• 1,815 replies
    heatherlew
    Default Avatar
    Joined:

    "The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

    And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

    Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

    *Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Well Said
    Right on VGuy. It is what it is.. and it's good.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope.....
    ....with a Makisupa thrown in just to keep it interesting. Rewatching it now. Kush.And why does one ponder on Rhinos and Dave's decisions? I will keep subscribing until the end. Stop worrying about what other people think. That's a problem with society today. Whether it be music or anything else. Grow a pair and either crank it or shelve it and stop worrying about everyone else. My son is hooked on reaction videos. Trying to break that chain. To let some random soul decide or sway what you think of something is dangerous. Think for yourself. That's a concept that is disappearing in this day and age. I've seen the future, and it's leaning towards one not being a one, but sliding into a hivemind. There was a Black Mirror episode that nailed it. If your not a five star, your trash. Wait for it.
  • dreading
    Joined:
    Kayak Guy
    I was enjoying your post until I got to this part: you wrote "to say this music is unworthy of release is wrong. the whole idea of Dave's Picks is to take whats left from the vault and put out the whole shows in the best quality possible and people that subscribe should understand this" According to Dave, Dave's Picks is for the best in quality shows from an audio and performance stand point. Many do not feel this standard was met, nor did they for DaP 20. Boise doesn't pass the litmus test from either angle from way more people than usual for a release. DaP 8 didn't have a backlash like this. THAT'S a great show that sounds great. Boise is worthy of release for a DL series or standalone, but certainly not a DaP release, based on Dave and Rhino's mission statement of audio quality and performance quality FIRST. So why did they do it? I think Dave and Rhino know that they wouldn't sell as many units as a standalone show outside the Dave's Picks series (or they felt they could possibly lose money). By releasing it as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, they satisfy a contingency of subscribers who have been complaining over the lack of early 80s. And there is little to no risk for Rhino to put it out there as a 3rd quarter Dave's Picks, since the subscriptions are already paid for. The risk element will change if they go with 80s/90s for DaP 28/29 and the shows aren't DaP 8 quality grand slams. But as is, I think it's relatively low risk, even with the large number of complaints about audio and performance issues. If DaP 28 is 80s/90s and the announcement for 2019 subscriptions features 80s/90s, I imagine a drop off in subscriptions would result. But I don't think that will happen, they're not there yet. I believe Dave and Rhino know they were in a tough spot with the early 80s. They could potentially lose the support of some subscribers by continuing to ignore this period, or they could roll the dice with a show that isn't up to the standard of audio and performance quality that Dave's Picks has been so far, and reach for a happy medium. I think that's what they did and that's what they achieved (not because they didn't want to release a grand slam from 1983, but because, as we've been hearing over and over, there simply aren't good tapes available from this period). This show is a win for them in the short term. If they return to "business as usual" with the 60s and 70s, they will keep their 18K subscribers, and probably continue to increase the yearly subscription numbers. If they go 80s / 90s for 28 & 29, subscription sales will probably drop off, as the comments here clearly demonstrate there are large numbers of people who do not think this show passes the litmus test for audio and performance quality (I believe the releases will still sell out, just not as quickly, as most of the 18K goes to subscribers). While it's great that a lot of people liked this release, it's irrelevant in the face of the negative feedback. ENOUGH people wrote in to say it doesn't pass the litmus test. "Enough" does not have to be a majority, merely a quorum. How do we know this? Because the dissenters for this release are out in record numbers (as well as for DaP 20, after which it took two years for another 80s show to be released). And people do have a right to say this show is unworthy of release for a Dave's Picks. There's no getting around the mission statement Dave and Rhino made and often repeat, indicating the best audio and performance quality shows would be the Dave's Picks standard. They came up short here, and the people have spoken. There are clearly other shows that could have been released in its stead, just maybe not from '83. One of the RFK shows from '89 would have met the Dave's standard, but it's a multi-track, they sound tight, and there is greater profit to be made putting that one out as an individual release. That being said, I think I would have done the same thing Rhino did here, given the point in the road they find themselves (they can't ignore the early 80s forever without losing some subscribers). The real problem here is that they also said they would represent all eras, but they (apparentky) do not truly have the tapes to do so. My points are simply: 1) yes people DO have a right to say Boise '83 is unworthy of release as a Dave's Picks, because the mission statement was not met. Sure, one could try to argue that sound and performance quality are subjective, but too many people already agree this show came up short, so the polls are in and the numbers are significant. Further, there is NO Caveat Emptor on Dave's Picks. Dave has been saying since day one (and repeating often) that only the best sounding shows are slated for this series. If they start to put the Caveat Emptor you quoted from Dick's Picks on the Dave's Picks CDs and subscription advertisements, THEN we can expect something like Boise. You seemed a little bothered that people dinged this release for audio issues, but words were spoken, deals were made, and now there's a letdown. There ARE better sounding shows available, just maybe not from '83. It is you who should understand this point, not the other way around, where you imply that subscribers should have an awareness that sub-STANDARD audio is part of the deal. No. Standard is the operative word here, this release is unusually poor, and the complaints are coming in droves. 2) releasing something from this year was still the right choice for Rhino. As I said, the game for them is to continue to grow the subscriber base, and while DaP 27 is an encroachment on the mission statement, there are a significant number of subscribers who wanted it, and Rhino has now satisfied that contingency (for the time being). Strategy: give them their fill now, while there is still plenty of top shelf 70s on tap and arriving on doorsteps within a month's time. 3) point number 2 is only a good move for them if they get back to the 60s and 70s for DaP 28 and 29. There are still plenty of shows left to do so. Continuing with the 80s and 90s would be a mistake, if the goal is to keep their 18K and growing subscribers. 4) I think the real story here, is that the reality is just like Dave has been telling us for a long time now. There aren't too many shows from this. To choose from. I'm not expecting any Grand Slams from 1983 anytime soon. Dave clearly has some familiarity with this show, and I think he probably felt it was the best available. As a collective unit we asked for it and we got it.
