• 1,815 replies
    heatherlew
    Default Avatar
    Joined:

    "The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

    And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

    Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

    *Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • garciaddicted
    Joined:
    Rock 'N' Roll
    If you tried to give rock and roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'- John Lennon
  • hendrixfreak
    Joined:
    You must be kidding....
    "The blues started with field workers on farms who got it from gospel and African roots." Field workers on farms? That's got to be satire, because you've got to be kidding. The blues developed out of field chants -- yes, of African origins -- by slaves on plantations who were systemically murdered, lynched, starved and beaten by armed guards and who were bought and sold as sub-human property. And that went on from the 1600s well into the 1950s, perhaps later. Fixed it for ya.
  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    Blues
    Think I’d call the blues more like the Gleam in RR daddy’s eye, the weight in his preverbal sack if you will... than the birth...but unquestionably a major genetic element...
  • SPACEBROTHER
    Joined:
    Birth of rock and roll
    Started with the blues. The blues started with field workers on farms who got it from gospel and African roots.
  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    Kyle: “are you guys from 1969”
    Nope, 1962, buda da ba bop boom, heyyyyI do recall this thing called pong my cousins had? Probably turned me off of games for life; ) Hell, we didn’t get cable till the late 70s...color tv was out, but didn’t get that till early 70s... My mother RIP, still had rotary phones till the day she died (2016) LOL Computers? I suppose we learned about those from watching the Apollo missions with their real to real,looking behemoths that took up whole buildings....same processing power like in a phone now... When your living through it day to day you don’t necessarily get how much things have changed. Sorta like the quality of Dead recordings and how that has progressed. I don’t think there’s too many old timers out there, that started out desperately grabbing any shitty tape thay could because it wasn’t like they were growing on trees, that ever could have imagined the quality and access we have now..
  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    RR tech/recording etc
    The undisputed father/king? what ever of all that has followed, tech wise, was Les Paul. Fascinating man/story. Looping, multi-tracking, ping ponging, effects you name it. He most likely invented it.
  • Oroborous
    Joined:
    Something new is waiting to be born
    Keithfan, though your essay was very good and spot on, I respectfully disagree with your overall premise.I think if we use the human life cycle for analogy, I’d say that the Beatles were not the birth, but more like late adolescence/early adulthood. The coming of age so to speak. They were learning who they were, about the world, and experimenting accordingly like only adolescent people do. Even the embracing of new technology usually is most prevalent amongst the younger generations (I’m generalizing here folks so spare us the one off examples....like just because George Burns lived to be 10?, doesn’t mean smokings not bad for you, science does not work that way) This is why most of the change and cultural shifts that occur, are usually driven by the exuberant, fresh, eager, teens to thirties folks, who are in the physical primes of their lives.....and the brain is of course a physical thing? So I propose, the real birth, the real father, the real King of RR is Mr Chuck Berry. (I know we can take this a step further, but here I would borrow KF’s embryonic example). Imho, Chuck was the guy who really built the platform that almost all other RR was built on, including the Beatles...Hell there are numerous references by the Beatles saying such....and Elvis...He was more like a little leaguer, while a Chuck was JV, and then the Beatles were Pro ballers.... Elvis did not write music, nor would many consider him a real musician. (Yes he could bang out some rhythms and hide behind the guitar like has been done by many “stars” including today’s Taylor Swift etc) He was basically a fine singer who aspired to, and was courted by Hollywood. No offense meant, his influence was immeasurable. But Chuck did it all, and he mostly did it himself, not through others like Elvis.. From the music, to being his own road manager, even driving himself to gigs, He even embraced new technology of the times too. I think Chuck is one of the most under the radar, yet influential persons of the 20th century..... Hey, if you don’t believe me, research what ALL the greats; Beatles, Dead, Stones you name it, they all acknowledge how much he influenced not only them personally, but RR overall. Which due to the cultural