risk for Rhino to put it out there as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, since the subscriptions are already paid for. The risk element will change if they go with 80s/90s for DaP 28/29 and the shows aren't DaP 8 quality grand slams. But as is, I think it's relatively low risk, even with the large number of complaints about audio and performance issues. If DaP 28 is 80s/90s and the announcement for 2019 subscriptions features 80s/90s, I imagine a drop off in subscriptions would result. But I don't think that will happen, they're not there yet. I believe Dave and Rhino know they were in a tough spot with the early 80s. They could potentially lose the support of some subscribers by continuing to ignore this period, or they could roll the dice with a show that isn't up to the standard of audio and performance quality that Dave's Picks has been so far, and reach for a happy medium. I think that's what they did and that's what they achieved (not because they didn't want to release a grand slam from 1983, but because, as we've been hearing over and over, there simply aren't good tapes available from this period). This show is a win for them in the short term. If they return to "business as usual" with the 60s and 70s, they will keep their 18K subscribers, and probably continue to increase the yearly subscription numbers. If they go 80s / 90s for 28 & 29, subscription sales will probably drop off, as the comments here clearly demonstrate there are large numbers of people who do not think this show passes the litmus test for audio and performance quality (I believe the releases will still sell out, just not as quickly, as most of the 18K goes to subscribers). While it's great that a lot of people liked this release, it's irrelevant in the face of the negative feedback. ENOUGH people wrote in to say it doesn't pass the litmus test. "Enough" does not have to be a majority, merely a quorum. How do we know this? Because the dissenters for this release are out in record numbers (as well as for DaP 20, after which it took two years for another 80s show to be released). And people do have a right to say this show is unworthy of release for a Dave's Picks. There's no getting around the mission statement Dave and Rhino made and often repeat, indicating the best audio and performance quality shows would be the Dave's Picks standard. They came up short here, and the people have spoken. There are clearly other shows that could have been released in its stead, just maybe not from '83. One of the RFK shows from '89 would have met the Dave's standard, but it's a multi-track, they sound tight, and there is greater profit to be made putting that one out as an individual release. That being said, I think I would have done the same thing Rhino did here, given the point in the road they find themselves (they can't ignore the early 80s forever without losing some subscribers). The real problem here is that they also said they would represent all eras, but they (apparentky) do not truly have the tapes to do so. My points are simply: 1) yes people DO have a right to say Boise '83 is unworthy of release as a Dave's Picks, because the mission statement was not met. Sure, one could try to argue that sound and performance quality are subjective, but too many people already agree this show came up short, so the polls are in and the numbers are significant. Further, there is NO Caveat Emptor on Dave's Picks. Dave has been saying since day one (and repeating often) that only the best sounding shows are slated for this series. If they start to put the Caveat Emptor you quoted from Dick's Picks on the Dave's Picks CDs and subscription advertisements, THEN we can expect something like Boise. You seemed a little bothered that people dinged this release for audio issues, but words were spoken, deals were made, and now there's a letdown. There ARE better sounding shows available, just maybe not from '83. It is you who should understand this point, not the other way around, where you imply that subscribers should have an awareness that sub-STANDARD audio is part of the deal. No. Standard is the operative word here, this release is unusually poor, and the complaints are coming in droves. 2) releasing something from this year was still the right choice for Rhino. As I said, the game for them is to continue to grow the subscriber base, and while DaP 27 is an encroachment on the mission statement, there are a significant number of subscribers who wanted it, and Rhino has now satisfied that contingency (for the time being). Strategy: give them their fill now, while there is still plenty of top shelf 70s on tap and arriving on doorsteps within a month's time. 3) point number 2 is only a good move for them if they get back to the 60s and 70s for DaP 28 and 29. There are still plenty of shows left to do so. Continuing with the 80s and 90s would be a mistake, if the goal is to keep their 18K and growing subscribers. 4) I think the real story here, is that the reality is just like Dave has been telling us for a long time now. There aren't too many shows from this. To choose from. I'm not expecting any Grand Slams from 1983 anytime soon. Dave clearly has some familiarity with this show, and I think he probably felt it was the best available. As a collective unit we asked for it and we got it.
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Big Box
    I like the big box.. but comparing it to FW69 or E72 is like comparing apple juice to hard cider. There is good stuff to be found in the big box. Continuing with your thread earlier today, I think at this point we know pretty much what's left in the vault to be released. I think their strategy is to wow us when necessary and at other times keep their power dry so they can live and fight for another day. So a mix with some greatness sprinkled in. Interesting.. they played 2/26/77, Swing Auditorium Santa Barbara today on Sirius today. Always the pleaser and a grade A show. There are so many A++ shows we now know exist in the vault. I think we know they are going to highlight them yet mix them in gingerly over time mixed with other, lesser known shows. I think that's how it's going to be. The Boxzilla model until they run out of releasable tapes in ~20 years? Frankly.. I'm ok with that, there is plenty of stellar stuff now left in the vault. My personal favorite release ever is the steamer trunk, but I still revisit the big box on occasion with enthusiasm. There is prime stuff in there. As for Cape Cod, it was a good show for '79.. but perhaps not the best of the year.