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Big Box
    I like the big box.. but comparing it to FW69 or E72 is like comparing apple juice to hard cider. There is good stuff to be found in the big box. Continuing with your thread earlier today, I think at this point we know pretty much what's left in the vault to be released. I think their strategy is to wow us when necessary and at other times keep their power dry so they can live and fight for another day. So a mix with some greatness sprinkled in. Interesting.. they played 2/26/77, Swing Auditorium Santa Barbara today on Sirius today. Always the pleaser and a grade A show. There are so many A++ shows we now know exist in the vault. I think we know they are going to highlight them yet mix them in gingerly over time mixed with other, lesser known shows. I think that's how it's going to be. The Boxzilla model until they run out of releasable tapes in ~20 years? Frankly.. I'm ok with that, there is plenty of stellar stuff now left in the vault. My personal favorite release ever is the steamer trunk, but I still revisit the big box on occasion with enthusiasm. There is prime stuff in there. As for Cape Cod, it was a good show for '79.. but perhaps not the best of the year.
  • alvarhanso
    Joined:
    Runaway Antelope
    Was pleasantly surprised by the Phish show the other night, this Runaway Antelope (with a stop from Makisupa Policeman) was vintage Phish, and mashed up 3 of their oldest songs, Runaway Jim, Run Like an Antelope, and Makisupa Policeman in an unplanned event. The looks on their faces as they go through it is priceless. I thought it was pre-planned from my spot on the lawn, but clearly they surprised themselves. It wasn't the best I've seen them, but it was very, very good. Hope those that watched the webcast here enjoyed it, sounds like Vguy did, and someone else who caught the bulk of the best stuff. First set was good, nothing outstanding. Second set was outstanding, and the encore was a good indicator they had fun. It was a bummer that they ended at 10:45 and clearly had another 15 minutes, but it was a great time with some old friends and some family having their first shows, including my buddy's 9 year old and his father in his 60s. Both had the time of their lives. Nearly 35 years ago, the people of Boise left feeling the same way. Music is a magical thing, and a really good band can make your problems dissolve away for 2-4 hours at a time, and also unite you with like minded people (who can still reasonably agree to disagree about nearly everything). The torch was lit long ago, but it still burns in towns across America and the world where these musical caravans trek seasonally. The music and spirit of the Dead live on. Speaking of which, it is now 26 days from September 7, and that means a treasure chest is being filled and readied for delivery soon. Wondrous surprises await! PS: Dave's Picks 6 has 2 excellent Dark Stars that are fantastic post-show traveling material. Also, We Bid You Goodnight takes on a very ominous feel in a driving thunderstorm with 60+ mph wind gusts.
  • Angry Jack Straw
    Joined:
    Led
    I would rather talk food than this release anyday. Just visited Leunig's Bistro. And old staple located in Burlington. Grabbed a plate of duck confit french fries and gravy with the wife, while the kids relished the truffle fries. Twice fried potatoes, silky gravy and fall apart mallard. Accompanied by a preserved lemon, basil and vodka lemonade. Right around the corner from Nectars, famous for their late night gravy fries and regularly hosting a band. Both highly overrated. Adirondacks and Lake Champlain to the fore, Green mountains to the aft. Good living. An East cosat version of Pearl Street in Boulder. Funny you mentioned the Cape Cod show. That was my first listen from TTATS. It got so much hype, I had to hear it. I found it kinda, meh, as well. I suspect the hype was nothing more than the band played Cape Cod. Not a bad show, just not outstanding. Enjoy your journey through the box. But at the end of the day, I think you will find yourself reaching for E72 more often than not after the initial few listens. Oh yeah. The Red Sox are rolling. Love it when yankee fan gets apoplectic.
  • Terrapin Moon
    Joined:
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad.
    dave's 27 isn't all that bad. If you want something bad: 10/30/83. weir is virtually non existent jerry will keep coming in and out. will not listen to this one again not worth the time. I cant even comment on playing cuz of it. I don't really feel like the playing is mediocre but due to the problems that plague this tape through out I can't ascertain that. Phish 2/13/87 would probly be more worthwhile than this one. I played it thinking hey maybe the mix would get better but then it got to the end of set I with Might As Well I was already in too deep and may as well be finished. it turned out to be a big lemon.
  • Deadicated
    Joined:
    Bear's Sonic Journals
    Should you be on the fence about the ABB, Fillmore East, February 1970 update, every pain has been taken to present it with the utmost quality. Jeffrey Norman, along with Plangent Processes, have made this an awesome release. Great liners and art work, too. Anything to add Hendrixfreak?
  • LedDed
    Joined:
    Paddy Melt
    I just had a paddy melt at a Red Sox/Patriots bar called, "The Elm," on Colfax Ave. in Denver. Colfax itself is worthy of a thesis. It went like this: I subbed out the onions for bacon, and the paddy was hand-formed and a true medium with a thin band of red in the middle. Marbled rye, swiss, and thousand island made this a delight along with a healthy, salted helping of freshly-cut pub chips. All washed down with Tito's and soda. Front row on 4/12/83 might be when you did die, Oro. Who knows if this is real or all a dream. Kayak nice stream of consciousness. You people are so much more entertaining, sincere and informative than the nightly news. I'll bet this room could solve most of the world's problems. But, no, wait... that was already done in the 1960s and nothing changed it's only gotten worse. Forget I mentioned it. I'm currently digesting that paddy by way of Cape Cod Coliseum, South Yarmouth, MA. October 27, 1979 on what was my then-eleventh birthday. Too bad I missed it. I've listened to at least one song and in good years, several from every 30 trips disc I've burned into iTunes over the last two days. This show is nothing remarkable, just Good 'Ol Grateful Dead. Which I suppose is remarkable in and of itself. I don't have enough wall space for all the posters and wall art that lies unframed in roll-up tubes as it is. I suppose I could add more. The Fillmore has an amazing collection of framed trippy posters of all the bands that have played there. Love that shit.
  • Vguy72
    Joined:
    My wife yelled at me....
    ....for apparently treating her like a child. So I gave her a sticker for standing up for herself.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years 1 month

