• 7,852 replies
    admin
    Joined:

    "When we began discussing audio projects to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Grateful Dead back in 2012, we knew we wanted to do something completely unprecedented. We could think of nothing more exciting or ambitious than a career-spanning overview of the band's live legacy focused on what best tells the story: complete concerts. Our first criterion was the very best live music to represent any given year in the band’s history. We wanted to make sure that there were not only the tent-pole shows that fans have been demanding for decades but also ones that are slightly more under the radar, but equally excellent. For those who listen to the entire box straight through, chronologically, the narrative of the Grateful Dead's live legacy will be seen as second to none in the pantheon of music history." - David Lemieux

    We are more than pleased to announce the Grateful Dead's most ambitious release ever: 30 TRIPS AROUND THE SUN. Available as both an 80-disc boxed set and a custom lightning-bolt USB drive, the collection includes 30 unreleased live shows, one for each year the band was together from 1966 to 1995, along with one track from their earliest recording sessions in 1965. Packed with over 73 hours of music, both the boxed set and the USB drive will be individually numbered limited editions.

    The 80-disc boxed set is individually numbered and limited to 6,500 copies, a nod to the band’s formation in 1965. Along with the CDs, it also includes a gold-colored 7-inch vinyl single which bookends the band’s career. The A-side is “Caution (Do Not Stop On Tracks)” from the band’s earliest recording session in 1965 with the B-side of the last song the band ever performed together live, “Box Of Rain” recorded during their final encore at Soldier Field in Chicago on July 9, 1995.

    The box also comes with a 288-page book that features an extensive, career-spanning essay written by Nick Meriwether, who oversees the Dead archives at the University of California, Santa Cruz, along with special remembrances of the band submitted by fans. Also included is a scroll that offers a visual representation of how the band’s live repertoire has evolved through the years.

    The USB drive version* will be shaped like a gold lightning bolt with the Grateful Dead 50th anniversary logo engraved on the side. The drive includes all of the music from the collection in both FLAC (96/24) and MP3 formats and is an individually numbered limited edition of 1,000 copies. Digital version of the book also included on USB.

    Shows will NOT be sold individually on CD. This release is sure to sell out quickly so pre-order your copy today and stick around as we will be revealing a mighty fine selection of music, art, and much, much more right here.

    (Looking for a smaller 50th Anniversary commemorative keepsake? September 18th will see the release of a four-CD version of the collection titled 30 TRIPS AROUND THE SUN: THE DEFINITIVE LIVE STORY 1965-1995. More on that here.)

    ROLLINGSTONE.COM SONG PREMIERE AND EXCLUSIVE DAVID LEMIEUX INTERVIEW
    Head on over to Rollingstone.com for the very first listen of "Morning Dew" 9/18/87 Madison Square Garden, David Fricke's exclusive interview with archivist David Lemieux, and the reveal of 30 TRIPS AROUND THE SUN's '69 and '84 shows.

    *Helpful hints for using your USB:

    Running the 30 Trips Player / Reader program:
    On Windows – Navigate to the USB drive and double click the PCStart.exe file to run.
    On MacOS – Open the GD 30 Trips drive, and double click the MacStart to run.

    Viewing the digital book:
    You can either view it within the program that comes on the drive, or by opening the PDF directly.

    To view the PDF, open the PDF folder on the drive and the USB_bk_spreads_08-31 file within. Selecting the option within your PDF reading application to view as a “single page” might be preferable to viewing as a continuous document.

    Importing music into iTunes and other library programs:
    When you import the songs from the USB into your library, the information used to identify the track will likely leave them sorted incorrectly. Please use the song list found here to re-number the songs for each show so that they playback in the correct order.
    PDF
    Text

