• 1,815 replies
    heatherlew
    Default Avatar
    Joined:

    "The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

    And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

    Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

    *Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • kyleharmon
    Joined:
    i never played A Link to the
    i never played A Link to the Past and I never knew who Bruce Cockburn was and somehow when my life flashes before me I wont be thinking I wasted my life because of it
  • Thin
    Joined:
    couple reactions:
    "The blues started with field workers on farms who got it from gospel and African roots". Seriously??? Thank you HendrixFreak for the correction - holy moly, how far can we disassociate the musical contributions of slaves? Let's give then credit... I think they earned it, no? Mononhahela regarding your 1980 dilemma... stay loud on the topic until your miracle appears. Unless you're dying for the actual article, in which case go ahead and spend the $40 (but that's a lot of money). Sixtus re: 2/15/73 Dark Star.. the accessible melodic ones are my favs. Thanks for the signpost. I believe the Wembley 4/7 or 8/72 Dark Star is also very melodic.... love that one. Anybody notice something different????
  • simonrob
    Joined:
    Labels...
    Now it is plain for all to see the problems that arise from trying to label different types of music. So whatever happened to country rock, for instance. Were the Beatles rock'n'roll? Who cares. Daverock, your ignorance of who Bruce Cockburn is, is indeed inexcusable. To put another pointless label on him, he could be called the Canadian Bob Dylan, but then again...
  • daverock
    Joined:
    Bob Dylan Mr Heartbreak....Bruce Cockburn?
    Yes, I'd go along with what you say about his Bobness. To me, he raised the bar lyrically in the same way Hendrix did instrumentally. Maybe people who would otherwise never have considered setting their poems to music did so as a result of Dylan. This wasn't always a good thing, mind you.Incidentally, excuse my ignorance...but who's Bruce Cockburn?
  • highstrikerjay
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    1983
    In anticipation of 09/02/83, I've been listening to some other well regarded fall '83 shows today, notably 09/06/83 and 10/11/83. If 09/02/83 is cut from the same cloth, it will be a solid pick. Totally digging those other 83 shows (as I do the other official releases from '83 - 10/14 and 10/21). Next up while I wait for DaP 27, I think I'll spin 10/17/83. Don't compare '83 to shows from '67 to '79, just enjoy them for what they are. Also perhaps not as cleanly played or recorded as '87-'89, but more crispy in between song jams in '83 IMO than in those later years. Bless the digital archives!!
  • kyleharmon
    Joined:
    for you, Orosbouros
  • Dark-Star
    Joined:
    Semantic tangeant
    Rock music, pop music, Prog music blah blah blah. The point that was being made is that our generation and our parents generation were around for the invention of rock pop Prog whatever you want to call it music. it's not classical it's not baroque,it's not rap. We were around when the artists were alive and their records were being made and our parents played their records and we played their records. In 200 years there may not be anything that sounds even remotely like this, yet we were here to see live concerts of it. In 200 years they will most likely look back on the Beatles And The Rolling Stones and Elvis and say wow to have been alive when all of that was happening, all of that great music. Nobody's trying to identify when the first rock record was made. A point was made that the elements that came together to make modern rock and roll were a perfect storm that will never happen again, and WE got to live to see it. And to say The Beatles weren't a rock band, well by that logic I could listen to Dead Flowers by the Stones and say they're not a rock band. Or I could listen to the Song is Over by The Who and say that's easy listening. Or I could listen to That's the Way by Led Zeppelin and say they're not rock they're folk. I'm starting to hear hairs being split just to split hairs. We got to see all of these people while they were alive that's the point. And the styles they developed will never be redone again because all of the things that went into making it are already done. It was clearly stated that the Beatles brought it to the world and they did. It was never said that they did it without anyone's influence. Mind left body I thought you made a good point. Birth is bringing it to the world which is what the Beatles did and continued to do until their breakup. It's nonsense to attribute the explosion of pop / rock music to anyone other than the Beatles. Without the Beatles it would have all remained esoteric. And yes other bands picked up where they left off and carried the torch. The Beatles brought it to the world. And to be honest I don't even like the Beatles that much. The White Album should have been cut in half, and the first five albums I'm mostly throwaways and are summed up in the one red greatest hits album. Sergeant Pepper Magical Mystery Tour and Abbey Road are pretty good. My point is I don't even like him that much but I know what their role was in the birth of rock and roll music.
  • Mr_Heartbreak
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Changing the Course of Rock History
    Interesting discussion of rock history, but I think everyone here is forgetting the man who changed the course of music forever: Mr. Robert Zimmerman, aka, Bob Dylan. He turned on the Beatles. Before Dylan, they were "She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah." After Dylan, they began to see song lyrics as poetry, an art form. Jimi Hendrix? Same thing. Look at the covers: Like A Rolling Stone, arguably the most important song in rock history; All Along the Watchtower; Drifters' Escape. etc, etc. The Dead? Don't even get me started. Without Dylan, Robert Hunter and Jerry Garcia never would have gone beyond playing some old folk and bluegrass tunes together. Look at the covers with them, too: they were covering It's All Over Now Baby Blue when they were still playing tiny venues in 1966. Meanwhile, Dylan was conquering Europe on a mass scale. Dylan pushed everyone: the Stones, the Byrds, the Doors. Without Dylan's massive influence, going back as far as '63, songs played on the radio - rock and pop alike - would always have remained boy/girl love songs and cheesy pop. Without Dylan, we never would have had the Dead as we know them, or the Beatles (beyond the first couple albums), Bruce Cockburn, Hendrix, or any form of prog rock. Dylan is The Godfather of all modern music that has lyrics with any depth whatsoever.