"The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

*Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

You know it's funny you mentioned it. After I put it on this morning for the drive in, I started wondering if I was hearing Bruce, not Vince. So many shows, so little time. I was in a Throwing Stones frenzy at the time. I also recall a killer one that had a reprise a few songs later. I want to say DL series or Road Trips, but I remember there smooth synths, not piano. I'll dig around for it....
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

My favorite Roxy Music song. I’ve been up all night Party time wasting It’s too much fun This version is better https://youtu.be/hHKFDPsaASg I have a DVD with Roxy Music from 1971. The DVD also has T. Rex on it. I don’t need TV When I got T. Rex All the young dudes....
user picture

Member for

16 years 1 month
Permalink

The debate about this pick is not steeped where the sound quality is or is not; though it may seem. For me, the sound is exactly what I expected. It’s an 80’s recording sprinkled with Jeffrey Norman’s magic dust. If you (which is YOU) have listened to the archive 80's recordings, minus the latter mulitracks, then you know what the 80’s “sound” is all about. There is only so much the good Doctor Norman can do. The sound quality is rich, but certainly not in the way that those 70's recordings are rich. I did the side by side Pepsi challenge with this Dave’s next to Dave’s 23 McArthur Ct., Oregon. The results were not stunning. Dave’s 23 sounded better; but for craps sake! not sooo much better that we need to throw Dave’s 27 out with the bath water. This is great show and worthy of repeat listens. No dust collecting on a shelf. I love Brent’s organ grinder twinkle sounds. I dig the dink, dink, dink…..dink. I also love his soulful voice. This is the distinguished sound of this recording / release. Sure Bobby is way up, but Brent’s presence sets this release apart from the others. Keep the releases coming! The fact that it rains down live Grateful Dead shows all year long keeps me smiling! Rock on rockers! Cheers!
user picture

Member for

7 years 1 month
Permalink

I love the entertainment you bring to this board space brother. You pick April 24th 1978, Daves pick 7 to go after?!? I'll get to that in a minute. From a factual basis, I don't think I've seen a more heavily disliked show in Daves picks than this one except for maybe the Boulder debacle that was Dave's Picks 20. I think half the comments may be about how bad the band sounds. But you're an 80s cheerleader I got that and I love it, I can just picture you with the skirt and pom poms. Dave's Picks 7 has more outstanding tracks on it than I can count on one hand. Heady version where the fans vote, there's a million songs in the top 5 all time versions ffrom that show for goodness sakes. Scarlet Fire 4th place Me and my Uncle 1st place Big River 2nd place Brown Eyed Women 3rd place Music Never Stopped 1st place Promised Land 2nd place Cassidy 1st place Werewolves of London 2nd place The final tally: 3 Gold 3 Silver 1 Bronze And let's face it Scarlet Fire had Cornell to compete with so may as well be a bronze.
user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