Comments

sort by
Recent
Reset
  • sfrank115
    Default Avatar
    Joined:
    Sweeeeeet
    Pretty awesome radio show.
  • uv1
    Joined:
    Let there be songs to fill the air!
    Thanks for that link @frankparry. Can't say I'm impressed with the design of the 4-CD box, but I'll bet the 80-disc box will be awesome. And what a monster it'll have to be. Just look at 80 CD's in your collection and see how much space they take up! I'm betting there will be a cardboard slipcase for each show. Or maybe it'll be in the style of a book. It looks like that's what they went for with the 4-disc set. If that's the case, it may be hard for folks to sell off single shows as we've seen on this board and on eBay. Besides which, I think the idea of breaking up the box defeats the vision that Dave had: i.e. taking in the 30-year journey that was the life of the Grateful Dead. So if you're someone who loves the 70's Dead, this may be an opportunity to have some later era music in your collection. And if you're an 80's/90's lover, then this is the chance to go back a bit further. My story is this: I started listening to the Grateful Dead with the album "Without A Net," so Brent has always sounded great to me. I never did get to see Brent, though. I saw the Dead 4 times -- 3 in '91 and once in '93. I was at the 2 MSG shows before the 9/10/91 show in the box. Then I stopped listening for years. It wasn't until my son was born 3-1/2 years ago that I started listening again. Man, I was HOOKED! I tracked down every Road Trips and Bonus Disc over the next year, and then started in on the Dave's Picks and newer box sets as they came out. Despite my expanding collection, I was still pretty stuck in the late 80's and early 90's. But I slowly worked my way backwards. '77 and '74 offered ample rewards for my listening, but earlier than that was a little too much for me. Kinda raw at times. And Pigpen took some getting used to. So it took me a while to get into '72 and all that the European tour has going for it. Now I can dig it. On the other side of the Dead's career, I shied away from post '91 stuff. Without Hornsby, what magic did the band still have up their sleeves? Then I pulled out th '93 Cal Expo Road Trips this year. I've gotta tell you, it's good. Way better than I thought it should be. So when I first saw this box set, I thought, "Way too expensive," and "Too much stuff that I don't want." But the more I thought about it, the more excited I became to hear those shows from years I had shied away from - pre '72 and post '91. I think the box will be an amazing opportunity to experience the full scope of what the Grateful Dead's music was. Thanks for reading. Reach out your hand If your cup is empty If your cup is full May it be again
  • floridabobaloo
    Joined:
    Time being short
    I came up with a rather new twist. Listening to an entire show sometimes just isn't possible, so what I've done is to select one disc from a set and create a mix up. Yesterday I started with some 73 and jumped to 90 then back to 72, etc. kinda works with the 50th concept. I have SO much Dead now, I might be able to only enjoy 1 complete show in a day and that would take a while to go thru all of it. So this approach is in play. I'm also rotating in terms of sets too. First sets and then Second.It gives me a broad palate to draw from and lots of years to combine into one big groove for the day. I've read were some folks wouldn't try this, but it's working in the summer heat so far! Enjoy yourselves!
  • JimInMD
    Joined:
    Change
    There's some good insight into some of the music that influenced Jerry and some of the directions he wanted to explore or did not in the following March '78 JGB interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya2Vv1zcGmY It gives some background on the edgier, harder feel the music took on at that time. There's an interesting piece about new wave and punk that starts about 29 min in. Very interesting stuff.. if you had the same conversation say in '72 or '73, Its very likely names like Django Reinhardt, Ornette Coleman, Miles Davis and the like might just pop up. At one point Garcia states, "I like Cheap Trick." A musical Omnivore he was.. 35 min in he speaks highly of the Who and Townsend but says its a drag to do the same show '4 years in a row. Change and reinvention is a part of the golden thread this tapestry is woven from. Anyway, more food for thought. The only thing constant in this world is change.
  • ToddWCorey70
    Joined:
    Keith
    Unfortunately, when I think of Keith's later playing, I invariably think of the Cornell Fire. His blocky repetitive chords are just a sin, and almost ruin this amazing song for me. Give me his early stuff any day, the man was fantastic!
  • frankparry
    Joined:
    Box Design
    I'm not sure if this has been posted before but the British magazine Uncut has a picture of the 4CD version of 30 Trips box and a description and link to Viola Lee Blues: http://www.uncut.co.uk/news/grateful-dead-exclusive-hear-an-unreleased-…
  • MrHeartbreak
    Joined:
    @Thin
    "But I think some of the reason he began to decline is the band's '78 swerve into louder, fuzzier, raunchier tones and electric rock 'n roll (vs the ragtime band). When Keith joined in 1971 it was a 1-drummer band and by '73 they were playing light, loose and ragtime/jazzy. But suddenly in '78 they were in full beast mode and a piano doesn't really fit into a raging 2-drummer band easily - must have been frustrating for him." Excellent post, Thin. I never articulated this correctly, and I think you are right. Since we were talking about the "non-factor" issue (and I'd never actually noticed anything BAD before, like the 12/31/78 bad chord), I decided to check out a couple songs from the famous 5/8/77 gig. After all, we all know that show, right? I dialed up Estimated Prophet in the car, and listened for what Keith was doing. Now, granted, I'm cruising down the road in 93-degree Florida heat, so the AC is cranked to the max, but let me just say: during the first 3 minutes or so that I road-tested that song, I did not hear Keith...at all. I could hear everybody else: Phil, Jerry, Bobby, Mickey & Billy. I skipped ahead to Morning Dew, and I heard a little bit of tinkling piano during the first few minutes...nothing bad, but nothing remarkable. Sounded low in the mix, too...very low. Maybe they really did turn his volume down overall? No idea. For contrast, I listened to a Yes show from the same basic era, '78. Rick Wakeman on keyboards. Now, it's not a fair comparison, I know: different band, different style. But I'll tell you what: those keyboards were prominent, I mean PROMINENT, in the mix. All over the place. So maybe it wasn't just drugs, passivity, or whatnot. Maybe he really was mixed intentionally low by the latter years of the Godchauxs' tenure.
  • estimated-eyes
    Joined:
    12/31/78
    I always liked this show, but Keith is a non-factor and he really blows it toward the end of Good Lovin'-- when the rest of the band stops at one point, Keith hits a big chord. That is one of the worst obvious errors I have heard in all my GD listening, way worse than any vocal flubs they regularly made. Re: Beware Mr. Baker and the Clapton comment, in the movie they talk about Ginger's style a lot and that he was really a jazz drummer thrust into a rock and roll band. Clapton's comment, I think he was more appalled by the comparison to Bonham, you can hear him say, "no, no, Zep..." and then he catches himself before being caught on camera bashing LZ. Ginger could swing, hit 'em hard and provide some world beats, too. I like Keith Moon a lot and find his drumming amazing in his prime. This documentary gave me a better appreciation of Ginger Baker's talents-- in spite of the fact that he is absolutely insane.
  • Thin
    Joined:
    Keith "going through Jerry's briefcase"???
    Rdevil - Can you clarify what is meant by "Keith going through Jerry's briefcase may have been his biggest sin"??? Do you mean he was actually busted rifling through his stuff/stealing Jerry's stash, or was that just a euphemism for "he was doing the same, err…, recreational stuff as Jerry and it had a very negative effect"? I do recall a story from one book where someone had stolen Jerry's stash from his briefcase and he started VERY indiscreetly confronting people "Who took my bindle!" Maybe these stories are related (though probably not - made me think of it though…) I'm mildly uncomfortable that this is getting into unsavory gossip, but I'm hitting "send" anyway...
  • Kayak Guy
    Joined:
    Keith vs Mickey
    What an interesting take that I never thought about before, it's Mickey's fault ;) It does stand the basic logic test of jazz based piano players were considered part of the rhythm section and the addition of a 2nd drummer would leave less space for Keith in the mix, where as syths, cheesey keyboards and organ would occupy a different spot in a 2 drummer line up. things to listen for in the future. Billy's new book has also given me lots to listen for and highly recommended for his point of view from the drummers seat on the mood/drug consumption of the periods. Jerry seems to be one of the few junkies that could still play well far longer than most of the people around him and even though it became a problem, they let it continue as the money became everyone's drug of choice at the end. meanwhile Weather Report suite from 9/12/73 SBD just shuffled on and Keith is sounding great, too bad theres a bunch of horns soloing where Jerry should be playing and it sounds like a flock of waterfowl having an orgy.
user picture