  • daverock
    Joined:
    Rock n' roll
    Some great views expressed on here on this subject. I love The Beatles, and there is no question that they started life as a rock n' roll group. And that they periodically revisited it to great effect-especially on "The Beatles For Sale". But the music that they will be remembered for is not, to me, rock n' roll-or rock. It is pop music. That isn't a bad thing-but its what it is. No way hozay is "Sergeant Pepper" rock n' roll. Actually there is more of a case for claiming that The Beatles invented prog rock than rock n' roll. Finer men than me have tried to identify the first rock n' roll record. But for what its worth, Robert Johnson definitely played with more rhythm than earlier country bluesman. Fast forward to 1948, and we have John Lee Hooker and Muddy Waters playing electric guitars with a much heavier beat. Any of these artists could be credited with starting rock-but its probably Elvis Presley and Chuck Berry, both seemingly independently of each other, mixing country with blues to create what is known as rock n' roll today. After the pop of the early 60s, the man who really invented "rock" as we know it today, and as distinct from "rock n 'roll" was surely Jimi Hendrix. He brought his blues and soul chops to London in 1966, added the volume and power chords associated with Pete Townsend, the craziness of Jeff Beck, wrapped it all up in ball and kicked it out of the park. A far greater influence than The Beatles-every band I saw in the 70s owed something to him. There is surely room for ongoing development, too. Rock n' roll is a hybrid of earlier musical forms, from different cultures, combined together to create something new. Its a great blueprint for the future.
  • Mind-Left-Body
    Joined:
    KF completely on target
    What I took from Keith fan's essay is that the Beatles did not invent the first rock and roll song, they took all of the primal elements that define today's rock and roll from various sources and put them together into one whole and brought music that had rock elements from an esoteric underground entity to a worldwide industry. While you all make good points about the history of rock in general, I don't believe that Keith fan means to say none of that is true, only that it was the precursor to what has become today's rock and roll music. The rock music of the 60s and 70s and 80s and 90s is molded after the Beatles and their contemporaries like the Rolling Stones and The Kinks and The Who and many others, not Elvis not Jerry Lee Lewis not Bill Haley, not anything before the Beatles. What I see in some of the counterpoints being raised here are people missing points in the original article. For example someone might respond to my comments by saying lots of musicians were influenced by Elvis so how can I say that modern music wasn't in part due to Elvis's career? The answer is, that's not what I'm saying. I am saying that modern music doesn't take on the arrangement and style of Elvis, it takes on that of The Beatles and their contemporaries. And the contemporaries that I mentioned worked off of The Beatles and took their lead from the Beatles and then added their own elements. The artists before the Beatles that some people mentioned, collectively produced elements that the Beatles then unified and brought pop sensibility to. This brought about a seismic shift in the way the bands that were the Beatles contemporaries approached music. In the late 60s and early 70s they all fed off of each other, but it started with the Beatles. And those other bands contributed to the continued development, such as the Rolling Stones, The Who, Led Zeppelin The Grateful Dead Etc. The Beatles were the birth of rock and roll. They did not write the first rock song, they put the puzzle together and industrialized it. In doing that, there was a birth. Nobody is wrong here in any of the smaller points they've made about the significant contributions of some artists who came before The Beatles. The over arching main point though is that the Beatles brought it all together and introduced it to the world. The embryo analogy was spot-on. In its simplest manifestation you could say that without the Beatles there would be no Rolling Stones or Who or Zeppelin as we know them today. If they were to exist at all, meaning if they were able to even break out of the underground, the Stones would sound like their first record which was all R&B covers, Led Zeppelin 1 would all sound like you shook me and I can't quit you baby, and The Who would all be like shout and shimmy and I'm a man. Rock music as we know it today would not sound as it does today without the Beatles. But if you take away any one single other group that was mentioned pre-beatles, The Beatles would still have been the Beatles. I'll stop rambling now. I just have always connected with what Keith fan said here but I can't say it as eloquently. And then I saw some responses that didn't seem to get the point. I mean everyone's disputing the term birth. Birth is not the invention of something. Birth is to bring something to the world. The Beatles didnt invent rock, they brought rock to the world (and with a genetic makeup that was all their own). That's what I took from Keith fans original comment when he said we witnessed the birth of rock and roll. That we did. We didn't witness the conception of rock and roll we witness the birth. That's what I took Keith fan correct me if I'm wrong.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