shifts and timing, influenced the whole world in a way many today cannot understand unless they were there. Just like we experienced what it was like when the Beatles did it.... So In other words, this is not really my theory at all. It is just me trying to pass along what I have read..... I’m just spitting out what all our hero’s have already stated.... As you have shone, there is no way to even begin to consider all at least popular music (saying all music might be a stretch...), that occurred during and after the Beatles, without acknowledging their influence. But I propose, that you cannt consider the Beatles, without considering how Chuck is in their DNA! Long live the King “Go Johnny Go! (Perhaps the perfect phrase to encompass all that youth, rebelliousness, RR are all about!) You go boy, indeed...
  • icecrmcnkd
    Joined:
    Jerry Lee Lewis isn’t rock n roll?
    Beatles were the birth of Pop. Rock n roll had already been born. But honestly, I don’t really care where the ‘official’ start is because I pretty much just listen to Grateful Dead.
  • Dennis
    Joined:
    keith and R&R birth
    Somethings are hard to pinpoint, but for recording techniques,,, check enoch light's page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Light Pioneer in stereo recordings, hell appears to have invented the gatefold album. Also to early 50's rock recordings developed "cheap" effects, I thought I read once about Sun records recording stuff in bathrooms for echo/reverb effect. Maybe someone singing in a concrete hallway. I always think there is a book to be written about pop music and car stereos. I think recording techniques are older than readily available playback. I don't think you could have had pink Floyd in a 3 watt mono 6 inch speaker in your 58 chevy. I think as car playback systems got better the music got more dense(?). Same can be said for movies maybe. Growing up Perry Mason, F troop sound just fine out of a 8 in mono speaker. Can you imagine watching some marvel movie in 19" mono black and white. I don't think I'd say The Beatles were the birth of rock, if the beatles were all that than they stood on the shoulders of giants. The line of music goes back. Hard to pick a start. I think our age determines our view. The first time you said "the music today....." or "the kids today....", your old!
  • KeithFan2112
    Joined:
    daverock, respectfully
    The birth of Rock and Roll is a matter of perspective to some extent, I agree, but I maintain that the birth of rock, as we know it today, started with the Beatles, and so we witnessed it. Everything prior to that was embryonic (though no less important). R&B, Rocket 88, Rock Around the Clock, Elvis - all cornerstones of the bigger picture, without question, but when I say we witnessed the birth of Rock and Roll, I mean we witnessed the Beatles and all that came after. The Beatles' sound was a truly unique amalgamation of all of those elements you mentioned. None of those elements were singly responsible for contemporary Rock music, but the Beatles were. Further,it was more than The Beatles' sound that was responsible for their unique place in the Rock and Roll annals; it was their integration of new recording technology as well (by that I mean more and more channels to the multi-track, as well as wholly new instruments like the mellotron, as well as tape editing, arrangement, overdubs, etc). The artist push the technology and the technology pushed the artist; this was a symbiotic occurrence that found its way into many early era Rock production ensembles (look at how Pete Townshend introduced minimalist composition technique with organs fed into synthesizers to bring not only new sounds to the rock palette, but to actually create a new mode of rhythm for the genre (i.e. Baba O'Riley & Won't Get Fooled Again). I also mentioned the cultural aspect of rock and roll development. These were children who grew up in the aftermath of World War II. They went on to compose music that was heavily influenced buy current events like the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. They reflected these issues back to their audience with social commentary, and messages of hope or despair (Sympathy for the Devil, All You Need Is Love). And the liberation of the younger generation from what they felt was a very oppressive older generation. Free love, free sex, individual Independence for young people - this still resonates today. So, yes, I understand your point and I agree that those influences where it important, but in the larger picture it was all in utero development, with Elvis perhaps being the last trimester. And then the Beatles came and changed everything, not just music. We did not Witness the conception of rock and roll, just the birth. And this I maintain can never happen again, because it's already been done. The technology, the social climate, heck, all the guitar riffs. Peace.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