  • alvarhanso
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope
    Was pleasantly surprised by the Phish show the other night, this Runaway Antelope (with a stop from Makisupa Policeman) was vintage Phish, and mashed up 3 of their oldest songs, Runaway Jim, Run Like an Antelope, and Makisupa Policeman in an unplanned event. The looks on their faces as they go through it is priceless. I thought it was pre-planned from my spot on the lawn, but clearly they surprised themselves. It wasn't the best I've seen them, but it was very, very good. Hope those that watched the webcast here enjoyed it, sounds like Vguy did, and someone else who caught the bulk of the best stuff. First set was good, nothing outstanding. Second set was outstanding, and the encore was a good indicator they had fun. It was a bummer that they ended at 10:45 and clearly had another 15 minutes, but it was a great time with some old friends and some family having their first shows, including my buddy's 9 year old and his father in his 60s. Both had the time of their lives. Nearly 35 years ago, the people of Boise left feeling the same way. Music is a magical thing, and a really good band can make your problems dissolve away for 2-4 hours at a time, and also unite you with like minded people (who can still reasonably agree to disagree about nearly everything). The torch was lit long ago, but it still burns in towns across America and the world where these musical caravans trek seasonally. The music and spirit of the Dead live on. Speaking of which, it is now 26 days from September 7, and that means a treasure chest is being filled and readied for delivery soon. Wondrous surprises await! PS: Dave's Picks 6 has 2 excellent Dark Stars that are fantastic post-show traveling material. Also, We Bid You Goodnight takes on a very ominous feel in a driving thunderstorm with 60+ mph wind gusts.
  • Angry Jack Straw
    Joined:
    Led
    I would rather talk food than this release anyday. Just visited Leunig's Bistro. And old staple located in Burlington. Grabbed a plate of duck confit french fries and gravy with the wife, while the kids relished the truffle fries. Twice fried potatoes, silky gravy and fall apart mallard. Accompanied by a preserved lemon, basil and vodka lemonade. Right around the corner from Nectars, famous for their late night gravy fries and regularly hosting a band. Both highly overrated. Adirondacks and Lake Champlain to the fore, Green mountains to the aft. Good living. An East cosat version of Pearl Street in Boulder. Funny you mentioned the Cape Cod show. That was my first listen from TTATS. It got so much hype, I had to hear it. I found it kinda, meh, as well. I suspect the hype was nothing more than the band played Cape Cod. Not a bad show, just not outstanding. Enjoy your journey through the box. But at the end of the day, I think you will find yourself reaching for E72 more often than not after the initial few listens. Oh yeah. The Red Sox are rolling. Love it when yankee fan gets apoplectic.
  • Terrapin Moon
    Joined:
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad.
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad. If you want something bad: 10/30/83. weir is virtually non existent jerry will keep coming in and out. will not listen to this one again not worth the time. I cant even comment on playing cuz of it. I don't really feel like the playing is mediocre but due to the problems that plague this tape through out I can't ascertain that. Phish 2/13/87 would probly be more worthwhile than this one. I played it thinking hey maybe the mix would get better but then it got to the end of set I with Might As Well I was already in too deep and may as well be finished. it turned out to be a big lemon.
  • Deadicated
    Joined:
    Bear's Sonic Journals
    Should you be on the fence about the ABB, Fillmore East, February 1970 update, every pain has been taken to present it with the utmost quality. Jeffrey Norman, along with Plangent Processes, have made this an awesome release. Great liners and art work, too. Anything to add Hendrixfreak?
  • LedDed
    Joined:
    Paddy Melt
    I just had a paddy melt at a Red Sox/Patriots bar called, "The Elm," on Colfax Ave. in Denver. Colfax itself is worthy of a thesis. It went like this: I subbed out the onions for bacon, and the paddy was hand-formed and a true medium with a thin band of red in the middle. Marbled rye, swiss, and thousand island made this a delight along with a healthy, salted helping of freshly-cut pub chips. All washed down with Tito's and soda. Front row on 4/12/83 might be when you did die, Oro. Who knows if this is real or all a dream. Kayak nice stream of consciousness. You people are so much more entertaining, sincere and informative than the nightly news. I'll bet this room could solve most of the world's problems. But, no, wait... that was already done in the 1960s and nothing changed it's only gotten worse. Forget I mentioned it. I'm currently digesting that paddy by way of Cape Cod Coliseum, South Yarmouth, MA. October 27, 1979 on what was my then-eleventh birthday. Too bad I missed it. I've listened to at least one song and in good years, several from every 30 trips disc I've burned into iTunes over the last two days. This show is nothing remarkable, just Good 'Ol Grateful Dead. Which I suppose is remarkable in and of itself. I don't have enough wall space for all the posters and wall art that lies unframed in roll-up tubes as it is. I suppose I could add more. The Fillmore has an amazing collection of framed trippy posters of all the bands that have played there. Love that shit.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    My wife yelled at me....
    ....for apparently treating her like a child. So I gave her a sticker for standing up for herself.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years