8 years

"The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

*Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

fuck yes shirdeep!! poptones...poptones...poptones….poptones...poptones
user picture

Member for

13 years 5 months
Permalink

Nothing left to do but smile, smile smile :) To quote another of my favorite bands, "It doesn't matter - overrated." Happy Thirsty Thursday, DeadLand! Peace
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

both Santa Fe shows in 83 would be a nice lil' box set
user picture

Member for

9 years
Permalink

Cosmic Charlie, 6-14-76 Man, I’ve asked Dave numerous times for 6-14-76. DaP 28 would be a good time to release it. So, Jerry arrives at heaven’s gates and god says...... Well, I’m not the joke teller here, Vguy is. Fill in the blanks Vguy...... 30 years of GOGD!!!!!!!!!!!!
user picture

Member for

13 years 4 months
Permalink

I think the unevenness of the recording is what gets most of the bite. I think it's an interesting show and a unique setlist. I enjoy it if for no other reason (besides is a pretty good show) that it is truly unique and quirky. Much sounds like most of us, and what's not to like about unique and quirky.
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

I know which one is Brent. There is nothing you can say about his voice that's going to make me like it. I bought RFK 89, I bought Dead set, I downloaded Dave's Picks 8, and I bought Crimson White and Indigo. I still don't like his voice, it's cringeworthy to me (and many others I might add). He ruins every song he opens his mouth on for me. It sounds strained, harsh, and abrasive. I'm not alone in my dislike of his voice. People post about it all the time on all sorts of dead forums. If you like it great, enjoy. Sorry man.
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

three unusual things today: Doing my Ubereats thing. I got honked at by a bus driver. and some of the nastiest, most potent anger ever in my life seized me. I screamed profanities about coitus at him and showed him how to "count to one". It was like a stroke or something. BAM! not my finest moment on this earth. really, I lost my ish. a potential ant invasion. a few in the house. found the trail outside, and wreaked havoc on the little creeps with a can of Raid. I felt like I was in Apocalypse Now, with Kilgore's crew. mini-split/air cooler started leaking water. WTF!!?? I think I got it fixed, but that never happened before.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