Member for

17 years 7 months

"When we began discussing audio projects to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Grateful Dead back in 2012, we knew we wanted to do something completely unprecedented. We could think of nothing more exciting or ambitious than a career-spanning overview of the band's live legacy focused on what best tells the story: complete concerts. Our first criterion was the very best live music to represent any given year in the band’s history. We wanted to make sure that there were not only the tent-pole shows that fans have been demanding for decades but also ones that are slightly more under the radar, but equally excellent. For those who listen to the entire box straight through, chronologically, the narrative of the Grateful Dead's live legacy will be seen as second to none in the pantheon of music history." - David Lemieux

We are more than pleased to announce the Grateful Dead's most ambitious release ever: 30 TRIPS AROUND THE SUN. Available as both an 80-disc boxed set and a custom lightning-bolt USB drive, the collection includes 30 unreleased live shows, one for each year the band was together from 1966 to 1995, along with one track from their earliest recording sessions in 1965. Packed with over 73 hours of music, both the boxed set and the USB drive will be individually numbered limited editions.

The 80-disc boxed set is individually numbered and limited to 6,500 copies, a nod to the band’s formation in 1965. Along with the CDs, it also includes a gold-colored 7-inch vinyl single which bookends the band’s career. The A-side is “Caution (Do Not Stop On Tracks)” from the band’s earliest recording session in 1965 with the B-side of the last song the band ever performed together live, “Box Of Rain” recorded during their final encore at Soldier Field in Chicago on July 9, 1995.

The box also comes with a 288-page book that features an extensive, career-spanning essay written by Nick Meriwether, who oversees the Dead archives at the University of California, Santa Cruz, along with special remembrances of the band submitted by fans. Also included is a scroll that offers a visual representation of how the band’s live repertoire has evolved through the years.

The USB drive version* will be shaped like a gold lightning bolt with the Grateful Dead 50th anniversary logo engraved on the side. The drive includes all of the music from the collection in both FLAC (96/24) and MP3 formats and is an individually numbered limited edition of 1,000 copies. Digital version of the book also included on USB.

Shows will NOT be sold individually on CD. This release is sure to sell out quickly so pre-order your copy today and stick around as we will be revealing a mighty fine selection of music, art, and much, much more right here.

(Looking for a smaller 50th Anniversary commemorative keepsake? September 18th will see the release of a four-CD version of the collection titled 30 TRIPS AROUND THE SUN: THE DEFINITIVE LIVE STORY 1965-1995. More on that here.)

ROLLINGSTONE.COM SONG PREMIERE AND EXCLUSIVE DAVID LEMIEUX INTERVIEW
Head on over to Rollingstone.com for the very first listen of "Morning Dew" 9/18/87 Madison Square Garden, David Fricke's exclusive interview with archivist David Lemieux, and the reveal of 30 TRIPS AROUND THE SUN's '69 and '84 shows.

*Helpful hints for using your USB:

Running the 30 Trips Player / Reader program:
On Windows – Navigate to the USB drive and double click the PCStart.exe file to run.
On MacOS – Open the GD 30 Trips drive, and double click the MacStart to run.

Viewing the digital book:
You can either view it within the program that comes on the drive, or by opening the PDF directly.

To view the PDF, open the PDF folder on the drive and the USB_bk_spreads_08-31 file within. Selecting the option within your PDF reading application to view as a “single page” might be preferable to viewing as a continuous document.