"The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

*Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

As I have already posted a few times, this release sounds way better than the hissy, muddy cassettes I used to have. So, compared to the hissy, muddy cassette recordings of early 80’s shows that I used to have, I will give this recording a 10. And no, I am not that stupid. Not that stupid to try to compare the sound of a cassette master to that of a multi-track recording. Especially Eur 72 which was professionally recorded with the intention of creating a commercial release.
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

Appreciate your Bird Song feedback. I went back and gave them all another listen. The Dave' s Picks 11 is my newest and you are so right about the solo at the 3 min mark. Jerry just bends that one note over and over and then gets to work. As if to say 'you guys ready'? It's difficult to imagine them playing this in a darkened arena after watching them perform on the Sunshine Daydream Veneta movie. I also keep going over Berkeley to see if the soloing is as good, but I inevitably get so lost in the gloria of it all that I forget I'm supposed to be evaluating. Such is life. Icecrmcnkd I'm sorry but the audio here is a 1 or 2 out of 10 compared to the best sounding recording released. It's a 1 because there are none worse or few at best. That's a cute game you played calling it a 10 by comparing it to unpeofessional releases (wink wink).
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

The problem with recordings that are superior is that you hear every little nuance and note ... This is my opinion only... In ref. to Dave's 27, The band sounds Ok but I'll probably never listen to this set again as Jerry's vocals are barely acceptable. and in some cases painful to listen to.. . 1983 brought Jerry a crappy demeanor on stage and a huge heroin habit and it certainly shows in his performance... Take any pre heroin show from the beginning of the band and listen... There is clearly no comparison from the psychedelic era thru cocaine and up until heroin... Anything before his addiction is superior in every way and i wish they would stop releasing sub standard shows. There are too many good ones to put this in the category of great shows...
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

What shows from 1983 did you have on cassette that sounded better than DaP 27?
user picture

Member for

11 years 4 months
Permalink

Yes, for only 11 minutes long, this is a very concise yet perfect Birdsong. Not only is the beginning of Jer's first solo great (the slinky "get ready" bends you mentioned), but check out the 2nd guitar solo at 9:15~... Jerry starts with a few building licks over several measures (once again, kinda of a "are you ready?...) until he reaches a peak, THEN resumes the soaring, bending "bird in flight" thing all over. I've said it before, but if you showed Mozart the general gist of "Birdsong", THIS is how he'd map it out: each part of solos seem to logically connect to the next.... intro>body>conclusion. Despite the fact that it's not long, never goes too far "out there", and the energy is controlled and deliberate, this version is simply stunning. Kind of like a perfectly mapped-out studio version that they executed live, flawlessly. One of my favorite GD tracks of all time. But I'm curious to hear your answer to icecrmconkid's question.... If this recording is a "1" out of 10, What '83 releases or other early/mid 80's recordings do you feel are better?
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

Not saying it’s one of the best. But it is one that I always liked.
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

“A subscription business is perhaps the most reliable and predictable form of revenue” I’m ready to subscribe to Dave’s Picks 2019!
user picture

Member for

13 years 2 months
Permalink

Are there any bad Bird Songs out there? This is one of those songs were it got better over time, in my opinion. 7/26/87 is great. Loser & Cassidy both also got better over time, in my opinion.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years 2 months
Permalink

Nice, balanced post on your review of DaP 27. Just thought I'd say it, 'cause it hit a lot of the same chords I was feeling after a few listens.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years
Permalink

