• 1,003 replies
    marye
    Joined:
    When our previous topic hit the 1,000-response mark, sleazy behavior by politicians was eliciting a certain amount of non-astonishment.

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • marye
    Joined:
    well, um, Hal...
    Barlow is LDS. Not practicing, obviously, but comes from a long line of Mormons. In answer to the question, the Mormon Church and also (to my shame, because I'm Catholic like Barlow is Mormon...) the Catholic Church kicked in a lot of money. But it is also the case that the Bay Area is a relative island, even in California, and there is plenty of religious fundamentalism and just plain bigotry to go around throughout the state. And yeah, there was a lot of stirring up of hate among Latinos and among the black churches as well. Indeed, it was much speculated that the very people who turned out to elect Obama also turned out to pass Prop 8, at least where the black churches were concerned. So it's complicated. But it's also just plain wrong and I'm grateful to Judge Walker for his good sense. My own view is that the state should get out of the marriage business and only do civil unions, being that civil marriage is fundamentally about property and responsibility for children, and let religious, cultural, etc. bodies declare whoever they want in their communions married. And yeah, this includes the fundie Mormons if they stick to consenting adults.
  • tphokie1
    Joined:
    Way to go Judge Walker!
    I know this fight is not over. This will be appealed but its still a step in the right direction. Everyone should be free to love whomever they choose and have that acknowledged by society!
  • Hal R
    Joined:
    I won't blast Mormons here
    but the fact is that LDS was a major if not the major player behind Prop. 8. By the way I've met all sorts of Deadheads of various and no faiths but has anyone ever met an LDS head? If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is, infinite. William Blake
  • Anonymous (not verified)
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Straight From Vermont
    is a bumpersticker seen on old, beat-up pick-up trucks around these parts. It seems that the rather sexually insecure have to make their intemtion in the sexual area perfectly clear because Vermont was first in the nation to allow civil unions and of the last couple of years gay marriage. It hasn't spoiled the place. How is it in the land of LA and SF that there is this conservative backlash? Is it hispanic machismo/Catholicism? It can't be the Oakies, there aren't enough pure bread of'em left. What gives Mary? Who is behind Prop 8 in Cali?
  • marye
    Joined:
    In other news...
    Judge Vaughn Walker, who I have always considered a sensible man and a credit to the bench, overturned California's Prop 8 with nasty words on the side: "Proposition 8 'fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. … Because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.'" God bless Judge Walker and get him appointed to the Supremes.
  • TigerLilly
    Joined:
    Hey Hal!
    Indeed!********************************** By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another man's I mean. Mark Twain
  • Hal R
    Joined:
    Iraq lie
    TL, many folks here did not believe the Bush lies, there were massive protests throughout the country. As well as the world. Please never forget the mass movement which many of us were involved in. If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is, infinite. William Blake
  • Anonymous (not verified)
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    To be fair...
    ...There is an anti-war movement out there. I didn't mean to diminish the efforts of many, many patriotic Americans who do what they can to oppose this madness. And I am told that opposition to America's jihad is quite intense in parts of Europe. I was only trying to point out 2 things: There is a cost to war The face of protest is quite different these days I like what the leader of Wikki Leaks had to say (Simon, I think) "It's a damn war" Indeed a damn war. A low intensity conflict in which there are no major battles, simply groups of armed warriors sneaking up on one another. On the NATO side, if the conflict is extended at all, air power is called in that usually results in a lot of casualties with collateral damage. When we realize that this is not helping our cause among the natives, we strive (per McChrystal's suggestion), to change the rules of engagement so that we are able to make real progress, only to have push-back from our own forces, whom we come to find out don't give a damn about civilians or the Taliban, only wanting to leave the theater of operations in one piece. I don't fault them for that one bit, however it does point out big-time the slippery slope we are falling down. In the meantime, these mountains of desolate waste are host to wandering bands of reconnoitering commandos able to call down reaper and predator drone-fired missiles on whatever targets of opportunity they stumble upon. Americans need to see that we could have pursued this as a police action instead of a military conflict. We had the sympathy of the world and could have made these radical extremists the bad guys, even to their own people. Instead, a decision at the highest levels was made to pursue a war. This war is being fought because our "Way Of Life" is under attack. This is really the heart of the matter... In an increasingly globalized economy of post-peak oil the US cannot afford to allow the Muslim oil countries the natural economic advantage that would be theirs as oil becomes more scarce, thus entitling to ever-greater reserves of hard currency. Therefore we need to step in and try to divide the Muslims. In reality, this war is about economics and the ever-shrinking pie we all split. Other countries tend to resent it when you are 3% of the world's population and you are consuming 60% of the world's resources. I could march on with this rant but I'll stop here as I do believe what I've just stated is the heart of it. ~ I'm going off to war To fight on some foreign shore ~
  • JackstrawfromC…
    Joined:
    Lies
    True Americans did fall for the lie. When the towers hit the ground and everyone was freaking out it was really easy to believe the hype "terrorists have WOMD, they live in Iraq and they are coming to kill us", in the midst of the frenzy and fear we had to believe it. But it became clear rather quickly when the focus was on Hussein and not Bin Laden that our doofus president had a different agenda. "The dire wolf collects his due while the boys sing round the fire"
  • TigerLilly
    Joined:
    Iraq lie
    But Americans believed that lie for quite a while! Propaganda and hype were high. For example some collegues and I were aggressed on the streets of NYC for daring to speaking French (because Chirac said "hell no we won't go to Iraq" and anti-French sentiment was rampant). I seems that it took until folks started to die, for the brainwashing hype to lose effect. Sat over here and watched the War in Iraq unfold right there on CNN-like Wag the Dog, and yeah well had a rough time with my homeland back then! ********************************** By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another man's I mean. Mark Twain
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Forums
When our previous topic hit the 1,000-response mark, sleazy behavior by politicians was eliciting a certain amount of non-astonishment.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