Is this Box of Rain that I'm cranking from April 2nd 1973. I'm having a blast prepping for "The Box". It's been 73/74 Fetivus this week. I guess I should have posted this on the other page. Oh well what are we talking about here, Dave's Picks 7. That was my first Dave's Picks. I bought it after reading how good the music never stopped is. It's no joke folks. I don't remember much about the Big River and me and my uncle, but I much prefer those pre hiatus. The Scarlet fire is pretty solid, let it burn let it burn let it burn. It is a ripping Promised Land, even though the opening lyrics get missed or flubbed or something I forget which. Anyway I'm not sure how Dave's Picks 7 ends up in a worst of conversation but, I don't know how accurate that is. Definitely one of the better shows from 1978. I think it might even be in Rolling Stones top 20 shows. That being said, I think I also prefer the show from the 22nd which was Dave's Picks 15 that space mentioned. I think the first set of that show is almost flawless. Although it does have a couple pallets in a row that I'm not fond of. The second set is pretty solid too. I definitely don't have to fit over the equalizers much on this one either. I am in full babble mode how long has this been going on for? Feels like forever, what was in that stuff I smoked. Good luck hippie chick. Yours in coherence, KeithFan2112 P.S. This DaP 21 sounds unreal. I'm talking audio at the moment. If "The Box" sounds this good we going to get high high yes sir.
user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

I remember that episode stoltzfus. Man that brings back memories. I think a lot has to do with what I listen to DaP 27 on, at least for me. It sounds much better in the car than on headphones to my ears. I also prefer this early 80s keyboard sound to the late eighties. I would say it's definitely growing on me. At least the parts I've been listening to, disc 2 mostly. I like the raunchy tone on Jerry's guitar, is that the Tiger?
user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

Spacebrother and I agree on DaP 7 as weak. The Music Never Stopped is very good, but I don't recall anything else that stands out to me. Yes Jerry says "let it burn, let it burn, let it burn" in Fire, but there's nothing special to me about that Scarlet Fire musically. The novelty of the briefest of Stayin Alive teases does nothing for me either. And I like Werewolves of London as a song, but also a relative novelty. But, just to prevent the world from spinning on its axis, my points of divergence with Space would be that while this would rank below almost every other DaP for me, 27 and 20, and possibly 4 are all right there with it, if not below. The challenge though was for a 70s official release worse than 27, so obviously 20 doesn't meet that criteria; still 4 and 7 are my bottom of the barrel 70s releases. The most glaring issue with DaP 7 for me is Bob's slide "playing". More like the sound of 2 street cats making love while someone steps on their tails. But on DaP 27, 5+ years later, it ain't any better. And you don't have the Healy effects on vocals on DaP 7. Another place Space and I agree: DaP 15 from 2 days before is fantastic. Especially, the Deal and Wharf Rat. Jerry botches his first Wharf solo (or is slightly out of tune), but definitely makes up for it with a second go at it. Also, it's fairly ironic that my agreement is with Space and my disagreement is with KF, so this is like Elaine's trip to Bizarro World to continue the Seinfeld theme.
user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

As I was deciding where to go in '73, I scanned Dick's Picks 1 and thought, hmmm, I never listen to this one, why did Dick choose this as numero uno? Solid HCS I know. There are a lot of great WRS now, but this was a novelty at the time. Truckin' I don't recall too well, but how much better could it be than '72? Probably none better. Anyway, I thought I would put on DP 14, then reach out to you guys for DP 1 impressions. And then I saw the postings from kyleharmon and Terrapin Moon with Truckin' and WRS. Maybe I should just listen to it. Alvarhanso, I basically said the same thing you did, I think you might be mixing my comments with Ace Freh...I mean Mind Left Body - awesome picture dude! Where was I - oh - DaP 7 has some highlights in my mind, and better than a ton of 1978 shows, but not as good as DaP 15. Love Donna on Scarlet, love the Fire and the let it burn, and can't think of a song more ruined by Bobby's slide than this FOTM performance. Mind Left Body has the bonie for it, but I have to admit, that's a lot of Gold and Silver on Heady. Some people are bigger fans than me for sure. Mind Left Body - I just googled Ace and can't find that pic - can you hook an Ace fan up?
user picture

Member for

7 years 1 month
Permalink

It's comical that people are arguing that DaP 27 is better than DaP 7. KF, alvahanso, you may prefer DaP 27 and for the sake of making a coherent point, I'll agree with you. But here we are, the three of us in our DaP 27 creek without a paddle (and Space brother with his pom poms cheering us on from land), but all of those people voted for a quarter of the songs on DaP 7. I'd like to say nay, but let's see, we are not talking votes in the 10 or even top 5 lol, it's 1st place, 2nd place, etc. Let's be reasonable gentlemen, we are in the minority. DP36 I don't understand your post. You said the sound isn't the problem, but half of the dissention is being cited for bad sound. And what do you mean when you say DaP 27 is about Brent? Are you saying people aren't truly unsatisfied with the sound but rather with Brent? Please explain. KF, PM me your email, I'll send the pic.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Every fool who ever did blow and made music thought they were a genius at the time, this proves they were not. Almost done with my first and last listen to make sure the discs (made in Mexico) don't skip. Then this piece is going on the shelf behind my bootleg copy of Brent's solo album. Looking forward to some good stuff come the PNW box, Go Hawks.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