Hmm, so basically releases should be just pre-hiatus? So the 30-yr GD legacy is really about the first (less than, actually) decade? If the Dead were just a 9-year band, I would've stopped listening long ago. This is from Blair Jackson's Garcia bio: "Despite Garcia's plainly visible malaise, the Dead played better in 1983 than they had in 1982. In fact, they improved each year through the first half of the '80s, as if Garcia's deteriorating physical condition almost didn't matter." Of course we know he gets busted in Jan. 85 and (presumably) starts cleaning up. BJ continues, "The Dead's tours that summer and autumn [of 85] were unusually strong, with especially varied set lists, crisp and purposeful jamming and a higher level of energy onstage than anyone had seen in quite a while." No question, that summer of 85 is hot. And 89-90 is some of my absolutely favorite years. But so is 83-84, more so the more I listen to them. There's a sort of rushed (or is urgent the right word?), yet raw, 80s psychedelic sound. At the risk of hyperbole, it's the best, most energetic and raw sound since 73- so in nearly a decade.
user picture

Member for

11 years 4 months
Permalink

Agreed. But the recordings generally stink compared to the 70's offerings. Your comment totally ignores this fact. For each quote from someone saying the 80's had some great shows, there are 10 more quotes from Dick, Dave, and yes Blair Jackson questioning the 80's recordings' viability as official releases. Do you want to add some of those quotes to balance your comment, or should I?
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years
Permalink

No, I agree with you. And some of those patches are definitely sorta cringe-worthy. But as someone mentioned: they also highlight how much of a general improvement the sounds quality here is. Dave spoke (in the liner notes) about the "unfortunate at best" recordings from June 83 or in his words, "magnificent full shows for which no usable recording exists." My response was more so to snoone about the quality of the 83 performances (not the audio).
user picture

Member for

12 years
Permalink

Can we stop with the name calling? Let's assume nobody here is stupid and even if they are, the "smarter" ones should be smart enough and classy enough not to call them stupid. I've always agreed with the basic premise that all releases sound better than the cassettes I had. Maybe some people knew Betty and got tapes directly from her, but I got from a buddy, who got from unknown people that he met at shows. Is the recording of this show better or worse than others, of course. But I also go with the assumption that the "official" releases are the best available out there. True? I don't know, I just assume that. I'll take all official releases, it's the anal completist in me. On this release I like the Looks Like Rain, this is the closest to the greatest Rain ever done (4/16/83 Meadowland, NJ). Don't believe me, take a listen, Garcia's on fire in the last minute or two, his notes hit like raindrops at the moment it goes from a drizzle to a downpour. And Weir yelling is in perfect form (can't take no more fuckin rain today) https://archive.org/details/gd83-04-16.sbd.miller.28294.sbeok.flacf/gd8… Don't agree, then you're a fucking idiot :-) (notice I didn't say stupid :-)) I agree with whoever below that I seldom will listen to a whole show, but listen to "parts" and there is ALWAYS a good part. Finally, where is Jim (JiminMD), I'm assuming on vacation, but I still worry.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years
Permalink

I'll second that, Dennis. We're also not discussing the fate of Western civilization, we're discussing a band- a band beyond description?
user picture

Member for

11 years 4 months
Permalink

Agreed - but '83 had more great MOMENTS or sets than complete, great "shows". Brilliant peaks followed by lotsa murky valleys... Jerry's '83 uninspired heroin drenched brain, morbid obesity/lack of stamina and voice, and general grumpy-cat staring-emptily-over-my-belly-at-just-the-tips-of-my-wallabees-over-my-glasses-teetering-on-the-end-of-my-nose demeanor made "inspired complete shows" mostly a thing of the past. But there are some amazing '83 nuggets for sure. The '83 TTATS show (10/21/83 in Woostah!!!) is a goody! I attended 10/15/83 (my 2nd show) with the St. Stephen and the RIPPING Big RxR Blues, but honestly much of that show (generally considered one of the years best) plods along unremarkably. Kinda like watching Sinatra in his later years - yes some inspired moments and glimpses of the old charisma (being reaaaally generous on the charisma based on my comment that ends my first paragraph), but from an execution standpoint just a shadow of their former glory.
user picture