We're here trying to scare ourselves to death and you go and say something funny...
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

Seems like current events are on a comparatively small scale. On 13-14 March 1904, an article in the Quarterly Journal of Ornithology reported at least 750,000 migrating Lapland Longspurs were found dead in Worthington, Minnesota. Some were said to have flown against buildings, electric lights and wires, and others to have dashed themselves on frozen ground and ice. The dead birds were sprawled over 1,500 square miles. If that starts happening now on a regular basis, then I'll start to worry.
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

So F'ed up everywhere this winter that I wouldn't doubt that has something to do with this madness. "It's got no signs or dividing line and very few rules to guide"
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I am not loving the reports about Jam Cruise passengers being busted by DEA types before the boat set sail on January 4th. I'm sure a lot of us have friends on that boat...
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I have been reading daily reports from the Jam Cruise ship, but I have not seen any mention of DEA actions beforehand. Living in a land where the (allegedly) evil weed is tolerated, if not totally legal, I fail to see the logic and mentality behind this sort of behaviour. Sadly in most countries it seems to be based on a political doctrine that has little to do with fact and more to do with perpetuating myths to ensure that, come the next election, the ill-informed electorate will return these politicians to their cosy positions of power.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

How can a society have dumped that far into the toilet that such a thing could occur? A little girl f-ing died, and there is no excuse nor explanation for that. This insane rot-spewing of hate has got to stop!********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

by a 22 year old 'shooter', that this morning reportedly has connections to the American Renaissance movement which espouses anti-goverment, anti-immigrant, and anti-semetic views. 6 dead including a sitting Arizona chief justice, several elderly womena & men, a 9 year old girl, and a staffer from the wounded congresswoman's office. It has been confirmed that the congresswoman was the target at her 'meet and greet' event. 20 victims wounded or dead. Those who have called for 'second amendment remedies' or stated 'if we don't win by ballots, we can win by bullets' would be wise to reconsider the tenor of their comments. Such speech may have consequences, especially with zealots, criminals, terrorists (including McVey), especially if you add mental illness to the mix. Tragic all the way around. The Truth is realized in an instant, the act is practiced step by step.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