Importing music into iTunes and other library programs:
When you import the songs from the USB into your library, the information used to identify the track will likely leave them sorted incorrectly. Please use the song list found here to re-number the songs for each show so that they playback in the correct order.
PDF
Text

user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

Alvarhanso, thank you for your response. Would you or anyone out there mind explaining what determines if a show is mixed from a 2 track, 16 track, 24 track, ect. If 16 track was available for shows as far back as 69 shouldn't it be available for at least some of the other releases of lesser sound quality? For example, why was a 2 track mixed used for Spring 90 1, and a 24 track mix used for Spring 90 2 (The Other One Too) when all the shows were from the same tour. It seems like the 24 track mix should have been available for both boxes. And for the DaP's and RT's were 16 track mixes not available for some reason or did they opt not to use that method? Thanks again just trying to get a good grasp of this process!
user picture

Member for

12 years 4 months
Permalink

Dig the post born cross-eyed. Here's the shows I'm probably going to dive into first. 1) 10/21/83 Worcester, MA - This show is appealing to me since it's a Brent Bday show, and I've never heard this show yet as well. It sounds like it could be a hot one, since it follows the Fall 83' Hartford run. 2) 6/24/85 Cincinnati, OH - Another mid-80's show that I haven't touched base with yet. Should be good since it's June 85' show. 3) 9/18/74 Dijon, France - Wall Of Sound.. I'm ready for some Phil bombs!! 4) 11/28/80 Lakeland, FL - Big fan of anything Fall 80'. This is the only November 80 show that I haven't heard yet.. Looks really good. 5) 3/18/71 St. Louis, MO - Really hot 71 show. It'll be nice to hear a official remastered version of this..
user picture

Member for

13 years 5 months
Permalink

They could have used the multi-tracks for the first Spring '90 box but shamefully cheaped out on us and did not. They went the extra mile on Spring '90 TOO, probably thinking it would help sales. That didn't work out, as the first box sold out quickly and the second hasn't yet. There is a big difference in sound quality between the two. I sold the bad one after spinning it once. The 30 Trips box is mostly 2-track, because shows were usually taped in multi-track only if they were being considered for release. So the vast majority of the vault is 2-track tapes. Some of them sound surprisingly good, but I can't think of one that holds a candle to the best of the multi-track mixes.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

13 years 2 months
Permalink

Not sure why not here, but there is the UJB from Dijon 74 on Jambase Why is this website so "old" when the Dead family is based in Silicon Valley , home of a million tech savvy deadheads that would build a killer site for fun and free? Weird
user picture

Member for

15 years 9 months
Permalink

Wow - I can't imagine taking WOS there and needing all the different power converters for just 7 shows. That would've cost big bucks... Couldn't find anything in deadbase or archive, but found this from archive: "Featuring what has to be considered among the very best first sets ever performed by the band, Dijon is clearly THE show of the tour. It's a brilliant performance, among the very best shows of 1974. Several songs are candidates for best ever renditions; most notably the extraordinarily jammed out show opener of Uncle Johns Band and the terrific stand-alone Scarlet Begonias. Playin' in the Band is also exceptionally well played. The solid second set includes a dynamite performance of Eyes of the World and a unique jam suite featuring the first Caution Jam performed since early 1969. This performance is the creme de la creme of the tour! (99 pts) " That sounds awesome...
user picture

Member for

10 years 9 months
Permalink

One Man pretty well summed it up. The vast majority of tapes were made on from a 2 track mix at the soundboard, and multitrack was used for tours or shows where they were looking to make a live album. Back in the 60s or 70s multitrack recording usually meant using a mobile recording truck outside the venue to record the show and mix it. By the 80s & 90s, multi track recording was easier to accomplish without a mobile unit. Betty Cantor-Jackson is probably the most famous recording engineer the Dead had, she simply had excellent ears & did her mixing live with headphones. Bear was recording while also running sound, so his recordings can suffer from his primary job coming first and taping coming second, though he still made outstanding tapes. The Dead were the first or at least among the very first bands to use a 16 track recorder in the studio, much less for a live recording, so Fillmore West 69 is an aberration for the time, and we have what we have of that run because they specifically set out to record Live Dead and wanted to do it with the best possible fidelity, hence the 16 track. The use of multitrack allows for each member to have their own channel essentially, so that in mixing, if Bob is playing quietly on St Stephen, it can be boosted a bit, or if Pig's organ is a bit loud, it can be attenuated, and the instruments can be panned so that they don't occupy the same space and muddy the mix. The 2 tracks were made for listening the next day, with no real thought that one day 43 years later it might be released
user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

Expense was a big reason they didn't do more recording with the multi-track in the 70s. I've read that it cost a lot more than two-track, because you have not only the mobile truck business as an added expense, but you also have more expensive tape feeding the multi-track recorders (and a lot more of it - keep in mind, it's like making 8x as many recordings of the same show if you're doing 16 tracks, compared to 2, AND they record faster, which means you go through much more tape per track in a minute than with a two-track machine). As far as comparing the two (two-track vs. multi-track) - There are some really good two-track recordings in the vaults. Everything they've released from 1977 is two-track, and it sounds really good; in fact, I would say most of the '77 stuff sounds better than at least one of the Dead's multi-track releases: Live at the Cow Palace New Year's Eve 1976. Cow Palace doesn't sound horrible, but the tape hiss level is extraordinarily higher than usual, and the fidelity extraordinarily lower (not necessarily due to the multi-track process itself, but probably for other reasons - in general, if done properly, you're going to get a better mix out of multi-track masters). Who knows, maybe they ran out of Maxell XLIIS tapes and put low bias tape in the machine that night ;-). Compared to the Winterland June 1977 box set, for example, Cow Palace does not sound as good, (subjectively speaking of course, but trust me on this one:)