11 years 3 months
Permalink

I'm always a little amused, if not confounded, by the number of people who want to tell others they can't make comparisons. I got on the bus in 1982, and I can remember people referring to Brent as "new guy." Yes, that's right, you heard right, in those pre-internet days, not everyone had a subscription to Relix, and Deadheads would show up for a show or a tour and all they would know was that Keith and Donna were gone, and there was a new guy. "Not sure what his name is. Brent or something." And guess what? In that early 80s era, plenty of Deadheads were already complaining that the band wasn't as good as they were in the 70s. The phrase "disco Dead" was not a compliment. It was a sarcastic commentary on the late 70s Dancin' and on Shakedown, for one. And haven't almost all of us said some variation of the following statements? "The Dead kind of suck in the studio. Their live shows are much better. That's really where they shine." In other words, every studio album got compared, unfavorably, to live shows. Every. Single. One. And I LOVE some of those studio albums! People compare things to other things. It's human nature. It's what we do. Yet here we are in 2018, more than 20 years after Jerry died, and self-appointed "Directors" come along to say, "Oh, you can't compare Official Grateful Dead Release A with Official Grateful Dead Release B, because one was recorded on two-track, and the other is a MULTI-track." Oh. Okay. I see. Almost as bad are the "it's all good" dude-bros, who grin like Tommy Chong while they type, "Heeeyyyyy, maaaaaan, it's all good. Every Grateful Dead show was beautiful. There's no such thing as a bad show, man." Uh, no. The Dead were horribly inconsistent, as every Deadhead who's honest with him- or herself knows. Lots of drugs were ingested. Lots of instruments went out of tune. Sometimes Jerry practically nodded out on his mike. I personally know someone who was at a show where ol' Jer apparently shat himself and ran offstage to avoid it being seen by the entire crowd. It got ugly. That's why some of us love it when it's so great. When they were all in sync, listening to each other, they got into a flow where they played beyond their own powers. They made magic. Those moments of magic are what I love. We all own some of them on recordings...maybe a lot of them. And we seek more. That's why some of us are disappointed when we BUY a product that seemingly contains few of them, with lots and lots of fuckups all throughout it, like this DaP27 show. The "it's all good" argument reminds me of Dylan's song: "I'll pluck off your beard and blow it in your face This time tomorrow I'll be rolling in your place I wouldn't change a thing even if I could You know what they say, they say: it's all good." Happy Jerry week. The guy was far from perfect. He made lots and lots of mistakes, musically and otherwise. Yet he remains one of my favorite musicians of all time. I can love the guy and still be aware of and actually comment on his flaws. But I'll never understand the people who have their heads so far up his ass they can smell patchouli.
user picture

Member for

7 years 8 months
Permalink

I prefer Keith to Brent because I love acoustic piano, and I feel the 1970s were the band's peak musically. But I listen to it all. That last RFK box grew on me. The fact is, Keith was all used up by the time he and Donna left the band. He would have needed a rehab or some kind of re-boot to get energy back into his playing and the band. Brent certainly didn't lack energy! His vocals are distinctive and when he over-emoted they could be abrasive. But shit, some nights his enthusiasm really kind of elevated and helped carry the band. There are cringe worthy moments as there were with Donna, but not always. His keys and synths sure as hell moved these guys into another era, Brent adding more and more as Jerry diminished. There isn't one guitar solo from the 80s onward that matched anything on the E72 tour. Yes, there was great stuff, but Jerry the guitarist incorporated more and more effects and then MIDI into his playing. The Jeff Beck-like magic in his fingertips was blurred out and lost, gone forever. Look, I'm not saying he sucked - he had so much talent and fretboard knowledge he could half-ass it and sound great. As he did, many nights, well into the 1990s. I love Jerry but I understand the patchouli comments. You know, bad body odor is not made any better by a wash of patchouli over it. You're kidding yourself. If anything it adds to the pungency. No one but G.G. Allin would walk around with blood, semen and shit smeared across them in public. That is vile. Be hairy, be a freak, but for God's sake wash yourself. Brush and floss; do not have bad breath as a dog. Most of us have advanced past the dark ages.
user picture