why I don't pack up my kids and move back to the States.One reason (but not the only one) is that here, things happen, sure-they could get hit by a car or something; but it is a whole lot LESS likely that they'll run into a maniac waving a gun. ********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

this was an act of cowardice and makes no sense. The Congresswoman was liked and respected by both parties. Even the nuttiest "gun nuts" that I know wouldn't pull a stunt like this. These poor people were unarmed, threatening no-one, and innocent. Another senseless act of violence which served no purpose that a rational mind can comprehend. My thoughts and prayers go out to the victims and their families..
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years 2 months
Permalink

thing is crazy and saddens me right down to my socks!!!!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

ripple!!!********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years 2 months
Permalink

spam face!!!!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years 2 months
Permalink

offend any of my american brothers and sisters or anyone else at all, i understand this 2nd amendment but personally dont agree with guns or weapons of any discription whether i be for defence reasons or whatever elsepeace and love to all!!!!
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

agree that the tone and tenor of the debate in America would improveif threats or allusion to violence were eliminated from the discourse. From the right and the left alike. This link does call out the far right as currently several will known figures are currently denying that anyone has made threats and this issue is a fabrication of the media and the left. In this day and age, whatever people have said is 'on the record'. http://www.truth-out.org/the-wrath-fools-an-open-letter-to-far-right666… The Truth is realized in an instant, the act is practiced step by step.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

is the rapidity with which the increased-civility imperative in the wake of the shooting has devolved into the usual finger-pointing, protestations of aggrieved innocence, and assertions of victimhood by the usual suspects at all parts of the political (and other) spectrum. This is not helpful.
user picture
Default Avatar
Permalink

The AZ tragedy is purely about guns, not superheated political rhetoric or anything else. Here in VT I can buy a pistol without waiting and carry it concealed. The availability of guns and all the evidence we have all over the world point out significantly that if this toolkit didn't have access to a gun these people in AZ would still be alive. Fuck the 2nd Amendment!!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Tiger Lilly: I like the picture of our former president in the upper right corner. Gonz: If we outlaw guns, then only outlaws will have guns. To all: Peace on Earth & good will toward Man. Some of my Christmas cards say this. How can we learn and practice to be kind and more tolerant with each other?
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

Guns are only one of them. I'll be keeping mine thank you very much. But no offense taken if you don't agree. "It's got no signs or dividing line and very few rules to guide"
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

and should not have had access to firearms, or weapons in general for that matter. The signs were there, and while the people that knew him saw the signs, no-one did a damn thing about it, now many lives are ruined and changed forever, including his. That being said, I can respect the opinions of people that are against firearms, I just can't agree with them. As long as the government has access to weapons, the people need the same access. I need to be able to protect myself, my family, my property. When seconds count, the police are minutes away and who the hell trusts them? And as long as I fear my government (and i do) I'll keep my weapons. I also agree with marye...the blame game doesn't help one darn bit. Ted...you're right....how CAN we learn and practice more tolerance and kindness?
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Not sure what it is, but something about that slogan has always made me cringe in the most inexpressible way. But yup, that's what it means: if you have a gun, we take it away from you and throw you in jail. Makes it easier to tell who the criminals are -- they're the ones with the guns! I grew up in a house with guns. My Dad used to be (no longer is) a hunter. I'm the first-born, so I got the bulk of the indoctrination. And actually, I LIKE shooting guns. There is some fun around that activity. But put me out hunting and give the chance to shoot something that's alive...that part didn't take. I couldn't do it, don't want to do it. And I have managed to survive to age 55 without owning a gun, without shooting a gun since my teens. Good for me. I'll continue to take my chances. I don't begrudge hunters and sports shooters and folks who think they need guns to protect them and theirs. I do have a Big problem with where we draw the line -- a shotgun in your home is going to be pretty damn effective for protection...much less worrying about that pesky aiming that you'd have to do with the adrenaline pumping through your veins when the moment comes. A Glock with a 30-round magazine? We need that? Guns don't kill people...but people with guns kill a LOT of people. Peace, friends. Condolences to all the victims of violence, regardless of the choice of weapon.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