Member for

10 years 6 months
Permalink

Multitrack tape in that period was usually a 2 inch wide reel. The cost was quite expensive. It would run typically at a high speed for the quality of the sound. A reel would go say 10-15 minutes.When we refer to a 8/16/24/32 or how many tracks, the concept is simple. The end result will be a stereo recording. That is L/R OR 2 track. The process begins with the multiple track recording. Yes every voice or instrument is given its own track which can be EQed, given any efx, or processing. Back then16-24 track was the norm. In today's digital world there's really no limit. Then it was limited by the size of the tape. Once a performance was tracked, you would make adjustments to each track, which usually was adjusting the equalization and position in the stereo field. If you want keyboards on the left and guitars more on the right, you dialed that in via the mixing console. The goal of this step was to mix down to a stereo 2 track tape machine. So in essence if you had 24 separate tracks, in the recording phase, you now had the tune mixed to stereo. this is the mixing phase. Finally that stereo tape would be run thru a console once again and those 2 tracks, would be equalized and in some cases, run thru noise reduction, or compression or other sound processing. This is called Mastering. So you have 3 steps in the process from the initial recording of the performance to the final product we buy as a stereo recording. Today the main difference is we use computers and a format of digitally recording as opposed to analog magnetic recorders back in the day. You still have to capture the best performance as cleanly as you can. And you still have to have very good ears! A live 2 track, as said, was simply a stereo copy of the mixing board at a live show to capture the sound of the performance. Most times that tape was used to listen to a performance to evaluate the quality of the performance. 2 track tape is 1/4 inch wide and runs from 7.5-15 inches per second. Called ips. So you will see notes of two track tape at 7.5 ips. Later in the career of the Dead they utilized cassette tapes or DAT ( digital audio tape ) to record the shows. And as stated these weren't recorded to be commercially released. Many bands recorded their shows simply to listen to afterward to see what they sounded like.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 4 months
Permalink

All this talk about the box vs the USB and sounds quality has motivated me to revisit my digitized versions of the GD albums I own. I'm now trying to re-rip all my GD albums to FLAC to archive them. Does anyone know of a site/repository that has hi-res versions of all of the album covers, even box set album covers?
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years
Permalink

I usually just run a search in Google Chrome under pics...moe often than not I find something in good resolution that I can use. Sometimes I will open them in Paint to resize or change the pixel resolution. I have found some good images on Wikipedia as well as the GD archive here too. Good luck :)
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 5 months
Permalink

This is great guys, exactly what I was looking for! Google works for most covers but some of the box set stuff is extremely hard to find. Thanks for making my night!
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

....that the ptb left Vince's name off the box. Well, my name is Vince as well, and I am offended too. Get it right, or get it not at all.... ....first three? Lindley Meadows, Augusta, San Diego....
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

13 years 9 months
Permalink

After reading Weiner's Rise Of Terrapin Nation, I started working my through each and every '77 show in order. I have gotten up to the 4/25/77 show, which is where this trek crosses paths with the 30 trips box. For those not averse to listening to anything that will be soon (we all hope) be appearing on our doorsteps in more pristine sound, there is a soundboard available on the archive. I've read on these forums more than once how some people frequently skip past Looks Like Rain. Their loss (just my opinion), but for a delightful example of stellar interplay between Jerry and Keith throwing golden notes like candy for your soul, check this one out. Onward.....
user picture

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

I was Googling info on the box set and came across this webpage. I don't know where they got their info, but if this is true and 28 of the 30 shows are from two track sources, does this mean that the quality will only be as good as the Spring 1990 (Volume One) Box and not as good as the Spring 1990 (The Other One) Box? I've read reviews where people say that the sound on the Spring 1990 (The Other One) Box is much better because it was remastered using 24 track tapes instead of the 2 track DATs. I don't own either of these box sets, so I don't know if there is really a big difference between the two. I also realize that the time spent remastering would also have a lot to do with the quality. I'm just concerned about comments on some of the tracks on the listening parties which I realize are only crappy MP3s. What can you tell me? Notes page from a web site called The Best of Website. http://www.thebestofwebsite.com/Bands/Grateful_Dead/Reviews/30%20Trips%… Notes: Top of Page Limited to 6,500 individually numbered copies Mastering split between Dave Glasser Jeffrey Norman Two shows are multi-track The rest were from two track sources Ship Date: September 18, 2015 80 discs 73+ hours of music 30 unreleased live shows, one for each year from 1966 to 1995 1 Gold-colored 7-inch featuring "Caution (Do Not Stop On Tracks)" 1965/"Box Of Rain" Soldier Field, Chicago, 7/9/95 288-page book with an extensive, career-spanning essay by Nicholas Meriwether and special remembrances submitted by fans A scroll featuring a visual representation of the band's evolution FREE U.S. STANDARD SHIPPING ON PRE-ORDERS ONLY!
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