6 years 5 months
Permalink

This late summer '83 tour has long been my time capsule Dead. If I could travel back in time and do any single GD tour this would be it. Boise/Sawtooths to Park West/Wasatch to Red Rocks/Rockies to Santa Fe/Sangres camping and road tripping all along the way would have been a real hoot. I have an older cousin who first turned me on to the Dead with tapes, including Boise '83, and he was living in Park City when this tour blew through the Mtn West. He still talks about this tour with reverence, one of his first after leaving MN behind. There's a vid out there of the first set of the band at Park West, and it looks just like shows I still enjoy at State Bridge or Rancho....but with the goddamn Grateful Dead on stage! Phil in particular is a BEAST with his new Modulus and girlfriend front and center. (He devotes at least a couple pages of his autobio to this particular tour and period....the beginning of his renaissance.) Sooo I'm very psyched to have an official release of this one after diving in to another DLP sub despite misgivings. In fact this is my favorite Dave's release of the last few years hands down. Admittedly I'm biased for the aforementioned reasons, but I think the uniqueness and energy of this show standout despite some sound and era limitations. Frankly the peak 70s Dead releases from Dave over and over and over again have started to bore me despite their obvious musicality. I guess I like my Dead a little less predictable and rougher around the edges in order to really highlight the truly inspired moments. Like the Boise Big RxR Blues! My one suggestion for Lemieux on future early-to-mid 80s releases would be to stick to the matrix format of the Fox '80 release. It definitely serves the music and context better than a straight Healy SBD mix, and I know from my own listening that there is no lack of worthy AUD recordings on the LMA and elsewhere that I'm sure any taper would be willing to share for the greater GD good. Cheers to the Citizens of Boise and their Surrender to the Cause!
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

"It's the total lack of cohesiveness, horrible vocal harmonizing, and the guitars sounding like they're on different songs and tempos." And you gave to read Trainwrecked's real time review for a good laugh. I can deal with the sloppy playing since the old flash is in there at least half the time, but I don't get how Brent starts singing on Estimated Prophet or any number of tunes, and there are people who think it sounds good. This just sounds like a band on the ropes to me. I really think Garcia made a mistake inviting this guy into the band. Their harmonies sounded so much better before. I'm no Donna fanboy either, just an objective listener. I thought she was great on the songs she was present for when they wrote them, like Music Never Stoped, Crazy Fingers, Estimated Prophet, Eyes of the World etc, but not so much on the real early songs like St. Stephen, Sugar Magnolia, Wharf Rat, and Ramble on Rose, to name a few. But I have to FF> past Brent's vocals on this show. I was hoping he'd be low enough not to ruin songs for me, and I gave it a half dozen listens. I hope to never get another Brent release as part of my Dave's Picks subscription (fingers crossed). Keep the quality in Dave's Picks and release the 80s on the side, unless there's another tape of the DaP 8 quality, where Brent isn't overwhelming on vocals. If it all sounded like that, I could deal, but that appears to be the rare exception.
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

If I were to rank every Dave's Picks this on would fall around 23 or 24. Having said that, I'm really enjoying it after multiple listens. Of course they're not at their peak here, we knew that going in. And yes, the sound quality is not great and fluctuates throughout. But the playing here really cooks throughout despite the many flubs. But that's what drew me to this band, the willingness to take chances and to go in without a set list and try to create something spontaneous. I'm not old enough to have gone to concerts in the 70s but I'll take this over any concert I saw in 1983 where Ozzy Osbourne or April Wine played the same scripted show night after night. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind here, but, as a Godchaux era fanatic, I'm pleasently surprised by how much i enjoy this one. Maybe some of you would like it more if you didn't compare it to 72-74.
user picture