2008 Murders in the USA Total = 14,299 Methods used Firearms = 9,484 Knives and blades = 1,897 Blunt objects = 614 Personal weapons (= fists, boots etc.) = 861 Other (poisons, explosives, narcotics etc.) = 993 Source http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/law_enforcement_courts_pris… Lots of other statistics on that site yeah yeah I know the feds doctored the figures! Guncrime in the USA state by state: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/10/gun-crime-us-state Yeah I know the Guardian is a left leaning newspaper so they probably made the figues up Murder rates per year per 100,000 population Mexico 15 USA 5 UK 1.28 France 1.6 Germany 0.86 Source: wikepedia yeah I know wikipedia is full of lies and is run by traitors, just like wikileaks
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years 2 months
Permalink

not stringent checks when buying guns there?
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

there are no stringent checks. Or at least what I saw on German news, there are no checks at all. Any deranged person can walk in to a shop, and out with a gun. Then take it to the grocery store with him, some restaurants, etc etc. In case the cabbages get out of hand, you know! ********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

in the US are subject to background check with NICS and are done at the point of purchase. There is a phone number that is called direct to the FBI. If there is nothing in the database the sale goes through.There are lengthy forms to be filled out with personal information that is kept on file by the shop. I have often seen the shop receive a "hold" and they are not allowed to proceed. This could be for any number of reasons, felony on record, restraining order, domestic violence, health issues, under age, etc. and the sale is on hold until the shop receives a go ahead. This can take up to 30 days. Furthermore, even if there is no record, you must have a concealed weapons permit (in the states that require them) to leave THAT DAY with a purchased handgun. If no permit, there is a waiting period. If someone had reported to the proper authorities that this young man had health issues, no sale would have been allowed. Criminals, however do not use federally licensed gun stores and so do not deal with these stringent regulations. They steal them or buy them stolen. Several thousand purchases are stopped daily by dealers that actually use the system in place and it is required by law to use this system.
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

then they are pretty much on the money, believe it or not, the feds don't generally doctor this kind of info. The criteria used to collect it is questionable, and other sources that use this information may distort it, but the info itself is pretty much true.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

I think Badger was being sarcastic with the comments about his statistics pages :-)********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

you were wrong about permits in AZ http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/p/gunlaws_az.htm from Wikipedia: On April 16, 2010, governor Jan Brewer signed into law a bill that legalizes the carrying of concealed firearms and other weapons in most places without a permit for adults over 21 years of age. ********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

That guns are the most effective of killing tools. My point is take away ALL the guns in the world and the crazies will come up with a new method of destruction. Guns like automobiles require a high degree of responsibility to operate them. The goal is to never ever use it (except for hunting and target practice) but man like johnman says, if the day ever came (God forbid) where I needed it, I'll be glad I have one. I truely respect folks who hate guns, they are scary, but most gun owners are responsible and shouldn't be condemed. "It's got no signs or dividing line and very few rules to guide"
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Fire- arms murders as % of all murders US-67.07%... from the chart in CB's link Think that's fricking scary ********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

But the difference now-a-days is the general lack of respect between people. At its worst is the lack of respect for our gift of life. When I was growing up and going to elementary and hgh school, if you had a problem with someone you confronted them and at the worst you duked it out "after school under the flag pole on the black top" and that was usually the end of it. You would go home with a black eye and that was it. Even during a playground fist-fight, there was respect for life (i.e. no one pulling out a weapon). Now kids have decided to skip the confrontation part and go straight to the solution - bring a gun to school and shoot the place up (lack of repsect for other's life) and then turn the gun on themselves (lack of respect for own life). I don't know about you all but we had just as easy access to weapons back then as kids do now, maybe even more so, but no one ever pulled out a weapon back then. I just wonder and ask myself - when, how and why did we shift over to a state of such hopelessness that murder and suicide are the only solutions?? "It's got no signs or dividing line and very few rules to guide"
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

which has shooting deaths a go go every year (and while historically much of this has been no-goodnik-on-no-goodnik violence, more and more innocents are getting caught in the crossfire these days, from babies to grannies). It also has a county sheriff whose policy is to make it essentially impossible for any resident of Alameda County who's a regular civilian to get a concealed carry permit. Stringent laws on the books don't necessarily have the intended result.
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