Member for

11 years 4 months
Permalink

I just mentioned my second show, and Dennis (the guy asking for an end to the name-calling - what a stupid idiot ;) then mentions my first!! 4/16/83 with Looks Like Rain. This was one of my favorite songs and I was so happy they played it. But even as a 15-yr old newbie watching from center-ice, 8 rows up on the left side, I knew that they weren't "on" this night (LLRain WAS good, but I loved this song too much to be objective). 4/17/83, the next night, was better though sadly I wasn't there. I was HUGE into CSNY at the time and was stoked to see Stephen Stills sit in. Quite a first-show treat. Then my 2nd show I got the Hartford St. Stephen - the Gods were smiling on me, making sure to set the hook hard. And it's still there, though I really haven't listened to much Dead for a few months... breather....
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

First I want to once again thank you guys for the hard work and great care obviously put into the Dave's Picks Volume 27 release. I appreciate the release on a historical level, as there are not many early 1980s shows in my collection. With that said,I had to take a break from East Coast shows between fall 1980 through 1984. My first show in a while, and I believe it was in October 1984 at Brendan Byrne in East Rutherford was a bit of an upset. In those days, there was a ticket service called Ticketron, and I bought a ticket on the day of the first show,rented a car, and drove out to Jersey.The seat was right to the side of Jerry, and was stunned when the band came out by his physical appearance, and demeanor. This was not the Garcia I last saw at Nassau in May 1980. Something was wrong.Don't need to elaborate any further, but with that said I think this release is important in context that it reflects the changes happening with the band in regard to live performances.In the end, glad to be a subscriber, and appreciate every release! Hope everyone enjoys the rest of the summer...
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

Don't believe the hyperbole either way. This show is not the best show with amazing sound and definitive versions of songs, but it is also not a terrible show with awful sound that is unlistenable. My opinion is this: I like receiving a show from an otherwise little tapped era; the sound is not crystal clear like many 70s or late 80s recordings but it is much better than the Alpine 82 Dick's Picks and the Spectrum 82 Road Trips; and the performance is generally just fine-- again, not definitive, but good enough. In brief, I like adding this show to my collection. Songs that stuck out as good versions to me on this recording: I love the Wang Dang Doodle opener and the Jack Straw that follows is good enough. I always like Minglewood and the Deal closer is a scorcher. The Help-Slip-Frank is solid (not better than any in 76 or 77 though), I think the Estimated is lackluster and the Eyes is rushed. The jam and space segments are interesting. The jam in Throwing Stones I will describe as 'Chaos.' I am not sure what is happening there-- I haven't listened to early versions of it, so maybe this is the norm for the era? Regardless, that 'solo' is just noise to me. Maybe another listen will reveal more. The Black Peter has some really rough vocals. I agree with Slow Noodle, two Black Peters released in the past year run circles around this one. Jerry's vocals are pretty bad here. BP is not my favorite tune, but the version on Berkeley 72 made me sit up and take notice-- just an exquisite version, beautiful and perfect in every way. This one, not so much. I will probably listen to this show sometimes and as I said earlier-- good to have a decent show from an era without many releases.
user picture

Member for

15 years 1 month
Permalink

Yet another reminder why I can't get into that band. Happy for all of you do enjoy them tho'
user picture

Member for

11 years 4 months
Permalink

Thank you for the sober, well written post. Your objectivity tells me your opinions are likely reliable. Any post that is all positive or all negative tends to just be unreliable noise by era hard-liners with an axe to grind. Era rhetoric gets absurd, sometimes comical.
user picture

Member for

6 years 9 months
Permalink

Seriously, what's with all the name calling? Taste in anything is subjective, especially when it comes to music, art, film, etc. It's all about how the music resonates with the individual. If it makes you feel good, then it's doing its job. Again, Jerry's often quoted licorice analogy comes to mind. Some dig black, some dig red, some dig both, and others don't dig licorice at all. The need for validation through a sense of sameness is one of the primary causes of human discontent and unhappiness. Just because you don't see it or hear it the same as someone else, doesn't make them wrong or stupid, etc. Personally, this show is like nails on a chalkboard to my ears. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate its historical relevance, nor does it negate anyone else's overall appreciation for it. I'm on this site to experience different perspectives, find out about shows that I'm unfamiliar with, and learn things about the Dead that I may not already know. But the immaturity and insecurity of name calling honestly kills the vibe for me. Just saying.
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

worth your time also 4/19/82
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

they eventually adopted the Samson and Delilah chord-y thing, but early versions had the type of jam you hear on 9/2/83. not sure when they started the S&D chords. sometime in 84? opinion alert: I happen to like the the more chaotic jamming approach than the S&D chords. 1000 opinions in Deadheadland it's very similar to a political thing: one person's president is another person's lying sack of shit. 9/2/83's great! 9/2/83 sux! and the band keeps playing on
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

