Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • Anonymous (not verified)
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Yeah, makes sense
    Bob was really into it most of the time, putting in 110%, especially on his vocals. If you're trying to "fill the sky withe flame" it stands to reason you're gonna put out a few joints in the front rows (yuk-yuk.)
  • stuman
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    no not intentional spitting
    But from what I`ve always heard he just used to let loose while he was singing . now keep in mind I only heard of this actually happening I never had the oportunity to be in the front row . now I have seen a few video`s where he did let some loose but that may be a little normal would`nt it be ? I`m not a singer either . I know some people spit when they talk so it would only make sense that some people would spit when they sing .
  • Anonymous (not verified)
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Hey Stu! Do you mean...
    ... Bob used to let loose with the saliva when he sang? Or that he actually spit on people? I'd hate to think it was the latter...
  • johnman
    Joined:
    dear tiger
    it's ok.....i saw the humor in it!
  • johnman
    Joined:
    i never realized
    so much saliva could be FOUND in one person, gosh, he's like a faucet. think that might be the reason for the moustache?
  • stuman
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Bobby humor
    I always liked the story`s of people in the Bobby zone getting spat upon by Bobby. One of the reasons I never sat in the front row at any shows . LOL
  • TigerLilly
    Joined:
    LOL gotcha gonzo
    sadly sarcasm doesn't always show in written text, and you have hit a major personality flaw in the head-can be hasty and ferocious to defend my pals, to the point of being rash!********************************** By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another man's I mean. Mark Twain
  • Deadicated
    Joined:
    Speaking of lame attempts at humour ...
    What's your fav between song Bobby joke or story? I always liked "No Nose". Har, har. " Where does the time go? "
  • Anonymous (not verified)
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    ease up, Lilly of the valley
    it was only meant as a lame attempt at humor, not at all serious. lame-o gonzo
  • TigerLilly
    Joined:
    gonzo don't really like that "we"
    I, for one, have never suspected anything but good intentions from Johnman. He and I have one or two issues where we certainly don't see eye to eye-but have always been 100% sure that his heart's in the right place.********************************** By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another man's I mean. Mark Twain
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Forums
Our beloved freeform topic reborn!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Directly below Venus towards the horizone the next brightest object is Jupiter. Now turn 180 degrees and you will see mars shining a soft red. Magic!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

I live in the country tonight! Unpolluted by too many lights! :D Spectacular!!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

When I saw the Moon and Venus last night, I looked for Jupiter, which has been nearly aligned with Venus in the evening sky the last couple of weeks, but it seemed to have set. I'll step out a bit earlier tonight and see what there is to see.
user picture

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

March has been a great month for viewing the waxing moon, Jupiter & Venus.When Venus passes from the evening to the morning sky on June 6, 2012, it’ll swing directly in front of the sun. This is called a transit of Venus. Transits of Venus are rare, happening only two times in the 21st century, with none in the 20th century. I think Mars can be found within Leo: will advise.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Please do, Ted!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

I live in the mountains of southern California and at dusk last night, Jupiter was visible just above the horizon, Venus was higher in the sky and the Moon hung above them both. I was standing out on my front porch taking it in when a couple of LDS missionaries walked up and asked me how I was doing. I told them that it was a good night to be pondering the infinite and when they tried to work that idea into the introduction of their spiel, I told them that the visible heavens were enough for me and wished them a fine evening.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Mormons, Lilly. Sorry about that. I'm partial to referring to them as LDS, since it somewhat dyslexically resembles one of my favorite acronyms. I thought about asking them about Romney and the Etch-A-Sketch uproar, but I was feeling pretty mellow at the time and didn't want to get into with them, politically.
user picture

Member for

12 years 8 months
Permalink

They are always young and enthusiastic and well dressed and educated. I like them better than Hare Krishnas or Jehovah's Witnesses, which I don't see around anymore. Moonies either. Ocho freaks are gone too. Ohh well, guess we're stuck LDSers and other minor cults. I don't mind giving them a drink and discussing their cosmology with them. Their version of world history is like a Disney movie! But, you know, whatever you want to believe. More freedom to you.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Hey, is it just me, or does this page not display correctly? The post boxes seem much narrower here than in other discussions. Did someone not close a < table > tag? < edit > It looks like all the posts since September 30, 2010 are nested as replies under c_c's post on that date.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

although it may be a function of how many posts you're choosing to display on a page. I'll go take a look at cc's post of 9/30/2010 and see if anything's odd.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

You're right. I had my options set at 300 posts per page, changed it to 10, and now it looks fine. Thanks again.
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I think since most of us have our pages broken up so we're not seeing posts from 2010 and the formatting thereof, it's not such an issue, but I also think that since this topic has been running for three years it's about time to roll the darn thing into a new version anyway. Stay tuned.