Member for

13 years 5 months
Permalink

I haven't been keeping up. I'm still immersed in the 30 Trips box, if you can believe that. I happen to be around mid-80s right now, and I'm marveling at the quality of those shows. So imagine my surprise that DaP 27 is not anywhere near the unexpected glory of the ones selected for the big box. Dave's cheerleading aside, does anyone really think that DaP 27 is worthy? I tried to like "Help on the Way" (because I almost always love it) and Jerry mangles every single verse. And the first set is so lame. There are moments, as always, but it is not even a "solid" show compared to many, many others. I'm not a Brent hater (except for "I Will Take You Home" and maybe his goofy verse in "Red Rooster"). Are there really so few great performances/recordings from the 80s? Rhino doesn't care - it sold out anyway. I'm not looking forward to my DaP subscription getting watered down by shows like this one.
user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

phil said jerry's hygiene went south in the 80's before the first intervention.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

11 years 3 months
Permalink

I probably should have written "...so far up his ass they can taste Häagen-Dazs." I was thinking of Junior Soprano: "Federal Marshals so far up my ass, I can taste Brylcreem." Seemed a little harsh, so I went for a different sense.
user picture

Member for

13 years 4 months
Permalink

But you could probably say the same thing about the Grateful Dead. I've been thinking about perspective when reading all the back and forth about this release, but I need to at least give this an attentive listen before I comment. The GD were a big tent band, I always thought there was plenty of room for comments that differ from our own. There's certainly no wrong or right so long as some fun and enjoyment comes of it. The GD was all about a grand and shared adventure.. 83 was certainly an adventure.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....like talking of Jerry's demons. Me? I'm playing a random Grateful Dead show. I'm sure it will be good, if not grate. My inbox is wide open btw.
user picture

Member for

13 years 4 months
Permalink

What's the show and how random was this selection?
user picture

Member for

11 years 2 months
Permalink

check your PM
user picture

Member for

12 years 1 month
Permalink

What's the deal with banging on the guy, especially today. Some of these discussions are worse than the release itself.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....plinky keys and all. What were they thinking? Lololol. Oops. "Bob restarted a verse by accident. Dammit!" See how silly that sounds? I love warts. Whatcha all spinning this August 9th? Cause I know you are or you aren't a "real" Deadhead. /s
user picture

Member for

11 years 2 months
Permalink

I'm listening to Freedom Hall 6-15-93. ...biggest memory from this one was dancing to Gloria in one of the portals to the 2nd level seats with a guy from one of the food venders there. White pants,white shirt,white apron,white hot dog hat and all. Danced his ass off in pure joy. Lots of fun. ...Shriners in little cars & acid DO mix... :o)
user picture

Member for

13 years 4 months
Permalink

That's exactly the point I have been trying to raise with my therapist.. for years.. We are not crazy.. Tomorrow I am marching down to the DMV and demanding my license be renewed. I didn't have it in my listen to a full show other than the three I listened to on the drive here today. I might give some of the unreleased late stuff a spin. Whiskey in the Jar, So Many Roads, Visions is great. One or two on YouTube, and I will enter the land of the horizontal warriors plotting strategy on the DMV tomorrow. Not only should they invoke my right to drive little cars while wearing tiny hats, I want a class D license for good measure. Speaking of driving tiny cars on acid, anyone ever spent a day at the DMV dosed? Flash, flash 100 yard dash what do you make of all these bats?
user picture

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

I wondered, as I listened to this release, why I smelled patchouli and tasted Haagen Daz? Now I know. Really, it has pros, it has cons, it's not so bad, it's not great, but I enjoyed it just the same. How embarrassed I now feel, that I enjoyed this release for what it was, now that I know I could have been brooding instead and bemoaning what it is not.
user picture