Unless you think I called someone a hyperbole, I don't think I did any name calling-- hope that wasn't directed at me, SkullTrip. I guess I was trying to say that there will be haters and lovers of the show, but on a whole for many of us, this show is adequate.
user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

94 and 95 rocks shirdeep. phish should put that phil lesh show out sometime. why not? they put out the one out where Weir played with them, on Dead songs on the recent fall tour
user picture

Member for

6 years 9 months
Permalink

Not sure why that would even cross your mind, Estimated-Eyes. Guess I should have been more specific though. I'm responding to people being called "stupid" and "assholes" for various reasons in the thread. Just seems juvenile and unnecessary. And thanks, Thin. I take that as a compliment, idiot that I are.
user picture

Member for

16 years
Permalink

The Grateful Dead was not just about good music thats why I think you get mixed reviews on shows and you can't compare shows from one era to another. You know The Dead probably thought they made enough music over the years to make everyone happy, but I don't think they succeeded when you read these threads.
user picture

Member for

11 years 4 months
Permalink

Thanks for taking a joke from this asshole in stride. Well done. I had a colleague who used to pipe up in meetings after someone (usually me) had voiced an opinion or question, half under his breath, with perfect comedic timing: "idiot..." Yes it was funny every time.
user picture

Member for

15 years 1 month
Permalink

Which Dave's Picks has the best sound quality? Top five. I'm not familiar enough with all of them to make a list but would love opinions.Last 2 I listened to have good sound. DaP 18 76 Orpheum (though Bob's guitar is missing.) DaP 13 74 Winterland. Thanks.
user picture

Member for

6 years 9 months
Permalink

All good, brother. I live my life for the punchline and tend not to take things personally. Just how I'm wired. So your post gave me a solid chuckle.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

11 years 3 months
Permalink

I don't think the real problem here is this show, whatever its (obvious) flaws. It's that this is part of a subscription series, and the fact that it's getting such strongly negative reviews demonstrates that it's definitely considered by many to be a subpar show FOR THIS SERIES. If this just came out as a release that anyone can buy, any time, I wouldn't care. I would have listened to the sound clips, and probably wouldn't have bought it...even though most of the shows I saw were square in the middle of this era. But because Dave's Picks are set up as a 4-releases-per-year subscription series, I got this as a result of subscribing. Here's my experience with this release: When announced, I felt a little thrill. "Oh, an 80s release. Maybe the tiny but very vocal minority who bitch about EVERY SINGLE 70s RELEASE will finally chill out a bit. Maybe, when the next Pick after this one is back to the 70s again, they won't complain" (I won't hold my breath.) But I was glad I'd be getting it. I watched Dave's entire seaside chat, and began to feel some trepidation. When he admitted he is prone to hyperbole, then declared that the Dead really made Wang Dang Doodle their own here, I started to worry. Anyone who hasn't heard it, check out Koko Taylor singing that tune. Then listen to Bob Weir sing it. You have to admit, it's a white boy trying to sing the blues, and Koko has more soul in her little finger than ol' Bobby has in his entire body. I love Bob, but gimme a break. I get the discs. Wang Dang Doodle is actually not bad, though you can hear Jerry's vocal struggles right out of the gate, even on harmony. Then Jack Straw, which is pretty much a train wreck. It's mainly downhill from there. A few bright spots, but many rough ones. I've already posted about this show, so I'm not going to go through a song-by-song critique. But this performance is the kind of thing that could clear a room if your guests have overstayed their visit. I wonder how many of the last, say, five releases before this led to words like "disappointing," "cringeworthy," or "awful" in their respective threads on the board? Remember, these comments are coming from Deadheads, not just civilians. Releasing this is not the problem. The real problem is foisting this on subscribers, who already shelled out good money for it without knowing they would get it. When I heard the combination of shaky performance and subpar audio, I was dismayed; by the time I got through the multiple audience patches, I was INSULTED. Like I posted before, I was relieved when I finally got through disc 3. I've never had that experience with a Dead show - I avoid the bad recordings and performances in the archive, and skip what I don't like in my own collection. But I needed to at least make sure the discs didn't have any skips. As a Deadhead, the relieved-it's-over experience was a jarring one. I could see a couple tracks from this making it onto a Road Trips-type compilation, or as filler for something else, but I don't think it was release-worthy. I'll still most likely subscribe again next year, but if I got 2-3 in a row like this, I wouldn't subscribe again. I work for myself, so I can pull the trigger in real time on a la carte releases, and that's what I'd do.
user picture