7 years 9 months

"The Grateful Dead picked up their instruments and hit the first note with perfection. They never missed a note for the next three and one-half hours. People followed the flow of the tunes. Down on the floor in front of the stage was a sea of heads keeping time with the music. No one sat still. No one, except the youngsters behind us sat still. They were still and stunned." - The Power County Press

And what a stunner it was, that show at the Boise State University Pavilion in Boise, ID on September 2, 1983. Dave's Picks Volume 27 contains every stitch of music from this mid-80s show (our first in this series), one that's as good as any other in Grateful Dead history. When the Dead were on, they were ON! Straight out the gate with a definitive take on the old standard "Wang Dang Doodle," the band swiftly switches back to a setlist of yore, firing off 70s staples like "Jack Straw" and "Brown-Eyed Women" and wrapping things up with a terrific trio of "Big Railroad Blues"/"Looks Like Rain"/"Deal" (don't you let that epic guitar solo go down without you). Primed for the second set, they tackle the complexities of "Help>Slipknot!>Franklin's" with heart and ease. It's clear there will be no stopping their flow - Bobby and Brent hanging in for a fantastic pre-Drums "Jam" and Jerry and Bobby in the zone on a not-to-be-missed melodic "Space." Not a skipper in the whole lot!

Dave's Picks Volume 27 has been mastered to HDCD specs by Jeffrey Norman and it is limited to 18,000 individually-numbered copies*.

*Limited to 2 per order. Very limited quantity available.

user picture

Member for

13 years 1 month
Permalink

Unless you are a compulsive completist.. I wouldn't bother. It's ok..
user picture

Member for

8 years 2 months
Permalink

...the albums song selections were mostly picked by Phil and the others were picked by Garcia... :)Since the official release, there has been complaints and praises for the LP... I for one dig it, I love this LP ! At the time of production, quadraphonic technology appeared ascendant. In anticipation, the album was mixed for the QS standard – one of several competing vinyl matrix formats. Rather than a dedicated stereo mix, during mastering the quadraphonic mix was folded down to two channels. Lesh explained that he and Bear decided to mix "the whole thing in 'quad' ... Band chronicler Blair Jackson explained why Lesh's method for song choice didn't mesh with Deadhead expectation: "[It] had none of the natural flow of a Grateful Dead concert. It was as if someone had thrown all the songs into a hat and then pulled them out randomly, which is not the way the Grateful Dead operated at all. Their sets, while definitely eclectic, were built piece by piece according to what songs felt right to play at the moment. Garcia's choices would affect Weir's choices and vice versa. Steal Your Face consisted mainly of short songs that were usually played in the lighter first set, and it was devoid of any extended improvisation. Considering the material that was available from that five-night run, the song selection was mystifying to say the least."[13] Garcia saw the album as a specific statement from the same era as the movie, noting "[Phil] picked out what he liked for his own reasons. If anyone wants to have some concept of what Phil likes, that's a good album. ... We don't interfere with each other on that level."[13]
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

....Steal Your Face has no flow. (I read between the lines). Glad you like it. I tolerate it. It's right up there with What A Long Strange Trip It's Been. With the plethora of realeases over the last 16 years, they both collect quite a bit of dust, even though the music is clean. ....the again, good luck guessing a JRAD setlist. Ghaa!
user picture

Member for

15 years 11 months
Permalink

This album is my least favorite live Grateful Dead album, however this reissue sounds excellent. The sound is far superior to the original 1976 release, and more than a few steps above the 1989 Compact Disc 1st edition issue. I agree that the Mississippi from 10/19/74 is a good performance, especially the sound on this on reissued LP. Why I don't like Steal Your Face is because of the song sequence, it is not very compelling to me, not even after 42 years. It just doesn't stand up to Live/Dead, Skullfuck & Europe '72. I bought the original LP not long after my 6/22/76 and 6/24/76 shows at the Tower Theater in Upper Darby, near Philadelphia, Pa. Yes, I have all three versions: the original 1976 album, the 1989 CD, and this 2017 remastered LP.
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

....a few heads stated they felt Garcia was playing a different song during the Boise Throwing Stones. No he wasn't. He was playing the Boise Throwing Stones. Does that make sense? Makes sense to me. And the GDTRFB leaves no prisoners. Everyone is released! Ghaaa!
user picture

Member for

9 years 10 months
Permalink

I'm not so keen on Steal Your Face either, I'm afraid. I was really surprised when I started listening to tapes, years later, just how good those October 1974 shows were-and how mis-represented they had been on Steal Your Face. I have felt this about other official live albums they released in their life time, too. Bears Choice is a bit of a shocker-considering some of the music played at those shows, and while Skull and Roses and Europe 72 are okay (especially the last two sides of the old album of Europe 72) they are again much weaker than the shows they were culled from. Again-especially Europe 72-I have listened to every show from the European tour this year-and every one is stellar. But you would never realise just how good the tour was listening to the old Europe 72 album. It seems as though the band thought the record buying public would prefer to hear their songs, rather than their jams. The one live album that has stood the test of time for me unquestionably, is Live Dead. They got THAT one right.
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