Member for

16 years 2 months
Permalink

We miss you, Jerry. More than words tell. Today I'm listening to: Jerry Garcia Band Pure Jerry: Bay Area 1978 released: August 31, 2009. Label: Jerry Made JGCD0009 Disc 1 "Mystery Train" (Junior Parker, Sam Phillips) — 8:27 [a] "Catfish John" (Bob McDill, Allen Reynolds) — 9:36 [a] "I Second That Emotion" (Smokey Robinson, Al Cleveland) — 14:02 [b] "Mission in the Rain" (Jerry Garcia, Robert Hunter) – 8:44 [b] "Don't Let Go" (Jesse Stone) — 29:46 [b] Disc 2 "Tore Up Over You" (Hank Ballard) — 9:04 [c] "Simple Twist of Fate" (Bob Dylan) — 10:58 [b] "The Way You Do the Things You Do" (Robinson, Bobby Rogers) — 10:17 [b] "Let Me Roll It" (Paul McCartney) — 11:04 [d] "Gomorrah" (Garcia, Hunter) – 6:26 [d] "I'll Be with Thee" (traditional) – 5:37 [d] "Lonesome and a Long Way from Home" (Delaney Bramlett, Leon Russell) – 23:56 [a] Recording dates and locations: [a] February 18, 1978 – Marin Veterans Memorial Auditorium, San Rafael, California [b] February 19, 1978 – Santa Cruz Civic Auditorium, Santa Cruz, California [c] June 10, 1978 – Keystone, Berkeley, California [d] June 18, 1978 – Keystone, Palo Alto, California Sorry, it's Out Of Print. This recording probably could be found on the secondary markets for a rather hefty price.
user picture

Member for

6 years 9 months
Permalink

devil, good vibes to you. It's refreshing to hear it described as such. I believe the bickering stems from this push and pull against reality. May Jerry's magic twanger reign over Deadville. KF, check out the Big River and Big Railriad Blues from DP 1.
user picture

Member for

10 years 2 months
Permalink

I liked your summing up of DAP27, which I heard for the first time yesterday. When it started, I thought all the negative criticisms were proving to be true. The playing and the sound seemed well below par. But from Big River on, the sound become more consistent and the playing really gels. Either that-or I just get used to it. Things go down hill again with the Help-Slipknot-Franklins jam, unfortunately, but Estimated and Eyes are fine and the jam into drums, led by Brent and Bob is great. Jerry's vocals are a let down throughout, though. On the final cd, Throwing Stones is alright-although I don't actually like the song that much-and Going Down The Road is great. Its a long, long, way from the highs of, say, 1968 or 1972- as rdevil said. But as a snapshot of how they played in 1983 I would think it was pretty good. I'm quite happy with it, anyway.
user picture

Member for

7 years
Permalink

"I really think Garcia made a mistake inviting this guy into the band." Wow. So many things I could say there but I'll let it go. Hopefully you realize the sour backing vocals on Estimated on this release are Jerry and not Brent. Brent is so low in the mix for this chorus you have to strain to find him. It's the high harmony buried deep in there. And on-key.
user picture

Member for

14 years 10 months
Permalink

the version of Poptones on the album is exquisite. drive to the forest in a Japanese car the smell of rubber on country tar hindsight done me no good standing naked in this back of the woods the cassette played Poptones or in my case, Deadtones
user picture

Member for

13 years 6 months
Permalink

...this place has become lately. Not that it matters, but count me on the side that enjoys this pick and am glad to have it. I was concerned with the sound at first... the Wang Dang>Jack Straw does sound odd with the vocals WAY up and the instruments seemingly WAY down, but as others have said here before, Big River through the rest of the 1st set sounds good to these ears, and the band is cooking, (save perhaps on the verses of Minglewood, but the jam is HOT on that one, so I can forgive the lackluster "song" portion... I've got more Minglewoods than I need as it is.) The BEW, RxRBlues, LLRain, and Deal are all top notch performances too... As for Set II, not sure where the hate is coming from in terms of the Help>Slip>Frank. Does Jerry totally botch the lyrics to Help? Yes! Is the rest of the triptych well played? Absolutely! The Slipknot and Franklins are particularly strong. The Estimated>Eyes is strong too, and the patch in Eyes, while jarring, lasts for about 5 seconds... not going to lose sleep on that one. The Jam>Drums>Space is really cool, and like Dave mentioned, the Space on this release is really great. The solo in Throwing Stones? I hear noise, chaos, and craziness, and all of it sounds well placed to me, though not perfect. As a new tune, they were still working out what to do with it, and I think that it's pretty cool to hear the band experiment with Noise Rock like that... can't think of anywhere else they did. Also, isn't that Bobby making all of the noise? Obviously, they didn't think it worked, so the made the Samson-jam part, (something that has always bugged me a bit,) but it is cool to hear where they may have been heading. The rest of the second set is average... Black Peter has been called out as unlistenable by many here who say Jerry's voice sounds terrible... Really? I know it doesn't sound like 71 Jerry, but terrible? Unlistenable? I just don't get it... I think that is what gets me down about the discussion around here lately. So many here clearly have an ax to grind, or some point to prove, on both sides of the coin. What I see more than anything is a bunch of "Deadheads" shitting on the band and more over, shitting on each other. You all know that people have favorite eras, favorite keyboard players, favorite tunes, but rather than let them have that, a lot of you seem so keen to tell them that they are wrong for liking what they like. Get over yourselves. Now that Dave's Picks have made it to #27, this place seems to be more and more toxic... kind of like the lot scene 27 years in. Whatever. I like this pick, you don't. Discussion over. Now, where the hell is that HUGE n'FUNKY Shakedown Street Dave? The past few days, I have really enjoyed the two Alpine 82 shows, 8/7, which was Dick's Picks 32, and yesterday's 8/8 show. Check them both out if you have the chance! (Of course, if you Hate the 80s/Hate Brent/Hate the Grateful Dead, than these are not the droids you seek...) 8/7/82 https://archive.org/details/gd82-08-07.sbd-streeter-wise.unknown.7689.s… Pretty classic show all around... TMNS>Sugaree>TMNS opener! 8/8/82 https://archive.org/details/gd82-08-08.sbd-wise.unknown.7690.sbeok.shnf… Good 1st set, Very strong 2nd Set with Scarlet>Fire, Estimated, Other One... The Double Encore of Satisfaction and Brokedown is perhaps the highlight for me... check out Bobby dropping Wang Dang Doodle for the (1st time?) in the middle of Satisfaction. Cool stuff! Shouting in the wind, Peace
user picture