Member for

13 years 2 months
Permalink

If you don't like it, sell it. Someone will buy it. It doesn't really make sense to complain about being forced upon a release because you subscribed. If you sell it as new, you can probably get more money than what you paid for it, if you want. Other than that, its just impatience. Variety is the spice of life and this band probably offers more variety than any other band ever! Think about that and be grateful...then just wait for one you do enjoy to come down the golden road.
user picture

Member for

7 years 2 months
Permalink

Grateful Dead/Dead & Company guitarist Bob Weir will embark on a fall tour with bassist Don Was and drummer Jay Lane under the moniker Bob Weir and Wolf Bros. Weir, Was and Lane confirmed 19 dates spanning October 16 – November 18. The new band will explore songs of the Grateful Dead and more in a trio setting. Bob Weir & Wolf Bros will kick off the tour at Grand Sierra Resort & Casino in Reno on October 16. From there, the trio will visit Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Portland (Oregon), Seattle, Missoula, Salt Lake City, Albuquerque and Denver ahead of a Halloween show in at The Chicago Theatre in Chicago. The tour continues with stops in Nashville, Louisville and Syracuse along with a two-night stand at The Capitol Theatre in Port Chester, New York. The three-piece will perform at Washington, D.C.’s Warner Theatre on November 12. Bob Weir & Wolf Bros conclude the run with stops in Philadelphia, Boston and New York City. A pre-sale will be held using Ticketmaster’s Verified Fan program. Registration has started here and will run through Monday, August 6 at 5 p.m. ET. DATES: Bob Weir and Wolf Bros Tour Dates October 16 Reno, NV—Grand Sierra Resort and Casino October 18 Los Angeles, CA—The Theatre at Ace Hotel October 20 Santa Barbara, CA—Arlington Theatre October 22 Portland, OR—Keller Auditorium October 23 Seattle, WA—Moore Theatre October 24 Missoula, MT—Wilma Theatre October 26 Salt Lake City, UT—Eccles Theater October 27 Albuquerque, NM—Kiva Auditorium October 29 Denver, CO—Paramount Theatre October 31 Chicago, IL—Chicago Theatre November 5 Nashville, TN—Ryman Auditorium November 6 Louisville, KY—Palace Theatre November 8 Syracuse, NY—Landmark Theatre November 9 Port Chester, NY—The Capitol Theatre November 10 Port Chester, NY—The Capitol Theatre November 12 Washington, DC—Warner Theatre November 13 Philadelphia, PA—The Fillmore November 16 Boston, MA—Boch Center Wang Theatre November 18 New York, NY—Beacon Theatre Read more: https://www.relix.com/news/detail/bob_weir_announces_fall_tour_with_wol…
user picture

Member for

10 years 6 months
Permalink

9/17/82 Cumberland County 1st Throwing stones and I think 1st Touch. Good show..est/eyes, great setlist.
user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

The best sounding to my ears have been (off the top of my head) 21 4/2/73, which I think has a ton to do with it being on 10" reels instead of 7" (take that how you will). The clarity and definition on that recording is simply stunning, in particular I had a slack-jawed reaction to Eyes> China Doll with Phil's very quiet, yet still audible touches accentuating China Doll in a masterful way. The 11, 11/17/72 was a great tape as well. 26 11/17/71 was my commute music this morning, the first Other One in particular, and Phil was thunderous, Bob and Jerry were both quite present, and Keith sounded good, and has one of his few solos I can recall somewhere in that show, with Jerry even calling for the piano solo. The Wall of Sound Picks 2, 9, 19 are not my favorites because of the limitations of capturing the WoS properly and the vocal issues. They have a good presence for most of the instruments, but the drums can be hit or miss on WoS recordings, and there's almost always adjustments for the first 2-3 songs that afterwards, it settles down. DaP 13 is a proto-WoS show and it has the aforementioned issues that take a few songs to straighten out, but by the meat of the show, you're transported far away on a cloud of fantastic music. DaP 10 12/12/69 and the accompanying bonus disc from the previous night (one of the greatest single Dead discs?) are masterpieces of recording from Bear. I feel like I'm in a tiny club and can picture myself there from his Sonic Journal. To make it easier to read, and a more concise personal top 5 for sound quality: DaP 21 4/2/73 DaP 11 11/17/72 DaP 10 12/12/69 and 12/11/69 bonus disc DaP 26 11/17/71 (will have to check the bonus disc and disc 3 again for 12/14/71, but seem to recall not being as blown away by that show's sound) DaP 14 3/26/72 (could be totally biased on this one, I seem to like it a LOT more than others here, mainly because of that TOO>M&MU>TOO>Wharf Rat) Bonus 6th choice: DaP 8 11/30/80 the outlier as the only Matrix in the Series thus far, I think it shows how to put out a good cassette master SBD
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Boise, Idaho invaded by goats. Hahaha By the way, does anybody look at all those Phish things that get posted on this site, presumably in error?
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