That's why I specified "states that require ". I am aware of AZ not having a requirement, Alaska, too...and i think maybe Vermont. But still, in order to make a purchase, a background check is required. In DC no one is allowed a permit (at least not regular folks like you and I) and until the supreme court decision, if you had a weapon in the house (in DC), it had to be disassembled, effectively making it useless, however, in the states where permits are allowed or where a permit is not required, crime percentage is perceptively lower than it is where criminals know that there is less chance of people fighting back. Unfortunately, this doesn't stop the random nutcase like the shooter in AZ, who, again, ruined the lives of innocents and himself. I wish this all wasn't necessary....wish we could all just listen to music and enjoy life...wish all the mean, greedy selfish people would just go the hell away.....I wish........
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

children should be given two cookies, and taught to share one, then, maybe, everyone would have a cookie and not have to steal someone else's cookie.....
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Maybe the mean, greedy, selfish people will be the ones who disappear from the earth on May 21. We can only hope. IMHO, strict gun laws only work if they are universal in nature. As long as every state does its own thing, and that own thing varies as extremely as it does in the US, then anyone who wants a gun will be able to get one. That's painfully obvious. And...let's see. I look at it this way. And I'll carry the analogy to the extreme. 90,000-160,000 people died as a result of the US dropping an atomic bomb on Hiroshima during WWII. Is this just people killing people, or does maybe the potency of the weapon play some role in the results? If the nutcase in Tuscon had "just" a .38 revolver with a 5-round capacity in his hand as opposed to a Glock with a 30 round magazine, a lot less carnage would have ensued. So to get back to the extreme, if the potency of the weapon is irrelevant, then why are we all so hyped up over the prospects of Iran obtaining a nuke? That's what I'm referring to when I ask the question: where do we draw the line?
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

I totally agree about the ridiculously easy access the general public has to military/police-style guns can play a large roll in all this madness and helps make the situation much much worse. "It's got no signs or dividing line and very few rules to guide"
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

except that I firmly believe that the 2nd amendment is one of the checks and balances that the people have against a complete totalitarian government...so, another extreme....if the government has access, the people should have access. I still believe this is the main reason that the amendment was included in the bill of rights, without the 2nd, you may not have the 1st, or the 4th....and while I'm on the bill of rights...what's up with it now being illegal to film or tape police in the....ahem..."performance" of their duties?...........if the rapture DOES occur on May 21, I'm pretty sure the mean, greedy people will be left out since they are mostly likely the type that have warped and distorted Christ's teachings of loving one another, into hating those that are different.............can I have a cookie?
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

this doesn't bring back those innocent lives........nor heal the wounds......
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". I'm still one of those who get hung up on this wording. I've always read the "right" statement as referring to the "well regulated Militia," -- otherwise, why is the militia part there at all? My perhaps muddled understanding of this was that the individual colonies/states didn't have standing armies to protect themselves, so folks needed weapons in their possession in order to heed the call when a threat of force was brought to bear against the well-being of the "free State We aren't dealing with that today, and our current activist Supreme Court (how I love, as a liberal, to use that phrase in relation to a Conservative-dominated court) has ruled that I'm just plain wrong in my thinking. So throwing my interpretation out the window, the right to keep and bear Arms "shall not be infringed", given a lack of definition of the term "Arms", given a literal reading would mean to me that yes, I indeed do have the right to (getting back to the extreme) possess my own personal nuclear weapon. So this was the intent of the framers of the Constitution? But Johnman, I do like your checks and balances argument, for what it's worth. It's just apparent to me that the "intent" of the framers is unknown in this case, and given the advance in weaponry since its writing, probably irrelevant. Which leaves us where we are today: a country where the overwhelming majority of gun deaths are not related to defense of home and life, but to murder and accidents. Again, condolences to all who have suffered violence in their lives, whatever the source. And pass the cookies and beer -- I can use some right now.
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