Member for

13 years 6 months
Permalink

We all lost Jerry 23 years ago today. RIP good sir, and thanks for all of the joy you gave to so many. Is it a coincidence that there are no GD shows from 8/9? Peace
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....lets try something new. Can we all agree that '76 Cosmic Charlie's are awesome? I'll start. '76 Cosmic Charlie's are awesome.
user picture

Member for

13 years 6 months
Permalink

76 Cosmic Charlie's are totally awesome! My favorite of all the Cosmic Charlie's! Headed to Merriweather to see the boys this weekend, then up to Watkins Glen for Curveball... I doubt you're coming east for either, but maybe you'll see me on the webcast! BTW - I have heard there is a free webcast of Friday night's show at Walnut Creek! This may be the link for it right here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kcoOF7_mfU Peace
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

On this day, like all of you, I reflect on the events 23 years ago. The reality of it is still a little hard to handle for me sometimes. This time around, I have come to this realization that my generation (or age group might be more appropriate) was likely one of the last if not the last to ever see Jerry play. I have talked before about my own personal experiences of getting on the bus in 92, to get see a few shows, and then only to have it end all too suddenly . I have also talked about what I think is a common feeling for everyone of these importance of all of the shows that were recorded. These recordings are the next best thing to being at the show. I know that being at the show is different and is the ultimate best thing about the Dead. The experience is “it" , but the reality is that experience only happens once. After it is done those that attended any given show have the memories - which by the way I greatly appreciate when these memories are shared. Please keep that going when appropriate/needed! However after that the only thing that is left are these recordings which gives all a chance to hear the band go at it. The other reality of this is we all know that the number of shows in vault is vast, with variety being the key. I think DaP 27 is good release, certainly not perfect. When i look at how many shows have been released The Dead, Rhino, and Dave L & Co. have been generous. When I look at Deadbase 50 and I see the lists of favorite tapes, a lot of them have been officially released. I know there is more to come. We have also got some releases that were sleepers or maybe lacking in some aspects. The reality is that with the volume of releases that have been produced there will be some that just aren't to the level as many others. Of course everyone will have different opinions on this but it is bound to happen. It looks DaP 27 is one of them. In the end I have yet to discover a show that I hated. With sound quality, performance, and completeness being variables I feel I am lucky to be able to own any of these shows with the 9/2/83 show being one of them. I will say this though, if I was approached by the good Doctor with a Tardis or Marty and Doc in a Delorean and I was told this: “You can go back in time to attend 3 Grateful Dead shows but you can't choose them. The shows are 4/24/78, 12/9/81, and 9/2/83. Do you want to go?” Without hesitation I would say “Hell Yeah!” I say this all of the time but I appreciate all of you regardless of show/era preference. If it wasn't for these comment pages I wouldn't have anyone to talk about this with.
user picture

Member for

8 years
Permalink

'76 Cosmic Charlie's are bad.............but in a good way (did I fool you for a second?)
user picture

Member for

13 years 6 months
Permalink

Dude! This show is great! Thanks for the recommendation! I have been working from home on an online course for work the past few days, so I have had the pleasure of being able to dig deep into the archives, and this one is hitting that sweet spot right now! That is one hell of a Shakedown opener, the Bird Song is nice and exploratory, Sweet Peggy-O... the band does sound great! Thanks again for the tip :) Peace
user picture

Member for

15 years 2 months
Permalink

I noticed a general dislike for DaP 4, is it for sound quality or performance? I've always liked this show, the 2nd set jam is great!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 6 months
Permalink

Big fan of the 76 versions of Cosmic Charlie. In fact lately I've been listening to the second set of 7/16/76 (the complete set, not the one that was released as a DaP 18 bonus). Man I love that jam...one of my favorites of the whole year. The dead offer something for everyone - that's one of the reasons I love them and that's why I collect everything that comes out (more or less). I have learned that even if I'm not in the mood for a particular release on the day it comes out, doesn't mean I won't want to binge on it down the road. I'm working from home today too and very caffeinated. Will check out that 84 show now. RIP Jerry - was always a blast
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

4 - 080sfan. I listened to the same bonus disc last night while prepping dinner with the wife. Her favorite year is '76. No need to twist my arm....
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