....got them all right. Next year, they're gonna bust out the AoxomoxoA and Live/Dead 50th's. Ohhhh shit. Better buckle up. AoxomoxoA is my favorite studio release btw.
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

....Baby Blue. A treasure. And a tear ran down my face, because it was stolen.
user picture

Member for

8 years 3 months
Permalink

...I also have love for ‘Bears’s Choice’, This release is also not very welcomed in the Dead’s fan base, but there’s some there that grabs me; you can hear the wooden floor planks and all...
user picture

Member for

14 years 10 months
Permalink

You know how offensive at least one of this community's core members finds Manson.Please be kind. If you need to oppose JimInMD's outburst (and you have been here long enough to know that Jim is NOT one of our easy-to-rile members, but rather a voice of reason in our often stormy environs) WRITE something. Posting another Manson vid seems really dickish to me. I almost wrote something against Jim's response to your first Manson post (freedom, historical significance, outsider culture, yadda yadda). Now I am really glad I didn't.
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

....has no place here. Fuck that asshole. You want the truth? There aren't many people that would have me put on some leather gloves, so my knuckles wouldn't be tarnished as I pounded his smirky face into a bloody pulp. The veil is lifted. Have fun in hell you piece of shit. (someone had to say it). Fact of life. Some people just need to get their ass kicked. (I speak for the trees). Problem?
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

....is head and shoulders above SYF. Who knew there were so many other choices/USDA prime cuts out there back when it was originally released? We are a spoiled lot....Oh yeah. I would pay to see Manson thrown into a wood chipper. Is there a problem?
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

I think we'd feel entirely different about SYF if it had a third disc. What would have been the perfect jams?
user picture

Member for

6 years 3 months
Permalink

I wouldnt listen to the Beach Boys then cuz Charles Manson known as "The Wizard" befriended a beach boy at the time and co wrote a beach boys song and its now uncredited. that same beach boy slept with a gun under his pillow ever since. read Marilyn Manson's biography his "My Monkey" incorporates elements of that there "mechanical Man" song. played it. I don't even know what to say about it. it's like this big sprawled out rambling mess lol "I sent my monkey off to the country now my monkey's dead" WHAT??? lol and now monkey gone to heaven. shirdeep is communicating and that message is: Monkey
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

.... I've done that. Long story. Last five.The Bangles - Different Light Megadeth - Youthinasia GOGD - 4.15.70 Rush - Farewell To Kings The Cars - Panorama and so it goes....
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

....don't laugh. Good vibes in that record. Such good vibes, they were invited to open for the GOGD. That says something. Dust it off and walk like an Egyptian.
user picture

Member for

7 years 5 months
Permalink

I don't always listen to new releases right away. I had an idea that Bob's recent, "Blue Mountain," was full of boring acoustic campfire songs with, perhaps, lyrical wonder but no musical spark. That was about half true. A solid album and graced by two brilliantly produced nuggets, "Lay My Lily Down," and "Ghost Towns." I won't post links, youtube it if you want. I am shocked that Bob has, at least on these two tunes and to a perhaps lesser extent on others, adopted the pillow over the microphone dull, decades old ambiance reminiscent of recent T-Bone Burnett productions, Daniel Lanois, Robert Plant, etc. I don't know what to call it, so I'll call it "contemporary music by current artists making classy recordings that sound decades old and give me hope that great music will continue." God Bless everyone. Happy Sunday.
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

Hi Vguy72 - you mentioned in a post about the 50th anniversary reissues. Do you know if the live albums are going to be reissued or is it just the studio? Cheers
user picture

Member for

9 years 10 months
Permalink

Two live Dead albums I did like-and still do-are Historic Dead and Vintage Dead. Slightly shady releases, but for live albums from 1966 they sound really good. Unlike the later ones I mentioned, these do seem to accurately reflect the bands sound and style, as subsequently revealed on tapes from the year in question. I don't think they have ever been released on cd, either.
user picture

Member for

6 years 11 months
Permalink

Can you please stop posting all of the YouTube links. They're distracting and not relevant to any Grateful Dead discussion. Thank you.
user picture