12 years
Permalink

Dave's subscriptions make it clear that you get 4 shows a year. I know they hype sound quality and overall I think they get it right even when it's a great board from 1983. Anyhow, some years sound better than others but I really do think Dave % CO. do try to give us cool shows to enjoy! Cheers!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

12 years
Permalink

don't hear how shitty this show sounds....maybe because I got on the bus around 1988 and started collecting tapes from many different eras I tend to like them all... I dunno, I like this show! I think it comes with many cool/great moments
user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

Nope. Perhaps somebody is trying to convert Deadheads to Phish, but I just scroll past them. I like Phish, but this is dead.net, so I'm curious, too, at the reasoning behind the spate of them with no text around it to offer anything to the discussion. I like people talking about other bands here especially newer stuff that I don't listen to/wouldn't be exposed to due to my own listening habits being fairly closed off to new stuff given the plethora of stuff available to listen to from the bands I already am into. But it works better when there's discussion, not random posting of songs. For example, it wasn't here, but on another site, I was recently exposed to Gentle Giant, and was absolutely blown away by their fierce musicianship, amd I'm appreciative of that. Just posting Phish vids when no one is talking about them is odd indeed. And since I went and brought them up, and have given appropriate context, how about some insanely complex Gentle Giant live: https://youtu.be/UM-yGcpaY_4
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

I think that all those Phish posts are from a person that forgot what website they logged into. There’s like 3 people here who actually care, and I think that all 3 are the same person.
user picture

Member for

14 years 7 months
Permalink

Dreading - audio wise, I would rate this show an 8.5/10. The Cornell release audio sounded bad - soupy/muddy, far away, and I rate the audio for that 5/10. Really, the audio on this release is just fine, real good in fact. I have heard some real bad audio, and this is not bad - at all! Dave L. and TPTB should continue to release more '80's shows like this, use the master recording and splice with aud patches as needed. The band's performance, again, real strong, even the lyrical flubs don't distract from the overall intensity and jamming going on with the boys.
user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

Come on man. That's just silly. That recording is clear as a freaking bell, and you say DaP 27 is an 8.5/10? Stop trolling, or go get your hearing checked.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....but it sounds better than Cornell? Let me check the calendar. Nope. It's not April 1st. You almost had me there.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years 2 months
Permalink

It's been an interesting roller coaster on this board lately. Like a pack of psychedelic colored licorice, choose your color. Here's one example. Black Peter. Some like it. But lots of people seem to hate this version, and mhammond had the funniest crack about Garcia nearly dying singing it. Oddly, that's one reason I liked it. Normally I'm not such a fan of that song, as it can drag on forever and the so-called harmonies can be utterly atrocious. On DaP 27 though, I actually sort of liked it. Sure, Garcia's voice is ragged throughout the show, but he somehow relaxes it a bit on parts of Black Peter (even though it's still rough) and goes deeper in tone than he usually does on that song. For once, it gave me the sense that he WAS Black Peter, not just some white guy singing about him. He really was dying, and his delivery showed it, but in a way that got my attention rather than making me grimace. It's not my favorite version (I've only heard 2-3 that I thought were really great), but it was something definitely different than usual, and worthwhile from my standpoint. Especially because this ain't my favorite era, so I was looking for a few tunes that stood out as being different and made me notice. On a different note, there's a couple of interesting shows coming up at Weir's Sweetwater in Mill Valley for those who are in the area. Barry Zito, the ex Oakland A's and Giants pitcher (who had an incredible house on a ridge in Marin County that I got to tour vicariously online when he sold it recently) has become a wandering troubadour with an acoustic guitar. He's performing at the Sweetwater on August 8th. But more noteworthy is Julian Lage, one of the best guitarists alive (mostly jazz, but mixes in some rock, folk, country and classical, and can play about anything), will be there on Sept. 21. Unfortunately I'll be out of town, or would be there in a heartbeat, to see him at such a small venue. It's strange, to see that Lage's show, for one of the best guitarists in the world, is cheaper than Barry Zito's show. Goes to show the power of celebrity, I suppose. https://www.sweetwatermusichall.com/calendar
product sku
081227931599