Member for

14 years 11 months
Permalink

It's Jerry Garcia Tribute Night at the SF Giants game this evening. Can't believe this was 25 years ago: Now THAT'S how you do it!
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

that video has me laughing really hard thank you
user picture

Member for

9 years 5 months
Permalink

a tale of the tapes. according to Deadbase, there are 2314 shows, of those there are 450+ Pigpen shows, 403 Keith shows, 810 Brent shows and 378 Vince shows. of the Brent shows almost 700 are cassettes/PCMs recorded by Dan Healy from the PA SBD to check out how Dan's mix sounded, not ever considered for release. The Keith shows were recorded reel to reel from a separate mixing console from the PA and the Betty Boards were mixed on headphones and in no way match what was heard in the hall. don't believe me try an AUD tape for the same show, try a different AUD tape if there is one. these 70s Reel to Reels were also never considered for release. they were for band reference and they had enough of a budget they didn't have to reuse them, like some of the Radio City multi track show tapes that got recycled by Arista after Dead Set & Reckoning came out. aside from 100 or so special events that were recorded on multi track for eventual release that made it into the Vault, everything else is 2 tracks mixed for reference listening, Betty's, FM broadcasts or to hear how the live mix sounded compared to the sound in the hall. the cost of the Plangent process, (analog to digital transfer), precludes them using it on most Dave's Picks because it is cost prohibitive and will probably only be used in box sets from now on. Dave's Picks are not worth the expense or time to Plangent, so instead we get Jeffery Norman magic to try and make it sound as good as possible from the in house master tape digitization. which means releasing the returned Betty's as Dave's picks is denying the chance for future Plangent processing, the good Betty's will be held for the annual box sets as the multi tracks have been already milked for most of what's available. more fall 89 multi tracks anyone? then there's the Bear audio journals, which are basically 2 track mono recordings with the amplified instruments in one channel and the PA (drums, vocals and keyboard) in the other. if you want to make the pre 1969 stuff sound really good, listen to it in mono with the vocals centered and the instruments on top of each other and not next to each other. you are not losing anything as the Bear tapes have no real stereo separation, he was hearing impaired in one ear and couldn't hear stereo. this leaves about 1600 possible shows on stereo tapes of which less than 500 are Reel to Reel and the rest cassette and digital tapes. this means whats left for Dave's choices are mostly cassette SBDs from the PA or he's eating into the potential for future box sets. maybe this means less people will subscribe in the future and there will be more of a chance for the average fan to get a copy of a show he wants ala carte, is that a bad thing? maybe Rhino plans to start allowing digital downloads, but without the budget for Normanization or packaging at $20 a show to start making some profit on the rest of the vault? difficult to believe, as since the bankruptcy of Music Today all previous digital downloads are still unavailable and Warner Music, the new distribution for Dead.net, only has digital downloads for the new releases. from the Spring 90 TOO page Digital Download Digital downloads have been temporarily disabled while we work on resolving the technical issues. Previous purchasers will be notified when the problem is resolved. the first 15 years of the GD the band played mostly small halls to limited audiences, with the large festival exceptions. the 2nd 15 years the band became one of the top selling live acts, for most of the last 10 years they were in football stadiums and huge arenas, so the potential of "i was there" buyers is far greater than the early years. it is very likely more people saw the band with Brent or Vince than the combined years for Pigpen and Keith. it is inevitable that Dave's Picks start mining the last 15 years and now seems as good a time as any. the new licensing deal with Rhino still has 8 years left to prepare releases from whats in the vault. if getting a Brent show is that distasteful to you, maybe you shouldn't get a subscription and try for the left overs of the era you like when they go on sale, instead of insulting the people that went to and enjoyed the shows that were poorly recorded with no intention of being used for a release.
user picture

Member for

16 years 2 months
Permalink

Jerry Garcia, Bob Weir, & Vince Welnick singing The Star Spangled Banner - the US National Anthem, on April 12, 1993 for the San Francisco Giants home opener, is my favorite rendition by a popular music group or individual singer. It surpasses Whitney Houston's 1991 performance in my opinion. Thank you very much for posting this, Bolo24. Thank you. Yep, we ALL miss Jerry.
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