13 years 9 months
Permalink

Just like almost all the dicks picks, road trips, and daves picks are from two track sources, this box, except for two shows evidently, is from two track sources. However, many other factors come into play. First, the quality of the original mixes made on the fly during the concert. The mixes are usually done to accommodate the sound in the concert hall, which may or may not translate well to direct playback. This is not always the case, as sometimes separate mixes are made on the fly for recording that are separate from the mix being sent to the PA. Another consideration is what we're the two track recordings being recorded on. Up to some time around 1980 they used reel to reel (the speed in ips also affects quality), which is the best analog taping technology with about the equivalent of 13-bit depth in digital terms. But in the eighties the mostly used cassettes, which are much lower quality, only the equivalent of around 5 to 7 bits in digital terms. Then they switched to DAT, digital audio tape, which was usually using either 16 or 20 bit technology, which is excellent, bit the early digital encoding technology did not always sound great for other reasons, I expect that they chose shows that all sound relatively good, and they can use modern technology to make them sound as good as possible. But, I also expect that the sound quality will vary quite a bit from show to show, with the early to mid-eighties being the hardest to make sound as full and present as the rest. I'm not worried. I grew up with crappy audience cassettes and loved them. These will be far far superior to that. I'll be thrilled, without any doubt.
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

If Dave Glasser has mastered half of the shows then I am right to worry about the sound quality - he was able to take the multi-track masters for the Warlocks show and produce the worst mix ever released by Dead.net (and Crimson White and Indigo was not much better)... the Warlocks shows from the 24 tracks masters should have sounded as good as Spring 90 TOO they don't... if you don't believe me just play a couple of tracks side by side on a hi-fi not as mp3s
user picture

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

Hey Grateful Dod - wjon nails it. Also see Keithfan's earlier comment about 2-track recordings from '77 sounding better than many multitracks. Also I'm almost sure the Box has been cleaned up with the Plangent Process, which they use for box releases. Here are some 2-trackls which sound absolutely glorious - the kind of sound quality that would compel me to listen to musical gibberish just to bathe in the sound: May 1977 Box DP 36 (1972) DP 33 (10/9-10/10/ 76) Winterland 73 Box Winterland 77 Box Dap 8 (1980 - though it is a matrix) DP 13 (1981) Terrapin Limited (March 1990 - pretty sure it's 2-track)
user picture

Member for

16 years
Permalink

CWI and Warlock's box was mixed by Mike McGinn, Spring 90 TOO was mixed by Jeffrey Norman, and I think that's why the difference in sound quality.
user picture

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

Worth mentioning - it was Joe Gastwirt, not Jeffrey Norman, who mastered Terrapin Limited, 90. Everything I've ever heard Gastwirt do sounds INCREDIBLE.
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

that's a relief!!! thanks for the correction...
user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

I was really impressed with the most recent Dave's Picks sound quality. I think DaP 15 may be the best sounding Dave's Picks release (all of which are two-track masters). There is some distortion for a minute or two in Bertha, but beyond that, it's very smooth and dynamic (and mixed well at the board - Keith isn't too high in the mix like I hate to admit he is in DaP 12). lgreen - what is it that you don't like about the Crimson White & Indigo mix? Just curious. wjonjd - nice supplementary info on the sound quality discussion, some stuff in there I didn't know. claney - those are some glorious sounding two-tracks, you've just inspired me to put Winterland '73 on (uggggh, which show to choose, they're all so good...maybe we'll go with show #1 because of Here Comes Sunshine and Race Is On, or show #2 because of the Playing/UJB/Morning Dew sandwich, or should I go #3 for the Loose Lucy and Dark Star....)
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

KeithFan2112 I think the mix on the DVD of Crimson, White & Indigo is fine but the CD mix sounds very congested and compressed on my hi-fi, a little like Warlocks but not as bad... most of the rest of the Dead HDCD releases sound varying degrees of greatness (as they should do since i built the hi-fi system around playing them)
user picture

Member for

17 years 5 months
Permalink

I think the 2-track DAT mix of the first Spring '90 box is fine. I also believe that if nobody knew it was a 2-track mix, many people wouldn't know the difference. To my ears, the second S'90 box is the best sounding release they've put out. The necessary time and care to dial it in is evident. Regarding the Warlocks box, the only element that sounds off to me is the overhead drum mics were mixed too hot and the high hat cymbal mics too low. At points, at least one of the drummers ride cymbals are very prominent. Compare the mix of "Feel Like a Stranger" from Without a Net versus the Warlocks box. I think the E'72 box mixes are fine, though some shows sound fuller and more balanced than others.
user picture

Member for

16 years 10 months
Permalink

SPACE BROTHER, I agree about e72 - I was never sure why it received so much criticism - I think they are almost uniformly excellent sounding but still short of Spring 90 TOO which is amazing. Will agree to disagree re Warlocks - wish it was only the drums but you are right the comparison with how Feel like sounds on Without a net is revelatory but then the direct comparisons between Without a Net and Spring 90 TOO even more revealing of the work they put into Spring 90 TOO - I really don't understand why that never sold out
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

We are all agreed that this box sounds phenomenal. I think there are a few reasons that it has not sold out yet: 1 - Downloads were made available immediately - I think they should have sold all of the boxes first 2 - Some folks did not want another '90 box so close to the first release I myself love the sound of both boxes. I think they catch the band at a really good time. If you are looking for individual shows they are available on ebay. Rock on
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 3 months
Permalink

I like Spring 1990 vol. 1 a lot. I has a great concert feel to it. Spring TOO is also great, in absolutist terms the audio quality is superior, with a much different conceptualization by the engineer that did the mix. To me, Spring TOO almost sounds like a live in the studio recording. Two different approaches, two great results. I listened to the download versions, don't know about the CD mastering or the effects of the differing sample rates etc. I have read that Plangent processing was used mastering 30 Trips to eliminate distortion caused by wow & flutter (analog sources) and jitter (digital sources). Between that and any equalization used by the mastering engineers, I'm sure all shows will sound fabulous.
user picture