But It's a fact. Verifiable. If every day was sunny, how would you know that it's beautiful?? If all food tasted the same, how would you know what is good & what is bad?? If every day was 26 degrees, how would you know what a bikini looks like?? If every Dead show was a 10, how could you appreciate it's greatness?? The answer is, you could not. You have to have the proverbial yin/yang or else you would not be able to differentiate one from the other. So if for no other reason, appreciate the less than stellar shows, they help you know when you are truly listening to a gem!!
user picture

Member for

11 years 4 months
Permalink

'76 Cosmic Charlie's are hyp-no-tic...... thanks for the tickle - been a while - I really should check that out tonight.... gratefulhan - Glad you got on the bus in time to see Jerry. There was something about being in the same room with him that the uninitiated will never know. Agreed that all the releases are generally great. Its easy to nitpick, but Dave & Co DO know what they are doing despite all the second-guessing.... at the end of the day, we get more and more great shows. Glorious.
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

Wait a MINUTE....to be "initiated" into the dead family you had to have been in the same room as Jerry at a concert? Uh-oh, our numbers are gonna drop significantly in the next 15-20 years, ouch! My kids won't be happy about this. And are we talking 26 degrees Fahrenheit or Celsius? Cause if you dont specify the scale, we could be in bikinis all day...but, I'd have to shave my chest first. 76 Cosmic Charlies can be quite fun, the one from the Orpheum release is very nice and the 76 Dicks release with the Autumn looking cover, whichever one that was. I'm gonna go give another listen to the Winterland '73 Bonus disc 12/4/73 and Dave's 2012 bonus 7/29/74 those have a been wonderful rediscovery the last few days.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Finished DaP 27 and was very disappointed. Its definitely a cellar dweller for me in the series. 83 is my favorite year in the Brent era though this show had escaped my attention. I agree with all the comments posted about how uneven the audio quality is in the first set. By the time the sound is enjoyable we are up to Big RR. I agree that song smoked, and Deal was nice and long. The second set was classic 83, which is good, but Help was a hot mess and the cut in Eyes was killer. Overall, I might go back to that second set, but there are so many better shows in fall 83 that i'm just not sure when. I am concerned we might not get any more 83 official releases given Dave's comments about recording quality/availability and the indication that if this is the best out there, we might be in serious trouble. FYI - for relief, listened to 10/14/77 afterward. ahh.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Hi - has everyone in the U.K. got their copy yet? Waiting patiently here in Nottingham.....
user picture

Member for

10 years 10 months
Permalink

Where we disagreed was I think DaP 7 is I took issue with the idea that 4/24 is better than most '78 shows. Granted, my knowledge of '78 is limited to the official releases and I had a couple of decent non-officials (3 of which are now officially released in 1/22, 7/7-8) back when I was collecting as much as I could get, and still physically trading tapes and cds. But I will take DaP 15, DaP 23, DP 25's 2 shows (one Bear one Betty), July box (esp 7/1 and 7/8), and the 30 Trips (the show before or after DP 25) over DaP 7 any day of the week. I like the Rupp Arena show that would have been the third of the mini-box before they put DaP 7 out over Normal, too. That was the bottom of my DaP personal rankings before 20 and 27. Also, I was really joking about the disagreement line, mainly because Space and I rarely seem to see eye to eye on releases, and you and I are usually more on the same page. Probably the inner Who freak. And I add 4 in there, too not for performnce necessarily, but because it just does nothing for me. I've listened to the full show probably 3 times, and Playing> Supplication> Playing a couple other times, and it doesn't move me. (I know that wasn't your question KF, but I saw it as I was catching up on the conversation, so thought I'd answer why that one is lowly ranked in my own case.) It's not an anti-'76 thing, either, I really like some of the '76 stuff, it has more space to it, more groove than other years. That particular show, and the DP from the night after would not be put on my stereo by my choice if I wanted '76. RT 4.5 would be my go to, DaP 18 next for officials, 8/4/76 for just a '76 show. To That's Otis, it's very funny that you bemoan the toxicity of the debate and seeming unwillingness of others to compromise/hear each other out, then you literally say "Discussion over." Was that irony? I just don't think someone has to have an ax to grind not to like a particular show. Sure, it probably sours other people to read a really damning review, but we can only hear things with our own ears and not somebody else's. I wish I could hear DaP 27 the same way Space does, but the fact I can't doesn't harm your enjoyment, nor his, and this seems to be the appropriate forum for that discussion. If you were being ironic, my apologies for taking it seriously.
user picture

Member for

14 years 10 months
Permalink

this whole release is a major experiment like the "what color is the dress" and "what does the voice say".
user picture

Member for

14 years 10 months
Permalink

it's "inner Doors freak" because they are much better than the Who ;)
user picture

Member for

10 years 2 months
Permalink

Mine arrived here in sunny Lowestoft on Wednesday. Hopefully yours will arrive any day now.
product sku
081227931599