This collection of Garcia guest-spots was put together by Jambase, there's some nice stuff in here if anyone's interested, sorry if it's been posted already. On the song "Barren Ground" the way Bruce and Jerry look at each other is truly one of equal admiration and family. It's unfortunate that Bruce couldn't have made his solo career and his permanent membership in the dead work out. Now, that could've been something...special. Take a break and come back with the new album, Hornsby, less pressure on the band and a reduced touring schedule. One can dream right?! https://www.jambase.com/article/remembering-jerry-garcia-live-guest-app…
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years 11 months
Permalink

This my least favorite show so far. The sound is ok but the playing just seems mediocre and the singing is just bad. I subscribe each year and most of the shows are great, this just isn't one of them.
user picture

Member for

13 years 11 months
Permalink

Thanks for that link direwulf. Lots of that was new to me. Loved that pre-LaBamba jam! Yes, Jerry looked so happy and healthy with Bruce. That was about the time he was making those great recordings with Grisman, too.
user picture

Member for

7 years 3 months
Permalink

Jim, I have spent a day dosed at the DMV, then again, I work there so...... P.S. direwulf gets it-as a 'merican, I forgot that most other countries use celsius as a scale. I thought that's what made us great......again. Thanks for the bikini chuckle P.P.S. stoltzie gets it too-I almost always get a chuckle from you. Thanks!! We'll never know what's good, if we don't have bad to compare it to.
user picture

Member for

6 years 6 months
Permalink

phish will be doing another free webcast tonite at 7pm Eastern Time. Livephish.com has details
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

...."Do you remember the first time we had sex together over fifty years ago? We went behind the village tavern where you leaned against the back fence and I made love to you." Yes, she says, "I remember it well." OK, he says, "How about taking a stroll around there again and we can do it for old time's sake?" "Oh Jim, you old devil, that sounds like a crazy, but good idea!" A police officer sitting in the next booth heard their conversation and, having a chuckle to himself, he thinks to himself, I've got to see these two old-timers having sex against a fence. I'll just keep an eye on them so there's no trouble. So he follows them. The elderly couple walks haltingly along, leaning on each other for support aided by walking sticks. Finally, they get to the back of the tavern and make their way to the fence The old lady lifts her skirt and the old man drops his trousers. As she leans against the fence, the old man moves in.. Then suddenly they erupt into the most furious sex that the policeman has ever seen. This goes on for about ten minutes while both are making loud noises and moaning and screaming. Finally, they both collapse, panting on the ground. The policeman is amazed. He thinks he has learned something about life and old age that he didn't know. After about half an hour of lying on the ground recovering, the old couple struggle to their feet and put their clothes back on. The policeman, is still watching and thinks to himself, this is truly amazing, I've got to ask them what their secret is. So, as the couple passes, he says to them, "Excuse me, but that was something else. You must've had a fantastic sex life together. Is there some sort of secret to this?" Shaking, the old man is barely able to reply, "Fifty years ago that wasn't an electric fence."
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

worth a listen
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

thasscrayzee
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

now, back to the 80s with 10/17/82 Mississippi > Franklin's :)))
user picture

Member for

6 years 2 months
Permalink

All of the Dave's Picks 15 talk made me put it on. Great show, great audio. The Estimated Prophet is perfect in every way. I'm not a big fan of the fast Eyes of the World, but I forced myself to listen to this one and it's good for a fast one. Stoltzfus, you are correct. I will put that June '74 show on next. I have not listened to the WRS / Jam in a long time. Or the Eyes of the Word. Or the mad mad mad China Cat. I did recently play its neighbor, Road Trips, Wall of Sound. Now that's a great tape. I think it's one of the better sounding 1974 issues. Jerry is nice and clear. So is Keith for that matter. I would have been good with both shows released in full. Same with Dick's Picks 12.
user picture

Member for

14 years 9 months
Permalink

we've listed _previous_ fivesixwhatever coming up list: 10/17/82 rest of show 10/11/83 11/19/72 disc three DaP 2 (7/31/74) DaP 27 (you know) 12/28/79 L&G the GD somewhere in there or eventually Adam and the Ants: Kings of the Wild Frontier Melvins: Tres Cabrones Sleep: Dopesmoker Motorhead of some kind
product sku
081227931599