Member for

10 years 1 month
Permalink

"At other times, weirdness was thrust upon him. Once when Parish and Garcia were strolling the sidewalks of New York City, a car screeched to a stop near them. A passenger emerged, handed Garcia a shoebox, and said, "Take care of this, man. Please, whatever you do, don't lose it" After he departed, Garcia read the note attached to the shoebox: "This is the lizard god, Chonga-Bonga. Don't let him die." When Garcia opened the shoebox, he found an iguana resting on a bed of grass. "Let's go," Garcia told Parish. "We have our orders." The iguana was part of the entourage for weeks until Cutler accidentally scalded it in a bathtub." :D
user picture

Member for

16 years 2 months
Permalink

That is a great story, I'm glad Richardson included it in the book. I read that segment of the book at night as I was laying in bed, slowly falling to sleep. Not long after I read that passage, I put the book down and went to sleep. I had a nice dream about that story and I imagined that I had eyewitnessed this transaction and shook both Jerry's & Parish's hands and said something like, "hurry up, we gotta get to sound check!" I also spoke to the passenger saying something like "I love you, Sunflower!" Sunflower was a super cute hippie chick, who just smiled back at me and blew me a kiss. I quickly escorted Jerry & Parish back to the hotel to give the iguana to Candice Brightman who was in the hotel lobby. I then said to Parish, "make sure Jerry sings Morning Dew" and Jerry looks at me and says, only was the last song in the 2nd set." Then I woke up the next morning.
user picture

Member for

17 years 3 months
Permalink

Other possible contributing factors to the slower sales of S90 TOO: Individual sale of the Branford show - I expect many were happy to just get that one. Especially because of... ...the perception that the "best" shows were picked for the first box, and that (except for the Branford show) the second box was "leftovers." Myself, I'm glad I got the TOO box, and as Spacebro says, it is hard to beat the sound of it. You feel it in your bones. Keithfan, I know what you mean about Winterland 73. I've probably gone for the Dark Star most of all, but you've inspired me to give the whole thing a listen.
user picture

Member for

9 years 5 months
Permalink

The better version is in Parrish's book Home Before Daylight, No Simple Highway has many stories culled, with credits, from many GD related books that have been out previously.No Simple Highway was a good read, but breaks little new ground after the 1970's.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 1 month
Permalink

Thank you all so much for your very knowledgeable comments regarding sound quality and mixing! I feel much more informed on this process now. I have to put in one more plug for the Spring 90 TOO box. If you have even considered buying the FTW box (not this guy) and don't have Spring 90 TOO I believe that it would be a much better investment. One day it will sell out and then people will regret not buying it down the road. I know I feel that way about the Spring 1 box and the 77 Box. Keithfan I agree that Da15 is the best sounding Dave's Picks I have heard so far. I Would love to see a primal 69 release to end the year. If not 69 then how about some 73! Last thought, are they ever going to reissue the Winterland 77 release. I can't find anything stating that it was a limited edition release and there are so many people that would love to have a copy?
user picture

Member for

10 years 1 month
Permalink

Kayak - Interesting, thanks. I haven't read much of anything on the Dead yet besides Weiner, McNally and this one in progress by Richardson. Love some of the Weiner stuff, though I found McNally's Long Strange Trip kind of dry...need to revisit. Born Cross-Eyed...love it, thanks for sharing. I wish it had really happened. Or maybe..to unabashedly quote from Harry Potter, one that sticks with me often: “Tell me one last thing,” said Harry. “Is this real? Or has this been happening inside my head?” Dumbledore: “Of course it’s happening inside your head, Harry.... but why on earth should that mean that it isn't real?”
user picture

Member for

9 years 5 months
Permalink

No Simple Highway has excellent Notes and Sources sections in the back that make a great list of his original sources, and other books to check out.

Member for

10 years 6 months
Permalink

I hit the record store today and saw 2CDs I want to ask aboutAmerican Beauty and Workingmans in Hybrid SACD format from 2014 They have the Original Master Recording label on top like the old days from Mobile Fidelity Labs. Have any of you bought these and do you think they are that much better? I appreciate the feedback, thanks.

Member for

10 years 6 months
Permalink

I hit the record store today and saw 2CDs I want to ask aboutAmerican Beauty and Workingmans in Hybrid SACD format from 2014 They have the Original Master Recording label on top like the old days from Mobile Fidelity Labs. Have any of you bought these and do you think they are that much better? I appreciate the feedback, thanks.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

9 years 3 months
Permalink

Curious to hear from anyone, I have the Winterland 77 box, is there any compelling reason to spring for the May 77 set in addition?
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

14 years
Permalink

I bet they are the same mixes from the dvd-a and high-res downloads. Mickey Hart remixed those years ago and they are different than the originals. I know that Sugar Magnolia sounds really different than the original version...Candyman as well. I like to listen to them at times but the original mixes are part of my DNA by now :)
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

13 years 2 months
Permalink

The St.paul show is solid..... The Tuscaloosa show is big big. Sound is very nice.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

13 years 2 months
Permalink

I brought this up a month or two ago. If your short cash and u want a killer box ...This is it. 3~14~90 is a sonic space between my speakers , right in the middle. Sounds like my fireplace is spewing magic, unreal. Monitor Audio white gloss towers pushed with Integra stuff, but that Let it Grow makes my set up stand up and bow!
user picture