Member for

8 years
Permalink

I have this on an LP which is an old radio station promo copy. Its all beat up, and doesn't sound so good anymore. Probably been played 100s of times. I'm tempted to hear a good, new copy. I think the format of the album is well suited for an LP. Its mostly shorter songs, not twenty minute jams. It doesn't "feel" like a live set --- more like an album that happens to be live tracks. Which is okay sometimes. 20-25 minutes of an upbeat, bouncy side while I'm grilling some steaks is perfect. I like the E72 LP for the same reason. Also, curiously, that album isn't on Spotify. Almost everything else that's a general release is. Neither is the GD movie soundtrack, which is what you go to for the live show feel from that run. Maybe they're holding it back for a box set release later :)))))
user picture

Member for

11 years 8 months
Permalink

When I saw Bob live in Dallas for this cowboy tour, Lay My Lily Down was one of my fav's that night. When I got the show I played the living shit out of that tune. Just my two cents, but I'm ok with Sheepdip posting youtube vids. I certainly don't check them all out, but they're easy enough to scroll by and once an awhile you get shown some good stuff you didn't know about. Once again, just my two cents. Two more days of work, then off to Lockn, yeah!
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

I am happy for the 80's fans who have waited long for something from this era. I think I would have had a really good time if I had been at the show, this must be great as a souvenir and a slice of history for those lucky enough to have access to Dead shows at that time (they had given up on Europe by then). Listening now in a quiet room on a good hi-fi though, it is all to easy to be distracted by the deterioration of so many things from the 'Golden Era'(as I perceive it). I enjoyed it more than I thought and maybe now and then might give it another spin. No complaints though. I am happy to pay my subs and get to focus 4 times a year on a selected show from the vault, whether I end up listening to it once or 100 times.
user picture

Member for

6 years 11 months
Permalink

Once I awhile shirdeeps vids are ok, but they're getting to be several times a day of nothing about the Dead. Charles Manson? Had his minions string up a woman 8 months pregnant over a rafter and stab her death as she begged for her baby's life. Fuck him and fuck shirdeep for posting this garbage. Shirdeep used to be cool when he posted rare Dead pics, but he's devolved.
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

Butch, right on fuck that spoiled little bitch! Sorry folks that’s what happens when you poison the Golden well with hate! SYF, I will not argue with the critical comments. Would just mention, again, about keeping perspective. The methodology employed for live albums has mostly been to record as much material as possible, using the best equipment possible (budget etc) and then cull the supposed “best” versions of songs, add a little crowd mix and fade in out overlaps to give the “product” the feeling of an actual concert. Hell King Biscuit Flour Hour used to do the same thing I.e., 5/80 (recorded that off the radio on graduation night whilrpe my giant extended family was all out in the back yard, hee-hee, what a freak! But I digress. So yeah, it has no natural flow, and of course anything from then without big jams is just......? But there are some great versions, and if it was redone as well as the Movie Soundtrack, well..... Mainly though I love this album for nostalgia. It brings back so many memories from when I was 14 and just getting on board. Have always loved the pictures; Bill with that giant bong, Phil with the different colored socks, and man nothing filled the imagination of a budding audio geek like those pics of TWOS! Remember youngins’ there was no internet, and the dead was hardly the well known entity they would become, for good or for ill? That album and a few others were like are only gateway to the dead! So looking at those pics, and digging that amazing, now iconic art...and of course what that album jacket as well as Skull fuck got used for, perhaps more than to retrieve the platter, ahem, yeah..... I will always have a spot deep in my heart for this and skullfuck if only because of what they meant to me at that time in my life etc. Today, hands down, imho, Live Dead will always be the benchmark for not only live dead “albums” but perhaps the greatest live album ever! I dug it then, but still a little to green behind the gills to fully “get it” then. That did change with time, like the first time I “saw the electric light shine” and after getting dropped off at home very late, put on the headphones and figured, “I should probably listen to live dead” Amazing, also, seemed like it was only ten minutes long LOL Tried playing my electric with no amp, but thought I was making too much noise and would awaken the rents, who would instantly KNOW! LMAO! Too funny, cause I lived in the basement with a literal McIntosh, JBL wall of sound, used to come home baracho at all hours, worked as a roadie and sound tech, so again, coming and going at all hours, and they never got up. But of course that night I was sure they’d be on to me! I distinctly remeber after like 12 hours or so thinking “ah, this is what they mean by your either on the bus or off” like, this is never going to end LOL. You know, it will be less there, but it’s always going to be there! NOTE; I personally really think Nightfall of Diamonds is right up there in the top echelon; an actual full show, not cut ups, great audio, super set list. I think this one really flies under the radar. NEW SERIES; I’ve been saying this for years. Not specifically like who was it Kayak Guy? with the Betty Special Select concept, but the general idea of more releases, even if you have different tiers or levels of product. The super multi’s, that deserve the extra care and exspense get released say 4 or 5 times a year, with a box or 2 for the top tier, with perhaps a level, or two more below, including a quick and dirty Cassete SB type level ala 27. Those could certainly be pumped out a bit more steadily. If it’s a matter of staff, Hell im qualified and available. Me and Vguy will spit out enough product to make you dizzy! I fully understand and agree with who ever (sorry?? Memory shot) laid out the great marketing plan that is probably in play about releasing older stuff first since it will attract folks from tha era, as well as the rest, before all us geezers croak, while saving the later years for the youngins from that era. Makes sense, no matter what your fav, I think most folks really love to get official releases of shows they were at, in any form. But they are gambling on this remaining as vibrant, and thus as economically viable, as it is now. Why not get as much out now as possible? What if suddenly they lose their audience? I believe after the band folded, that was sort of the goal. I believe I read something from Mickey about trying to make every show somehow available ala cart so folks could just order what ever they pleased. But then Phil put the kibosh on it with “Im not selling the catalog to a Corp/won’t ever let trucking apear on a Chevy commercial” etc.. At the time that kinda made sense, just like finding someone to Front the huge digitizing costs etc to make it available made some sense. But much time has passed since then, and tech and the music industry have radically changed. So yeah, why the hell not have tiered releases, priced and released according. As our lovely English friends might say RIGHT, BRILLIANT!
user picture