but with all the books, CD's, video and audio tapes, DVD's and records I have...I dunno where I'd put the damn thing. I think the intent (and from what I have read) was that a militia, made up of citizens, was needed because a standing army was not wanted, for fear it could be used against the citizenry. And then, I'm reminded that all the OTHER amendments refer to the rights of INDIVIDUALS, so why wouldn't the 2nd? Another thing I think that needs to be addressed is the increasing number of violent criminals that are released from prison, while some poor schmuck who's only crime was smoking a little herb is kept locked up for God knows HOW long, while that rapist, or murderer, or armed robber, is out on the street, pulling his bullshit, and giving me cause to require an ability to defend myself...WTF?? Cookies and beer....I may have to indulge this evening, as the Mouse will be gone to Seattle to attend a...."formal" rave.....(yeah, I don't get it either), so Ben the dog and I will have the house to ourselves.... I've enjoyed this...rational discourse is so refreshing, rather than finger pointing and hate speech ...which BOTH sides are guilty of.....
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

I'm wondering now that I've publically (though facetiously and specifically to make a point) expressed my belief that I've got a right to a nuke (I think I can fit one in my garage if I move a car out)...has some secret gov't internet-spying keyword search now slid me into a "watch, potential terrorist" category? Another shudder. If I get strip-searched the next time I go through security in an airport, I guess I'll know. And I'm with you on who's in jail and who's not thought. If you weren't on the other side of the country, I'd stop on by to hoist a couple and continue the conversation. Happy Friday!
user picture

Member for

15 years 10 months
Permalink

I'll drink a beer (well tonight) with ya and make a toast towards no more blood shed **clink**. Oh and wash it down with a little smokie tokie! Which may very well lead to some cookies =) Happy MLK weekend to everyone! "It's got no signs or dividing line and very few rules to guide"
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

these well thought out and politely stated discussion points. Dean's especially! Love you too Johnman, but I agree with gratefuldean :) About your Iraq nuke question (good one btw) the US is very big on "do as I say, not as I do" with regards to foreign policy. That would be my answer to that question. ********************************** I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

some time back, a friend of mine moved to Switzerland, where, apparently, each householder is required to keep a shotgun in good order for times of civic need. This has figured prominently in one or two movies as I recall. I'd be curious how it plays out in real life, as I suspect that even now there are few places more peaceable than Switzerland.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

One big reason I like hanging here is because we are on the side of respectful discourse, in spite of differing opinions...much too rare in the harsh world of the internet, and much more unfortunately, the "real" world as well. Plus the music, of course. Cookies too, though I'm hankering for cake right about now. Back to quoting Dylan (from my post on "what is a Deadhead") We always did feel the same, we just saw it from a different point of view...
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

Once they have served in the military (and I may be mistaken, but I think all males are required to do a coupla years service) they maintain the weapon they are issued. I recently saw a short news blurb/documentary kinda thing on this. Shooting sports are very big there, with whole families involved, from granny down to the older children. The two or three people they interviewed had their weapons, and their father's and grandfather's. I believe they created the Biathlon which entails cross country skiing and marksmanship skills and it is an Olympic event. The Swiss seem to be a pretty calm bunch, too....haven't heard about any nutcases there shooting up McDonalds or anything, that I am aware of. I expect it's all about respect, and being raised with respect..... Here's to more respectful and rational discussions...and ALOT more good music!!!
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

Innocent lives were lost, an elected representative that has the respect of both parties was seriously injured, responsible gun owners are vilified, a background check system didn't work....there are NO winners here.......