Member for

13 years 5 months
Permalink

I have these on DVD-Audio, where they are the Mickey remixes. He started from scratch with the multi-tracks, so you hear all kinds of interesting differences. His idea of the stereo field is unconventional. But the most obvious change is his use of tracks that were muted on the original mixes. Sugar Magnolia features pedal steel guitar, there are backing vocals in New Speedway Boogie you've never heard before, etc. I read them into a WAV editor and bumped them down to CD-Rs for convenience. I think there is a surround mix also, but I don't have a surround system. That said, I don't know if the SACD versions are the same mixes as the DVD-A. I would definitely find out before investing.
user picture
Default Avatar

Member for

12 years 11 months
Permalink

I have the Mobile Fidelity SACDs and the DVD-As and the SACDs are the original mix, and they sound glorious. The Hart remixes are interesting to listen to from time to time, and especially in surround, but I reach for the original mix most of the time.

Member for

10 years 6 months
Permalink

Thank youI suspected these were super clear original mixes. Back in the days of albums, these were offered for some of the most popular releases and sounded a cut or two above. I'll pick them up.
user picture

Member for

17 years 4 months
Permalink

Once again! Rock on
user picture

Member for

9 years 7 months
Permalink

I think we will see this number be very fluid until the box actually ships. I'm assuming that dead.net has no way to add canceled items back into the inventory online until it "sells out" on line. This would explain so many sellouts instead of the number of boxes increasing every time someone cancels. Does anyone know if you can cancel after the charge is made but before it ships? Not that I would ever cancel... Just wondering when this will really sell out.
user picture

Member for

10 years 3 months
Permalink

Depends on what compels you. As Dr Shakedown mentioned, Tuscaloosa is big big, (in the top 5 shows on the Spring '77 tour, and St Paul is up there too). 5/12 is a little bit underrated, and is also killer. There are 3 killer Scarlet / Fires on May 1977, including the infamous "quacking duck" version on 5/17 (there does happen to be an audio drop out at the beginning of Jerry's vocals on Winterland June 1977 Scarlet / Fire, so you're getting closer-to-flawless versions here). There is also an incredible Comes A Time from 5/12. In my opinion, you should get it. Even though a high percentage of the songs overlap, like all Grateful Dead, there are nuances within the playing that you don't want to miss, as well as that "whole is greater than the sum of its parts" aspect to all of the shows. You're getting 5 near-perfect shows of the Dead at their peak (why settle for the 3 you have, when you could have 8? :-) To answer your question literally, these are the songs you get on May 1977, but not Winterland June 1977: Big River Comes A Time Dancin' in the Streets High Time Iko Iko Me and My Uncle Playing in the Band Promised Land Ship Of Fools Stella Blue Details? 5/11 St Paul, Minnesota. If it's not enough that they actually play Big River in St. Paul, Minnesota....Awesome Scarlet Fire. There's a killer UJB / Space / Wharf Rat on 5/11, and a wonderful Brokedown Palace I wouldn't want to miss. There's also a great Peggy-O that was my all time favorite until I got my hands on 5/25. Also a Sugaree that would get talked about more if there weren't two other great versions already released in DP 3 (5/22) and To Terrapin (5/28). 5/12, first Chicago show. Awesome Mississippi Half-Step (although the first line of the vocals is indistinct due to technical issue, but it's brief). The "Rio Grandio" coda is one of the best. This one always feels like a Bobby show to me. He comes on strong in the first set with Me & My Uncle, Cassidy, Jack Straw, and New Minglewood Blues, and these are all killer post-hiatus renderings; he continues in the second set with Samson, Estimated, and a killer Playing medley. There's also Jerry's second set highlight, Comes a Time. Also a solid Terrapin Station (not that you don't have a couple of those on Winterland '77). Depending on whether you have the bonus disc for Winterland '77, you may already have some of this show. 5/13, 2nd Chicago show. Opens with the infamous "Calling Dr. Beachwood, calling Dr. Shots" line from Donna (I think she was trying to get Mickey to the stage), and then a great Music Never Stopped. It has a super-energetic (although shorter) Scarlet Begonias. The early jam / Jerry solo leading into "the wind in the willows" line is just over-the-top. Also a solid Jack-A-Roe on here. Also a great 2nd set medley that goes Estimated=> Other One => Stella Blue => Going Down the Road. 5/15, St. Louis has an awesome 2nd set. IMHO the best Estimated / Eyes, and then Ship of Fools is in there, and St. Stephen => Iko => NFA, and then concludes with Sugar Magnolia and Uncle John's Band. 5/17 Tuscaloosa, one of the great set list / near-flawless performances of the tour, up there I think with 5/8 and 5/25. Just look at it: First set: New Minglewood Blues Mississippi Half-Step Uptown Toodeloo El Paso They Love Each Other Jack Straw Jack-a-Roe Looks Like Rain Tennessee Jed Passenger High Time Big River Sunrise Scarlet Begonias Fire on the Mountain Second set: Samson and Delilah > Bertha > Good Lovin' Brown-Eyed Women Estimated Prophet Terrapin Station > Playing in the Band > Drums > Wharf Rat > Playing in the Band Encore: Sugar Magnolia
product sku
081227955892