Member for

9 years 10 months
Permalink

Some are really good-the blues and jazz ones from a while back were great. And that one of King Crimson with Adrian Belew on vocals was alright. I don't think shirdeep posted any of these-he has different taste to me-but hey ho. I wasn't so keen on seeing Mansons face peering out at me when I scrolled down, mind you.
user picture

Member for

6 years 3 months
Permalink

I have all four kiss solo albums. I still have yet to give a full listen to Peter's and Ace's.
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

SYF is on Spotify although it isn’t named as such - it’s listed as Grateful Dead Records collection and is with the other albums issued on Record Store Day as a box set, Mars, Wake of the Flood, Blues for Allah although these again are not listed under their actual original titles. SYF is actually called live at Winterland San Francisco CA 10-20/74 after each individual song title.
user picture

Member for

13 years 1 month
Permalink

.
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

“English pig dog, I fart in your general,direction,Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of Elderberries!
user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

to have a little fun....The dead heads will put you on the rocks!
user picture

Member for

6 years 3 months
Permalink

felt like I was watching a Time Life compilation late night infomercial. but wait! there's more....
user picture

Member for

13 years 1 month
Permalink

user picture

Member for

17 years 1 month
Permalink

....thanx. Like I said a few days ago, social media is a cancer. Behold it in all it's glory. My safe corner of the internet is compromised. Way to go home.. . "Who do you think you are? What do you mean when you put us all down Walking round in circles Your nose to the ground You think you're saying something Because you're making a sound You say you've seen it all You don't care to see no more But you don't get up an go until they throw you out the door." ....Looks like Vince is the smartest man in the room right now. Shazam.
user picture

Member for

13 years 1 month
Permalink

:D
user picture

Member for

17 years
Permalink

....so the Mets and Phillies played a game that counts, on a little league field in front of a bunch of fans. Some of which are little league players. There is hope in the world.
user picture

Member for

6 years 3 months
Permalink

so are you being all butt hurt with me cuz im not exactly throwing a temper tantrum over someone posting up a manson video days ago, and was curious as to what something might sound like, and not joining mob rule on "hey fuck shirdeep"?
user picture

Member for

13 years 1 month
Permalink

Smiling on a cloudy day.
user picture

Member for

6 years 3 months
Permalink

yeah im sure its totally over my head. im pretty sure I hit the nail on the head lol moving on.
product sku
081227931599